Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
literature review on employee engagement
employee engagement from job dissatisfication
literature review on employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: literature review on employee engagement
Management Topic:
Organizations that understand and utilize employee engagement strategies are recruiting and retaining employees more effetely.
Case Study:
Doherty, R. (2010). Making employee engagement an end-to-end practice. Strategic HR Review, 9(3), 32-37. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umuc.edu/10.1108/14754391011040055
This case study examines how employee engagement , attract, recruit and retention can combined with technology to create an end-to-end (from the begin to the end) engagement practice. The case study uses a practical approach to explain how employee engagement, attraction and retention can be very effective when combined with technology , no matter the what the size of the organization is. The study provided guidance
…show more content…
(2014). Job enrichment as determinant of employee engagement. Review of HRM, 3, 140-146 The article discuss how important employee engagement is to a organization and how job enrichment plays an import role in employee engagement. It provided 7 ways that job enrichment helps employee engagement as well as 9 recommendations to improving employee engagement. I use this article because this was the only article that discussed job enrichment having a role in employee engagement. And this is the only article that brings up the fact that globalization has been the reason organizations are focusing on employee engagement. The author is not very knowable about this subject per say, but she does has knowledge in the business administration, which could be why she was able see that job enrichment and employee engagement complaint each …show more content…
M., & Turgut, T. (2015). The buzzword: Employee engagement. does person-organization fit contribute to employee engagement? Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 8(2), 157-179. The purpose of this paper was to look at the relationship between person-organization fit and employee engagement as well as organizational engagement scale (OES). In the study employee engagement is divided into two dimensions: work engagement and organizational engagement. To measure organizational engagement was measured by a 15-item Organizational Engagement Scale, that the authors created. They provide participants a questionnaire and evaluated the results measuring them with the OES. The results showed that person - organization contributed to work and organizational engagement, but person-organizational fit to organizational engagement contribution was more powerful. The research used participants from 3 different work sectors in Turkey that consisted with employees from different ages groups, sex and profession. This article has been that only article I have read so far that has used so many participant and with so many
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
Rich, B., Lepine, J., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Employee engagement is the investment of physical, cognitive and emotional energy and their full deployment of themselves into work roles or tasks (Kahn, 1990). Employee engagement is key to ensure employees are inspired and enthusiastic about their work. Wi...
"An increasingly important element of a positive work environment is the fostering of employee engagement. Engaged employees are not just satisfied with their work or loyal to the organization, but are energized about their contributions to the workplace and willing to go above and beyond their job description to contribute to the organization’s mission. A key component of engagement is that employees feel that the organization cares about and values their contributions."
SHRM Foundation Executive Briefing (2012). Employee Engagement: Your Competitive Advantage. Retrieved December 4, 2013, from http://www.shrm.org/about/foundation/products/Documents/Engagement%20Briefing-FINAL.pdf
I selected to discuss the employee engagement process intervention method. According to Kahn (1990), employee engagement is when organizational members utilize their emotional, cognitive, and physical means in order to perform their duties (as cited in Xu & Thomas, 2011). The purpose of using the employee engagement process intervention method is to convert the culture in management from one that is traditional to one that has shared responsibilities, collaborative, and team focused (Holman, Devane, & Cady, 2007). Furthermore, the purpose of this intervention method is to achieve an environment with open communication, and individual accountability of the culture (Holman et al., 2007).
Bakker, A.B. (2010). Engagement and “job crafting”: Engaged employees create their own great place to work. In S.L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.
It has been accepted that the term employee engagement was introduced by the Gallup Research group (Beverly Little 2006). Gallup Organization introduced the term after conducting interviews and surveys of employees for more than 25 years. The group was hoping to create a measurement of a workplace that can be used to compare other work places. The research that was conducted was published in their book ‘break all the rules’ . The findings of the Gallup group was named as Gallup Workplace Audit (GWA) and it is used to measure the relationship between employee engagement on retention, profitability and productivity. Those who score high in GWA is considered as highly engaged
Employee engagement is based on the relationship between people and organizations. People and organizations need each other. Organizations need ideas, energy, and talent; people need careers, salaries, and opportunities (Bolman & Deal, 2013, p. 117). The facts are that employee engagement is based on employee needs. As an example Apple’s offshore employees that make their products suffer in bad conditions with long hours, low pay, and intense pressure to mass produce more product. This company is an example of not having very good employee engagement. Employee engagement is about taking care of the people in your organization to allow them to grow and prosper. Employees gain motivation and interest in the success of the
Certainly those organisations which have successfully created a culture of employee engagement have reaped the benefits (Downey et al., 2015:39). However, an engaged employee culture requires stability of employment, something that is becoming increasingly rare in a working environment where a job for life is an oddity rather than the norm (Bal and De Lang, 2015:129). Employees must feel safe and secure before they can become engaged, and in a culture where high turnover of jobs is standard, then engagement is likely to be elusive. In order for the theory of employee engagement to be successful, organisations must create the right conditions for engagement and commit to the process. Similarly, in order for employee engagement in the working environment to be effective in practice, there is a need for a collegial approach. Due to many stakeholders taking on engagement roles, it doesn’t leave enough space for employees to engage in their work without having superiors constantly watching over them. The collegial approach allows the theory of employee engagement to be implemented, allowing for collective, shared responsibility by each member of the company, with minimal supervision from
Employee engagement, a term devised by Gallup research group, is viewed as an important management tool for any company who wants to be an effective and productive organization. Researches have shown that employee can contribute positively to the organization vision and goal when a company engage them effectively. The employee will also feel more passionate about their work and have a sense of belonging.
The employee engagement has become a hot topic of discussion in the corporate world. There is no single accepted definition of engagement or recognised approach for measuring or raising it. HRM Practitioners have involved in quite a lot of study to understand employee engagement and its impact on the performance of the organisation. According to them, employee engagement is a level of commitment and involvement of employees towards their organisation and its value. An engaged employee works with his/her colleagues to improve their productivity within their job, for the ultimate benefit of the organisation.
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...