The Effects of the Common Experience Payment versus the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on First Nations Identity and Wellbeing

2689 Words6 Pages

Despite the wide scope of approaches taken by the Canadian government to assist in the healing process as a result of the residential schools, further evaluation and view of correspondence with Aboriginals proves that these measures may not have been as effective as they seem. Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s apology on June 11, 2008 symbolized a major step in acknowledging a national sense of shame for the terrible things inflicted upon Aboriginal youth in residential schools. However, the nature of the agreement was intended to be holistic and address numerous levels of trauma and loss, but in reality these efforts have fallen short. In particular, upon discovering how Aboriginal survivors engaged in the process have responded leaves the effects on Aboriginal identity and wellbeing up for debate. Previously established in 2007 to assist in healing with the Aboriginal schools was the Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (RSSA). This agreement allowed for residential school survivors to apply for the Common Experience Payment (CEP), the Independent Assessment Process and other healing measures. Also as a part of this Agreement was the instatement of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which began in 2008. Identity and wellbeing are determined in this paper by how well the compensation methods contributed to or impacted a survivor’s overall satisfaction, self-esteem, health, happiness or prosperity (Reimer et al. 2010: xi). The CEP was intended to provide monetary compensation for those who were abused and experienced trauma in the residential schools, and the TRC was intended as a more holistic compensation approach to supplement monetary payments as seen in the CEP.
The Common Experience Payment
The CEP was the f...

... middle of paper ...

...al identity and wellbeing. The CEP began with a strong initial acceptance, but it fell short by creating more harm than good in the Aboriginal population and inflicting additional trauma on those who opened themselves up to the process. The TRC comparably began with positive reception, but thus far in its mandate it has failed to engage the non-Aboriginal population and wider Canadian public crucial in achieving its mandate and beginning to reconstruct Aboriginal wellbeing and identity. With the mandate as it stands, in order to achieve true change in improving Aboriginal wellbeing, identity and life as a whole in Canada as a result of the Aboriginal schools, it lies primarily in the hands of the wider public to become involved in the process and learn the Aboriginal perspective so as to better understand the trauma and how to approach these problems in the future.

Open Document