The Pros And Cons Of Corporal Punishment

2207 Words5 Pages

Since the biblical times, there have been signs of child abuse. However, overtime, countries have come up with rules for what should be considered child abuse and what should not. The biggest argument occurs when people discuss corporal punishment versus child abuse. What may seem as child abuse to some is considered corporal punishment to others (Duquette & Ramsey, 1987). The majority of human beings believe that child abuse is wrong and it shouldn’t happen, which causes many to have their eyes open and look out for signs of abuse in children. By reporting child abuse, many are doing good but sometimes they are wrongfully accusing others (Duquette & Ramsey, 1987). False allegations do not occur all the time, but when they do, they can cause a lot of harm to the family. A false allegation can cause children to be removed from their families and placed into foster care. The vast majority of false allegations occur when people think they know what is happening in the family dynamic but in reality they are misinterpreting the information. Child abuse is defined as the …show more content…

Corporal punishment is a very subjective subject. what is seen by some as teaching a lesson is seen by others as physical abuse. Corporal punishment is usually seen as the use of smacking and hitting with belts (Kids Matter Inc, 2016). In the United States a parent or caretaker is looked at for ensuring the safety and proper nutrition of a child, including providing clean clothes, proper footwear, a safe living space and enforcing that the child attends school. There is a lot more that parents are expected to provide their children with but when it comes to basic needs parents are expected to ensure that the child has all of the above. Mandated reporters in the United States for child abuse are anyone who sees the abuse or suspects abuse (US Department of Health and Human Services,

More about The Pros And Cons Of Corporal Punishment

Open Document