It is undeniable that children literatures are consider as best tools to socialize a children in a society. Author use different methods like characters, themes and illustrations to provide knowledge and skills to understand a literature world that is similar to the real world. Children come to know how to survive in the society. Similarly, implementation of antagonist in children’s literature is a method that inculcate ability in children to fight for their rights and fight for goals that they want to achieve. So, Antagonist is a term in the children literature that resist the protagonist to achieve his goal. Antagonist plays very important role to develop character or protagonist character, bring climax in story and make the story interesting. …show more content…
So, inability or lack of ability to get something acts as an antagonist. Let’s understand it with an example, Tina who is Margaret mother, she never speak in front of his Husband, but she raised her voice for Margaret (Phillips, 134). Here fear was acts as an antagonist. She fights against her fear of husband and raised voice for the right of her daughter. Another example, Jesse does not like Leslie when they met first time to each other. Here is two internal antagonist, first is gender and second is mentality of Jesse. Jesse does not consider she is an appropriate friend for him. Even, she also demolish his dream of faster runner. Finally, Leslie efforts and her friendly behavior wins Jesse and they become a very good friends (Paterson). Let’s understand it with one more example, when Zulma tell the Harriet that shell missed her grandmother and wanted to go back in his country. Harriet (Margaret) decided to help her friend Zulma on same day. Although she was 16 year old children and she did not have power but she never lose her courage. First, she convinced her mother to help Zulma with help of Mrs.Billing. Then, they all women plan to send Zulma back and Harriet took step against her father. Finally, she get success to bring zulma back to Tobago after facing many …show more content…
Sometimes readers do not think about turning point, and this turning point brings a suspense in the story. Climax could be arise due to one antagonist or group of antagonist. Ether antagonist could be one of them internal, human and environmental or all. One day, Jesse go out with Miss Edmunds. When he came back to home and Brenda said "Your girlfriend’s dead, and Momma thought you was dead, too."(Paterson, 60). First Jess did not believe Leslie has died while she was swinging through rope to reach “Terabithia” and rope break and she fell down and die but later he had to believe. The rope which was a bridge to reach “Terabithia” world acts as antagonist. Here two suspense arise, first, Jesse lost his friend Leslie and he could not do magic in “Terabithia” without Leslie. She was only his friend who was the creator of “Terabithia”. Second is that who will do magic with “Terabithia” world because Jesse cannot do that. These type question will occur in the mind of reader and make the story interesting for reader. Sometime readers start guessing of next part of story. Children novels get more attractive for reader and read stories with more
Luke because he has been thought a metaphors that surprised me and most readers also. Was it good or not it for you to find out? Protagonist is depended on antagonist because protagonist is a good person, hero, the best, etc. To be a good person, hero, or best there must be other who will be against protagonist. These characters are antagonist. Protagonist is most of the time noting without antagonist. Antagonist is noting with protagonist because they are against them so both are depended on each other. The police officer that caught Luke was on tough man. He must have been hard working to caught Luke.
...his antagonist proves to be their own inner character which determines the trajectory of their decisions. As they all become aware, the consequences of their decisions prove to have an extensive impact on themselves and those around them.
Typically, a novel contains four basic parts: a beginning, middle, climax, and the end. The beginning sets the tone for the book and introduces the reader to the characters and the setting. The majority of the novel comes from middle where the plot takes place. The plot is what usually captures the reader’s attention and allows the reader to become mentally involved. Next, is the climax of the story. This is the point in the book where everything comes together and the reader’s attention is at the fullest. Finally, there is the end. In the end of a book, the reader is typically left asking no questions, and satisfied with the outcome of the previous events. However, in the novel The Things They Carried the setup of the book is quite different. This book is written in a genre of literature called “metafiction.” “Metafiction” is a term given to fictional story in which the author makes the reader question what is fiction and what is reality. This is very important in the setup of the Tim’s writing because it forces the reader to draw his or her own conclusion about the story. However, this is not one story at all; instead, O’Brien writes the book as if each chapter were its own short story. Although all the chapters have relation to one another, when reading the book, the reader is compelled to keep reading. It is almost as if the reader is listening to a “soldier storyteller” over a long period of time.
The word protagonist comes from the Greek word protagistes, meaning “One who plays the lead role.” The protagonist is forced to adapt to various conditions, and overcome many obstacles. A separate character or an omniscient narrator usually tells the protagonist’s story, but the protagonist himself can also tell it. While there is normally only one protagonist, there can more than one antagonist. The antagonist is the character that opposes the protagonist, and is usually responsible for the obstacles in his way. One common literary technique that is often used to rapidly change an audience’s viewpoint on a story is the use of a false protagonist. A false protagonist appears to the reader as the main character (the protagonist), but is suddenly removed from the picture completely. This removal is often accomplished by killing the false protagonist.
Many of the story’s aspects were dominated by setting a slow rise and crashing climax. There were many such climaxes, Pg. 2, Pg. 7, and Pg. 9, give this such evidence. The flow kept me interested, and would grasp my attention as a TV show would. Although is context was far from a TV show. There was much talk about civil lifestyles by the town folk, which were a particularly an odd selection of people to intervene in such a story. Although the reaction witnessed by this allowed us to get another insight, from a second person perspective.
In conclusion, the adults display supremacy various times in the novel, which leads to powerful, strong, and wilful adolescents. The adults maintain control to ensure they acquire what they desire and use the children to obtain it. As the novel progresses, one realizes that from the experiences that are gained, the children become more strong and powerful characters. Altogether, People are constantly manipulating others to reach goals and desires, but one needs to realize that their intentions may not be the other persons.
antagonist; whether to act according to his feelings and instincts, or to try to follow the
The antagonist in the story is Abner Snobes. Abner Snobes is a very angry and inconsiderate man who has hate and detestation for almost anybody who is not “blood-kin”, and he portrays that hatred and contempt throughout the story (qtd. In Volpe 163).
end. This essay will further show how both stories shared similar endings, while at the same time
Nowadays, children books are full field with morals and lesson to teach children how to behave and react in real life situations. A classic subject that teaches children is the rivalry between good and bad, where good defeats bad after a battle. An example of a children novel that explores in different ways the good versus the bad is The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, written by C.S Lewis. The author of this novel uses literary elements to demonstrate the idea of good and evil, an example of which would be characterisation. Aslan and the White Witch embody the characteristics of the good and the evil, two of which are their physical and psychological descriptions and their actions in the novel.
Identify the important turning points of the story. Which would be the climax, the point that determines the outcome?
In psychology, the term aggression refers to a range of behaviors that can result in both physical and psychological harm to oneself, others or objects in the environment. Aggression can take on a variety of forms, including: physical, verbal, mental, and emotional. Aggression can also serve a number of different purposes such as asserting dominance, to intimidate or threaten, or to express anger or hostility. Everyone has experienced anger at one point in their lives and some of us have channeled that anger into violence, perhaps by throwing a punch during a heated argument or after too many beers at the bar. Then there's aggression on an greater scale, in the form of murder, wars and genocide. Trying to understand what fuels the different levels of human aggression, from fist fights to nation-on-nation battle, has long preoccupied human biologists.
For a time, the main characters in a story, poem, or narrative were easily classified as either being a hero or a villain. A hero would be easy to identify by the traits he'd possess, such as bravery, honesty, selflessness, trustworthiness, courage, leadership, and more. The villain would be easy to identify as well, possessing traits such as maliciousness, deceitfulness, immorality, dark, wishing harm upon others, and more. But what if the character lacked the natural heroic qualities but wasn't a villain either? What if the person displayed personality flaws that would traditionally be associated with a villain, but has heroic intentions? These questions were finally answered with the emergence of the anti-hero in literature.
Behaviorism is a classic psychology approach to understanding an organism's social and cognitive skills. This field of psychology focuses on observable behavior including measuring types of communication and natural mannerisms. It is important to understand how individuals present and express themselves in their natural environments in order to recognize and further advance knowledge about psychological disorders. When it comes to determining and labeling psychological disorders, especially behavioral disorders, it can be tricky to make the correct diagnosis. Psychologists have to assess all of the characteristics and symptoms an individual possesses and stick to textbook definitions when it comes to properly formulating a diagnosis.