Virgin Queen Analysis

1809 Words4 Pages

Elizabeth portrayed a marvelous ruler for England in times of need. She controlled religious chaos, kept England in an internal and external state of peace for a long time and served a symbol of national unity (Levin 8). Her sex had a great influence on the portrayal of her image of courage, religion, sexuality (Levin 66) and the limitations imposed by her female status continued to be present throughout her reign (Levin 145).
Since her birth, her gender provoked disappointments (Levin 5) once many believed only a boy would secure the succession and avoid civil war (Levin 5). Her mother, Anne Boleyn, accused of being incapable of providing Henry VIII with a son ended up being executed (Levin 6) and it led to the declaration of Elizabeth as …show more content…

She replaced the cult before dedicated to the Virgin Mary and used it in her favor, resulting in an ease of the damages caused by the rupture with the Catholic Church (Levin 26), serving as a symbol capable to unity the country under the love for the Queen. The cult of the Virgin Queen also served to symbolize her honor, once the honor of a woman relayed on her virginity (Levin 76) and by preserving one, she preserved the other. In another way to deny her submission to men, she always took the male role of courtship, granting position and power and controlling the level of intimacy and courtship (Levin 126). During her late thirties the marriages negotiations accelerated, once that by having a child she would secure the succession, avoid a civil war after her death and decrease the threat of the Queen being murdered, so some usurper would take the crown, besides the need of England to form an alliance (Levin 54). Elizabeth had many suitors, as the Archduke Charles. The marriage between them would bring advantages for both, England and Austria (Levin 48), but his Catholicism and the fact he would not travel to England to meet the Queen before the wedding, one of her demands, prevented the marriage from happening (Levin 49). After all, in 1574, she started to face in a more serious way the idea of marriage and started the negotiations with …show more content…

The people of English had to accept her as being less of a woman, so she could be their sovereign (Levin 3). In a way to show herself more powerful, Elizabeth called herself king (Levin 1), and she indeed liked to present herself as both king and queen of England (Levin 131). An act passed during Mary I’s rule, the 1554 Act Concerning Regal Power, which declared the separation of the bodies of the monarch (Levin 121) reinforced this image. The separation of the “body natural” and “body political” supported the idea of a female ruler (Levin 122), giving the Queen the political power of a King (Levin 121). Still, the idea of a woman in control of a nation had oppositors; as John Knox, who wrote a book characterizing woman unsuitable to rule and considered it against God’s will (Levin 10). The fact that the power of a monarch could be restrained by the Parliament made woman’s rule more acceptable to the people in England (Levin 11) . However, for religious matters, many still characterized Elizabeth as not qualified to “feed the flock of Christ” (Levin 14). Another way to assure her legitimacy, Elizabeth used the medieval practice of curing

Open Document