Dred Scott was born a slave in the state of Virginia around the 1800's. Around 1833 he was purchased from his original owner, Peter Blow, by John Emerson, an officer in the United States Army. Dr. Emerson took Dred Scott to the free state of Illinois to live, and under it's constitution, he was eligible to be free. In around 1836, Dred Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin territory, a territory that was free under the Missouri compromise. It was in Wisconsin that Dred Scott met and married Harriet Robinson. John Emerson was transferred in 1837 to Ft. Jessup, Louisiana, were he met and married Irene Sandford. Dred Scott and his wife followed Dr. Emerson and his wife from duty station to duty station; they ended up in St. Louis Mo. In May 1840 Dr. Emerson was ordered to war in Florida. Dred Scott remained in St. Louis with his family and Mrs. Emerson. Dr. Emerson returned home after the war, and relocated to Iowa. This time he left the Scotts behind and rented them out. This would be the last time Scott would see Dr. Emerson. Dr. Emerson passed away in 1843, leaving the Scott family to his wife, Irene. In 1846 Dred Scott attempted to buy his freedom from Mrs. Emerson, who refused his offer. With the help and encouragement of John Anderson, their minister, Dred Scott decided to sue.
Dred Scott lost his first case in a lower St. Louis court because he could not prove that he was owned by the Emerson family at all. A second trial took place in January 1850, Dred Scott and his family were declared "Free." Unhappy with the decision, Mrs. Emerson appealed, and in 1852 the Missouri Supreme court reversed the decision. New attorneys were needed because his first attorney had passed away. ...
... middle of paper ...
...he Supreme Court was also considered the "worst ever rendered" and was overturned by the 13th and 14 amendment to the constitution. They abolished slavery and declared "all persons born in the United States to be citizens of the United States."
The argument of the Dred Scott case was not over human rights, but more of property rights. In the 1800's slaves were considered valuable property, like jewelry or cars. If Dr. Emerson would have driven his Porsche up to Illinois from Missouri, and it is illegal in Illinois to even own a vehicle, could his car be impounded once you returned to Missouri? Today society knows that this type of behavior is unacceptable. We also acknowledge that we as a society have grown and know better than that in this day and age. Americans and our political culture will continue to grow each and everyday, as we learn from our mistakes.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the mid to late 1800’s, America was a hard place to live in if you were a person of color. Slavery was still legal in the south during the 1800’s and was practised in the majority of the states. While slavery was legal in the South, it was outlawed in the North. With this being the case, a separation between slave states and non slave states, there needed to be a border to separate the two. This means that once this line was crossed, ideally, a slave would no longer be a slave. If he was not freed, there would be some sort of Consequence However, this was not the case when it came to the Dred Scott v.... [tags: Slavery in the United States, American Civil War]
1025 words (2.9 pages)
- Roger B. Taney and John McLean: On Dred Scott v. Sandford case Slavery was pervasive in the South of the United States, where virtually all states in this territory relied on cash crop farming and as such used the slaves to perform manual work. The slaves were treated harshly and subjected to horrible conditions to provide sordid labor. On the advent of President Abraham Lincoln’s rule, various reforms began that ushered in the battle for slave freedom. The northern states were utterly averse to slavery while about ten southern states clung on and defended it on the basis of managing their economy.... [tags: American Civil War, Slavery in the United States]
1111 words (3.2 pages)
- Dred Scott v. Sandford Dred Scott was born a slave in the state of Virginia around the 1800's. Around 1833 he was purchased from his original owner, Peter Blow, by John Emerson, an officer in the United States Army. Dr. Emerson took Dred Scott to the free state of Illinois to live, and under it's constitution, he was eligible to be free. In around 1836, Dred Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin territory, a territory that was free under the Missouri compromise. It was in Wisconsin that Dred Scott met and married Harriet Robinson.... [tags: Legal Law]
1089 words (3.1 pages)
- The landmark Supreme Court cases of Dred Scott v. Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas have had a tremendous effect on the struggle for equal rights in America. These marker cases have set the precedent for cases dealing with the issue of civil equality for the last 150 years. In 1846, a slave living in Missouri named Dred Scott, sued for his freedom on the basis that he had lived for a total of seven years in territories that were closed to slavery.... [tags: Landmark Civil Rights Cases]
844 words (2.4 pages)
- According to the Declaration of Independence, signed in 1776, "[...] all men are created equal, [and] they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." One would then expect that every man, would be entitled to their freedom, and it was true, for all white men. African-Americans, however, faced a very different reality. They were still forced into slavery, they were deprived of those rights that all men were meant to have.... [tags: Slavery]
736 words (2.1 pages)
- Dred Scott v. Sandford Was Dred Scott a free man or a slave. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case is about a slave named Dred Scott from Missouri who sued for his freedom. His owner, John Emerson, had taken Scott along with him to Illinois which was one of the states that prohibited slavery. Scott’s owner later passed away after returning back to Missouri. After suits and counter suits the case eventually made it to the Supreme Court with a 7-2 decision. Chief Justice Taney spoke for the majority, when saying that Dred Scott could not sue because he was not a citizen, also that congress did not have the constitutional power to abolish slavery, and that the Missouri compromise was unconstitution... [tags: American Civil War, Slavery in the United States]
951 words (2.7 pages)
- Dred Scott v. Sanford case of 1857 was a very controversial case in the United States. The Supreme Court ruling is considered to be the worst in history and one of the leading causes of the Civil War. The Supreme Court said that Americans of African descent, free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. This ruling was unconstitutional because the Constitution states that “all Men are created equal.” This ruling is also violating your 14th amendment rights. I don’t think there is a difference between legal and ethics.... [tags: Slavery in the United States]
1380 words (3.9 pages)
- Scott v. Sandford (1857) Dred Scott was held as a slave to Missouri resident Dr. John Emerson. In1834 Scott traveled with Dr. Emerson to the state of Illinois, and in 1836 to areas of present day Minnesota only to finally return back to Missouri in 1838. Slavery was forbidden in the state of Illinois and under the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was also forbidden in the traveled areas of Minnesota. Upon the death of his owner, Scott sued for his freedom on the grounds that since slavery was outlawed in the free territories he had temporarily resided in, he had become a “free” man there.... [tags: essays research papers]
885 words (2.5 pages)
- The Dred Scott Decision The Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court in March 1857 was one of the major steps on the road to secession. Dred Scott was a slave who was taken to Missouri from Virginia and sold. His new master then moved to Illinois (a free state) for a while but soon moved back to Missouri. Upon his master's death, Scott claimed that since he had resided in a free state, he was consequentially a free man. The case eventually made it to the Supreme Court. As stated by Supreme Court Justice C.... [tags: American History]
2548 words (7.3 pages)
- Dred Scott Case Justice vs Jurisdiction "Justice v. Jurisdiction, Research Paper on Dred Scott v. Sandford" Described as being poorly educated, indigent, feeble, and ill prone, Dred Scott seemed consistent with society's definition of the black slave. However, he was an articulate man who changed our society and American standards. Married to Harriet Scott with four (4) children, Dred wanted to provide his family with a sense of dignity and decency that a free man's status would warrant him. He was the cause of a change in how society viewed Negroes.... [tags: essays papers]
1907 words (5.4 pages)