Divine Command : Divine Doctrine

880 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Where is the divine command theory used

Divine Command Ethics
Divine Command hypothesis highlights in the ethics of numerous current religions, including Judaism, Islam, the Baha 'i Faith, and Christianity, and also being a part of various more established polytheistic religions. In antiquated Athens, it was usually held that ethical truth was attached specifically to divine commands, and religious devotion was practically equal to profound quality. In spite of the fact that Christianity does not involve divine command hypothesis, it is normally connected with it. It can be a conceivable hypothesis to Christians in light of the fact that the conventional origination of God as the maker of the universe underpins the thought that he made good truths. The hypothesis is upheld by the Christian view that God is almighty since this suggests God makes moral truths, instead of good truths existing freely of him, which appears to be conflicting with his supremacy. Divine Command hypothesis is a meta-moral hypothesis which recommends that an activity 's status as ethically great is comparable to whether it is commanded by God. The hypothesis states that what is good is dictated by what God commands, and that to be good is to take after his Commands.
I am persuaded that a perfect command hypothesis of morals has more putting it all on the line than has been for the most part recognized. My objective in the present exposition is to influence you to share my conference or, at any rate to move than an inch, given the restricted extent of the barrier I offer. I will probably portray one type of heavenly command hypothesis and to shield it in some point of interest against one complaint. Further I should address myself essentially to one creator proclamation of this complaint since di...

... middle of paper ...

...lesome. He additionally fought that, as learning of God is required for profound quality by celestial Command hypothesis, nonbelievers and freethinkers couldn 't be moral; he saw this as a shortcoming of the hypothesis. Others have tested the hypothesis on good grounds by belligerence that, regardless of the fact that God 's Command and ethical quality relate in this world, they may not do as such in other conceivable universes. Likewise, the Euthyphro situation, initially proposed by Plato, exhibited a quandary which debilitated either to leave profound quality subject to the impulses of God, or test his transcendence. Divine Command hypothesis has likewise been condemned for its clear incongruently with the omnibenevolence of God, good self-governance and religious pluralism, albeit a few researchers have endeavored to shield the hypothesis from these difficulties.

Show More
Related

  • Morality In Martin Luther King's A Letter From Birmingham Jail

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality derives from the Latin moralitas meaning, “manner, character, or proper behavior.” In light of this translation, the definition invites the question of what composes “proper behavior” and who defines morality through these behaviors, whether that be God, humanity, or an amalgamation of both. Socrates confronted the moral dilemma in his discourses millennia ago, Plato refined his concepts in his Republic, and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi would commit their life work to defining and applying the term to political reform. Finally, after so many years, Martin Luther King’s “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” reaches a consensus on the definition of morality, one that weighs the concepts of justice and injustice to describe morality as the

    Read More

  • Philippa Foot Analysis

    1518 Words  | 4 Pages

    Then what, Foot asks, could the real reason for morality’s special authority be? Nothing, she answers — premise 3. She says that it might seem that morality has a special dignity because of strength of teaching. We are taught that morality has special command over us in virtue of its being a system of categorical imperatives, so we feel like it has that authority. But in reality, Foot says, there is no magical must. She can find no satisfactory explanation for morality to have special authority, so she decides that it does

    Read More

  • The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. H. J. Paton. 1964. Reprint. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2009.

    Read More

  • Argument Regarding The Divine Command Theory

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    Broadly, the divine command theory is a religious moral code in which God’s commands determine what human beings should or should not do. As such, it is expected for theists to subscribe to the divine command theory of morality. The deontological interpretation of the divine command theory separates actions into one of the following categories: mandatory for human beings to perform, prohibited for human beings to perform, or optional for human beings to perform. Those actions that are mandatory to perform are ones which have been expressly commanded by God. Failing to commit a mandatory action would be defying God’s commands, and thus, according to the divine command theory of morality, immoral. Actions that are prohibited are ones that God expressly commands human beings do not perform. Consequently, to perform a prohibited action would be immoral. Finally, those actions that God does not expressly command that human beings should perform or should avoid performing are optional; there are no moral implications to performing or not performing such acts. The rightness or wrongness of an action is inherently and wholly dependent upon th...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Plato's Euthyphro Dilemma

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    ​Dating all the way back to ancient Greece, Plato raised a challenge by merely asking, “Is it right because God commands it, or does God command it because it’s right?” Nowadays, this simple yet complex question poses a problem to modern day Christians. When understanding this question, you are forced to believe you only have one of two choices to accept. Those being either it is right because God commands it or God commands it because it is right. If it is right because God commands it then anything, specifically evil, could be right. On the other hand, if God commands it because it is right then the standard of goodness is no longer. Both options are hostile to Christianity. However, after further investigation, there is a third option: God’s very nature is the standard of goodness. By closely examining Plato’s Euthyphro Dilemma, it’s clear that a theist should undoubtedly accept the third option, being that of God’s nature is the standard of goodness.

    Read More

  • Divine Command Theory Research

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Divine Command theory of ethics is a theory that states that an act is right or wrong and good or bad based on whether or not God commands or prohibits us from doing it. This means that the only thing that makes an action morally wrong is because God says it is. There are two sides to this theory; the restricted and the unrestricted. The restricted theory basically says that an action is obligatory if and only if it is good and God commanded it; the unrestricted theory states that an act is only obligatory if it is commanded by God, it is not obligatory if it is prohibited by God and it is optional if and only if God has not commanded nor prohibited it.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Divine Command Theory

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    For many years now, people have always wondered what ethical principle is the right one to follow. These individuals are all seeking the answer to the question that the ethical principles are trying to clarify: What defines moral behavior? The Divine Command Theory and the theories of cultural relativism are two principles of many out there that provide us with explanations on what our ethical decisions are based on and what we consider to be our moral compass in life. Even though these two theories make well-supported arguments on why they are the right principle to follow, it is hard to pinpoint which one should guide our choices because of the wide array of ethical systems. Therefore, what is morally right or wrong differs greatly depending

    Read More

  • Ethical Theories (Midterm Exam)

    1879 Words  | 4 Pages

    Divine command states that what is moral is determined by what God commands, and that to be moral is to follow his commands. For example, Jehovah’s witnesses do not allow blood fusions because their scriptures say humans are not allowed to drink blood; although blood transfusions are allowed for children. Even though modern society does not condemn blood transfusions many Jehovah’s witnesses do not allow blood transfusions because they believe God does not allow blood transfusions. God is the almighty, and what he commands is morally right. Another concrete application of divine command theory is the five pillars of Islam. One must devote his life to following the five pillars; the pillars are correct because God insists upon it. Every Muslim is obliged to believe that there is no other God than Allah, ritual prayer must be done five times a day facing the holy city Mecca, fasting must be done during the month of Ramadan, give at least 2.5% savings to the poor, and make a visit to Mecca at least once in a person’s life time. People follow divine command to the fullest because it is moral to follow God’s commands.

    Read More

  • The Divine Command Theory

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to understand divine command theory we must first understand the nature of God and Morality. So we will start by taking a look at what makes an action moral. Once we understand what makes an action moral, we can then try to understand the author's’ viewpoint on the divine command theory of ethics. Understanding the viewpoint will allow us to dissect the author’s viewpoints and come up with counter-arguments that the author must then contend with.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    If we desire X, we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations: the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morality, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viability of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.

    Read More

  • Moral Relativism

    1958 Words  | 4 Pages

    Harman, G. (2000). Is there a single true morality?. Explaining value and other essays in moral philosophy (pp. 77-99). Oxford: Clarendon Press ;.

    Read More

  • Holiness Cultivates In The Debate

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    The principle of holiness came up in Socrates and Euthyphro debate as the two discussed whether or not holiness was something that the gods indeed loved or if holiness was something that the gods loved because it was in fact holy. The concept of holiness between the two is prominent because they needed to know exactly how the gods broke down and acknowledged the holiness. This was a major factor because it basically set standards and laws for people that really chose to worship. It basically breaks down if an act is holy or if the act was something that was adopted by a particular god and made holy. In this paper I will explain how the concept of holiness cultivates in the discussion and why it takes a prominent position between the two.

    Read More

  • Natural Law Vs Divine Command Theory

    648 Words  | 2 Pages

    For instance, not all of the Ten Commandants go along with the time we are living in. One of the Ten Commandants says we should not take the name of the Lord in vain and nowadays it’s something we do everyday. In addition, religious followers may decide to act in a harmful or negative way in society and defend themselves by saying that God had commanded them to do it; which may lead to extreme religions, where its followers may take every word of the book to heart and try to implement those views on their society. On another note, our society can have this as our moral system because of different religions and of atheist because, since they believe in other values. With the Divine Command it makes us question on whether who came first, God or right. When comparing the Divine Command with the Minimum Conception, it can be deduced that both are very differing from each other. One of the reasons being that with the Divine Command God chose for us what it’s right or wrong and if it became a moral system, atheists will feel out of place because they have a different set of believe just like other religions.

    Read More

  • If God Does Not Exist, Then Everything Is Permitted

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many of us have wondered about the role of a Deity, in defining our moral code, and this has been a subject of discourse among scholars and philosophers since centuries. Many define morality as the innate ability of the human conscience to draw input for decisions which they believe is present there by itself. While some say that the (belief on the) presence of God gives them strength and inspiration to overcome their inability to follow moral standards (which are already defined) especially when they conflict with their self-interests. Although, some people argue that social stimulus imposes limits to one’s actions even if God does not exist. However, a person is at absolute liberty to perform, whatsoever one wants to in the non-existence of God because one does not regard anything as right or wrong in absence of objective moral principles and does not fear any Divine judgement.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Christian Morality

    1383 Words  | 3 Pages

    When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.

    Read More

More about Divine Command : Divine Doctrine

Open Document