Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
iq testing and intelligence
essay on theories of intelligence
essay on theories of intelligence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: iq testing and intelligence
Do Intelligence and Creativity Decline with Age?
This is a topic dear to my own heart. From a personal perspective, I never expected my intelligence and creativity to be stronger now that it was in my younger years. Don’t get me wrong, I was pretty good back then too but now it’s completely different, and I also know that I am not the norm. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if that could be the norm? This is not an essay about my personal feelings, because as I’ve come to realize during this college journey, that there is so much more. Albert Einstein was 26-years old, according to our textbook, when he said that “a person who has not made his great contribution to science before the age of 30 will never do so.” Is that true? Regardless to
…show more content…
What I found very interesting, and did not know before, was found in the writings of this controversy and that was the different types of intelligence. Fluid intelligence is defined as intelligence that one would apply to learning new tasks and the ability to come up with solutions to unforeseen problems. Crystallized intelligence reflects accumulated past experiences as well as socialized learning. Fluid intelligence focuses on creating, while crystallized intelligence reflects the wisdom received from accumulated experiences over a person’s lifetime. While there are many forms of intelligence testing, such as the IQ Test, creativity can’t be measured. Researchers have always questions what is actually measured with these intelligence tests. They have realized the complex relationship between intelligence and age. Studies show that while it may take a 70-year-old longer to remember something than it would a 20-year-old, when hypothetical issues are posed it is the 70-year-old who excels. When it comes to wisdom, which was previously
Life gives us the opportunity to act and behave in ways that would make us either live a happy or dreadful life. Human intelligence is the basis of our society and can either make us unhappy or happy. In the novel, Fifteen Dogs by Andre Alexis, the two human Gods, Apollo and Hermes make a bet on if an animal had human intelligence, would they have a happy life? As they were bickering upon this bet, they passed a veterinary clinic. They then enter the clinic to realize majority of the animals were dogs, therefore, that was the animal that was chosen for their bet. Throughout the novel, fifteen dogs have the challenge of having human abilities. The two dogs, Majnoun and Prince, both live a life with human intelligence but very differently.
Charles Spearman's model of intelligence and Howard Gardner's multiple intelligence theory are two of the most widely used theories of intelligence. In order to understand how similar the two theories are we must first understand their differences. These two men differed in opinion on how IQ and intelligence should be measured, and they differed in opinion on what made a person "smart". In order to examine these things they first had to understand the human brain and how it works. They had to examine the human study habits and rituals, along with the human test taking habits.
In Carol Dweck’s “Brainology” the article explains how our brain is always being altered by our experiences and knowledge during our lifespan. For this Dweck conducted a research in what students believe about their own brain and their thoughts in their intelligence. They were questioned, if intelligence was something fixed or if it could grow and change; and how this affected their motivation, learning, and academic achievements. The response to it came with different points of views, beliefs, or mindset in which created different behavior and learning tendencies. These two mindsets are call fixed and growth mindsets. In a fixed mindset, the individual believes that intelligence is something already obtain and that is it. They worry if they
The main debate is about what intelligence actually is, who possesses it, and how can it be calculated? There are two approaches to this dispute, nature versus nurture. According to Exploring Psychology in Modules, the nature-nurture issue is the controversy over the relative contributions of biology and experience (6). On the nature side of things, psychometricians evaluate what proportion of intelligence is instinctive by examining IQ statistics. Conversely, cultural ecologists back up the nurture idea by bringing to light that intelligence is always changing and never the same thanks to our everyday experiences, thus making tests of intelligence unfair. These two groups of scientists have diverse techniques, which leads to the research not being able to be collaborated.
Conscious growth has been the central focus of my life for many years. I study what it means to grow and how we can deliberately invite, process, and integrate new growth experiences.
If social institutions do not embrace the concept of Intellectual Diversity, then future adults are somewhat doomed because both perceptio...
Rossman, B. B., & Gollob, H. F. (1975). Comparison of social judgments of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 271-281.
Describe two or three of your current intellectual interests and why they are exciting to you. Why will Cornell's College of Arts and Sciences be the right environment in which to pursue your interests? (Please limit your response to 650 words.)
In a 1921 symposium entitled “Intelligence and Its Measurement”, psychiatrists were asked to define intelligence and their answers varied greatly. One described intelligence as “equivalent to the capacity to learn.” Other definitions included “the ability to adapt adequately to relatively new situations”, “the capacity to learn or profit from experience”, and “the knowledge that an individual possesses.” And one stated that there was no simple definition to the word because “intelligence involves two factors- the capacity for knowledge and knowledge possessed” (Sternberg & Detterman, 1986, p.39-40).
Intelligence has been commonly thought to decline as we get older, however this is a flawed belief. Countless individuals will argue that there are various cognitive processes that are associated with changes in the brain that do deteriorate with time, however there are also other brain areas that increase their activity in older age. I believe a person’s ability to perform certain tasks may become slower as they get older, but this doesn’t automatically mean that they are cognitively getting less intelligent. There are numerous ways in which intelligence can be defined, although it is commonly defined as general cognitive skills, this means that it is a mental ability involved in the capacity of learning, reasoning, perceiving relationships and analogies, understanding, facts, meanings, etc. (Dictionary definition). However Raymond Cattell (1963) argued that ‘intelligence does not generally consist of only cognitive performance’. Cattell and Horns theory developed in 1966 and emphasises that intelligence is composed of a number of different abilities that interrelate to form the broad term of intelligence. The main two factors are crystallised and Fluid intelligence.
I suddenly awake to the ear-piercing sound of my alarm clock, and aimlessly hunt for the snooze button while an immediate thought dwells upon me: “Why am I doing this?” The clock reads 4:30 AM; all is dreary and silent. My fatigued body and consciousness feels completely depleted of strength. While trying to force my weary eyes open, still lying relaxed in my warm cocoon, an overwhelming sense of apathy consumes me. “Maybe I ought to call in sick.” Although despite all my pondering, and the hypnotic force of my bed, I manage to arise each morning at this barren hour to unite with my running group for brutal training.
The ongoing debate on whether nature or nurture is responsible for intelligence seems to be a never-ending argument. There will probably be no definite answer to this argument any time soon, but answers such as Dr. Bigot's prove how intolerant of other opinions people can be. To say intelligence is entirely based on genetics, or one's environment, for that matter, is utterly extremist. An interaction of both nature and nurture is responsible for intelligence.
“Intelligence is conventionally defined by a single number-an IQ-representing a cohort specific index comparing the performance of a group of individuals of the same age on a battery of sub-tests designed to assess different intellectual skills” (Brody, 1999). In other words, individuals are born with a comparatively intellectual potential (I.Q.) which is thought to be profoundly influenced by the heredity of the individual and reasonably difficult to change.
To most people, intelligence comes in the form of IQ points. When people do well in school, they are automatically considered intelligent. Those who decide not to pursue extra education are often thought to be less than those who do go further. In reality, intelligence comes in a variety of forms, eight to be exact. Humans have a mixture of these intelligences, whether they are natural or are learned. Often, a more prominent intelligence emerges and is supported by the other minor ones. Personally, I find myself to be predominantly logical/mathematical, followed by linguistic, musical and finally interpersonal.
I strongly believe that people of my generation are smarter and more intelligent than our ancestors, while my grandparents disagree with this idea. I see that the present-day discovery of scientific facts and modern technology help shaping our idea of the world and lead us to the better understanding of the world, by giving us skill of swiftness, convenient access to information and fact of nature, and correcting the false myths. Also, brand-new style of teaching allows kids these days to be more creative and confident than those in the old days, as students are allowed to use ask their teacher when in doubt, and join an open discussion in class.