Descartes is widely recognized as the father of modern philosophy, he is a rationalist, who considers knowledge of the metaphysical as existing separate from physical reality believing that truth cannot be acquired through the senses but through the intellect in the form of deductive reasoning. Rationalism does not involve the overcoming of religious thought. Descartes began with the basic epistemological premise of "the prior certainty of consciousness," which is the belief that the existence of an external world is not self-evident but needed to be proved by deduction from the contents of one's consciousness.
Descartes asserted that what is true knowledge is literally inborn with us. He had an attitude of doubt toward certain beliefs and that knowledge is limited. This attitude and methodology of thinking led him to doubt the existence of God and whether our own human existence was real or not. Descartes used the deductive method where he labeled all that was doubtful as false until nothing remained but that which was not doubtful as the truth. Descartes concluded that if one doubts, the doubting itself proves that one is thinking and therefore one exists.
By using the process of reason in geometry, Descartes found that the three angles of a triangle makes two right angles but that this same process of reasoning could not prove its presence. With this in mind, he went ...
... middle of paper ...
...agination to picture a pig fly.
Descartes on the other hand assumes that the "I think therefore I am" argument is the correct way to go about things. He assumes our thoughts are correct thoughts only when they appear to be correct. How do we know that we exist, because we think? How do we know for sure those two ideas correlate? He ignored the certainty of existence, proven by the contents of his mind, and instead opted for the belief that only his mind existed until he could prove otherwise. “How can I know I exist?”, or “How do I prove I exist?”
Maybe we should refer to an old classic: Star Trek the Next Generation. When the android, Lieutenant Data, asks if he is human, Descartes’ answer would be “yes” solely because he thinks. Yet Hume would probably disagree because he has no feelings therefore he cannot experience life. So the question remains; is Data human?
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Rationalism and empiricism have always been on opposite sides of the philosophic spectrum, Rene Descartes and David Hume are the best representative of each school of thought. Descartes’ rationalism posits that deduction, reason and thus innate ideas are the only way to get to true knowledge. Empiricism on the other hand, posits that by induction, and sense perception, we may find that there are in fact no innate ideas, but that truths must be carefully observed to be true. Unlike one of empiricism’s major tenets, Tabula Rasa, or blank slate, Descartes believed that the mind was not a blank slate, but actually came pre-loaded, if you will, with ideas, which are part of our rational nature an... [tags: philosophy, god, science]
541 words (1.5 pages)
- A Humean Critique of Descartes Montreal has big potholes. Lots of them. If one is to truly understand the philosophy of Hume and Descartes, one must understand what they would do with crummy roads as civil engineers in Montreal. Hume would probably repave the roads based on the success of past designs and the results of empirical data. Descartes, on the other hand, would probably leave nothing unscathed after attacking the problem with reason, scrapping the existing roadmap and re-building roads with new foundations and new directions.... [tags: Descartes Critique Philosophy Philosopher Essays]
2570 words (7.3 pages)
- David Hume is considered to be one of the big three British empiricists, along with Hobbes and Locke, and lived near the end of the Enlightenment. The Catholic Church was losing its control over science, politics and philosophy and the Aristotelian world view was being swallowed up by a more mechanistic viewpoint. Galileo found the theory provided by Copernicus to be correct, that our earth was not the center of everything, but the celestial bodies including the earth circled the sun. Mathematicians abounded.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
1677 words (4.8 pages)
- Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order to determine how these schools determine the source of knowledge.... [tags: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays]
860 words (2.5 pages)
- Empiricism (en- peiran; to try something for yourself): The doctrine that all knowledge must come through the senses; there are no innate ideas born within us that only require to be remembered (ie, Plato). All knowledge is reducible to sensation, that is, our concepts are only sense images. In short, there is no knowledge other than that obtained by sense observation. Remember that according to Descartes, what I know first and foremost are my ideas. It is only later that he seeks to know if the extramental world exists, and so he begins with his ideas and then moves towards real being (rather than vice versa).... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
1350 words (3.9 pages)
- David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher and historian. Hume carried the empiricism of John Locke and George Berkeley to the logical extreme of radical skepticism. He repudiated the possibility of certain knowledge, finding in the mind nothing but a series of sensations, and held that cause-and-effect in the natural world derives solely from the conjunction of two impressions.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
1198 words (3.4 pages)
- The power of acting without necessity and acting on one’s own discretions, free will still enamors debates today, as it did in the past with philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, and Hume. There are two strong opposing views on the topic, one being determinism and the other “free will”. Determinism, or the belief a person lacks free will and all events including human actions are determined by forces outside the will of an individual contrasts the entire premise of free will. Rene Descartes formulates his philosophical work through deductive reasoning and follows his work with his system of reasoning.... [tags: Free Will Essays]
2066 words (5.9 pages)
- There are three ways in which one is able to find truth: through reason (A is A), by utilizing the senses (paper burns) or by faith (God is all loving). As the period of the Renaissance came to a close, the popular paradigm for philosophers shifted from faith to reason and finally settling on the senses. Thinkers began to challenge authorities, including great teachers such as Aristotle and Plato, and through skepticism the modern world began. The French philosopher, René Descartes who implemented reason to find truth, as well as the British empiricist David Hume with his usage of analytic-synthetic distinction, most effectively utilized the practices of skepticism in the modern world.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical History Essays]
554 words (1.6 pages)
- Ideas of Descartes, Plato, and Hume The immediate starting-point of Plato's philosophical speculation was the Socratic teaching. In his attempt to define the conditions of knowledge so as to refute sophistic skepticism, Socrates had taught that the only true knowledge is a knowledge by means of concepts. The concept, he said, represents all the reality of a thing. As used by Socrates, this was merely a principle of knowledge. Plato took it up as a principle of Being. “If the concept represents all the reality of things, the reality must be something in the ideal order, not necessarily in the things themselves, but rather above them, in a world by itself” (Chaput, C.... [tags: Papers]
896 words (2.6 pages)
- In An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume demonstrates how there is no way to rationally make any claims about future occurrences. According to Hume knowledge of matters of fact come from previous experience. From building on this rationale, Hume goes on to prove how, as humans we can only make inferences on what will happen in the future, based on our experiences of the past. But he points out that we are incorrect to believe that we are justified in using our experience of the past as a means of evidence of what will happen in the future.... [tags: Philosophy Hume Philosophical Essays]
1020 words (2.9 pages)