In fact, I believe in a welfare assist community or society because not everyone is lucky to be born with certain pro, for example, inheritances, legacies, great neighborhoods, and etc. In thus, Mr. John Rawls’ philosophy of welfare liberalism is the theory I agree with, rather than Robert Nozick’s belief of classical liberalism. John Rawls’ type of justice is equal opportunities, but Nozick believes in ownership of property and free choice. Having a free choice for each person within the society, also creates problems for the society as a whole because it leads to the involvement of the economy and other social issues that we face now. For instance, a issue you face as a society when it comes to free choice for women, and even families are the option of abortion.
Now, justice of fairne...
... middle of paper ...
... with Mr. Nozick because legitimate means should not determine your distribution of wealth. However, I like that with Mr. Nozick’s theory when something is being earned or taken by a negative action it is unjust, and the person that is the victim should be repaid until their holding is back just.
In Conclusion, I believe in equal opportunities for the types of justices, so I would be a welfare liberalism. This is the distribution that John Rawls believes is philosophical correct when you discuss the issue of wealth. Of course, there are some problems when it comes to his two principles of justice, but it seems more beneficial as a whole for a progressing society. However, It’s areas where I could agree with Mr. Nozick distribution of wealth, but if people are looking for lifetime advantages this type of justice, which is entitlement and free choice is not the way.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the complexity of political thought, many thinkers have a set of principles for deciding questions regarding the balance of equality, freedom, and social justice. For political thinkers like John Rawls, Robert Dahl, Robert Nozick, and Michael Walzer—each grasp a different perspective on how and whether it is acceptable to redistribute resources in order to promote material equality. Of these authors, I find John Rawls’ argument most appealing. In his work A Theory of Justice, he states “All social values—liberty and opportunity, income and wealth, and the bases of self-respect—are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution of any, or all, of these values is to everyone 's... [tags: Political philosophy, John Rawls, Justice]
1583 words (4.5 pages)
- Rawls vs Nozick John Rawls and Robert Nozick both provide compelling and thought provoking theories regarding the values of liberty and equality. Rawls focuses on both liberty and equality while Nozick theorizes exclusively on liberty. The ideas of Rawls and Nozick have multiple strengths as well as weaknesses which allow for debate and comparison between the two theories. John Rawls was more in agreement with the works of Locke and Rousseau; however, Rawls disagreed with the notion that the State of Nature was a historical situation as opposed to something hypothetical; Rawls instead believed an original position of equality which I agree with (917).... [tags: Political philosophy, John Rawls, Liberalism]
792 words (2.3 pages)
- Robert Nozick uses the example of Wilt Chamberlain to develop his theories on entitlement and distribution by establishing his libertarian view of justice in chapter 7 of his book "Anarchy, Stat, And Utopia" . Wilt Chamberlain, the basketball star, charges fans twenty-five cents to watch him play. Nozick creates a world in which we are to assume that the actions leading to this point, for all people, are just. Chamberlain simply offers his services to those who wish to attend the event. Assuming that he continues his show for some time, and people continue to pay the twenty-five cent fee, Chamberlain could generate a great deal of revenue.... [tags: philosophical, ownership, inequality]
895 words (2.6 pages)
- The relationship between justice and the good is and has been debated for thousands of years between many intelligent philosophers. Many theorists have attempted to to explain the exact characteristics and outline a moral distribution of possessions. From just after the First World War to present day, liberal perspectives emerged and flourished across a variety of ideological theories and continue to influence political thinking in regards to rights, equality and freedom. With this emergence came two very influential theorists in libertarian political philosophy, Robert Nozick and John Rawls, who take very different approaches to how justice relates to the good.... [tags: Robert Nozick, John Rawls, liberty]
1558 words (4.5 pages)
- In the United States, the gap between the rich and the poor has been substantially increasing over the years. This growth between the rich and poor illustrates the wealth inequality between the social classes in our nation. Although it is impractical to precisely measure the morality of wealth inequality, we can use philosophical thought to determine what makes a political and economic system just. By analyzing the theories of political philosophers, Robert Nozick and John Rawls, it is clear that wealth inequality is morally justified, as long as equal opportunity and concern for justice among a society is provided under certain conditions. Wealth inequality relates to race, gen... [tags: justification theories, equal opportunity]
1112 words (3.2 pages)
- Any Lockeian scholar would be lying if they told you that any topic in the secondary literature on the Two Treatises of Government was more famous (or infamousÉdepending on who you talk to), widely debated, or caused more controversy than the old Oxford gradÕs theory of property. Some are shouting from the left that Locke argues a rights claim for subsistence for all individuals, that it may even support MarxÕs theory of exploitation. Yelling back are those from the right who claim that he formulates a moral justification for capitalist appropriation of property.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
3210 words (9.2 pages)
- When making a controversial point or claim, it is often useful to have data to back it up. In discussing the inequality of wealth distribution in America, the data is not controversial but rather the impact it could have on different policies and governing techniques. In order to understand the best way to react to this data that shows a wealth gap is to look to the great minds of the past and their thoughts on economic inequality. One philosopher who spent a great deal of time discussing the implications and repercussions of economic inequality was Aristotle in his writing Politics.... [tags: Economic inequality, Distribution of wealth]
1274 words (3.6 pages)
- Surviving in America has become increasingly more difficult due to the Government’s lack of oversight which causes the income gap to increase and the middle class to disappear. Due to an extreme gap of income between the wealthiest 1% and the remaining 99% in America, the middle class is dissipating to nothing because of unequal distribution of wealth. Poverty in America is a major issue that can and should be addressed as soon as possible because unequal distribution of wealth is causing greed, controversy and hate among millions of citizens.... [tags: Economic inequality, Distribution of wealth]
1266 words (3.6 pages)
- Everyone has his or her own ideas of how wealth should be distributed properly. Some people believe wealth should be left to family, left for public services, or become the property of others. Others believe that people should not have excess wealth, resulting in non-existent class distinctions. An alternative view is that wealth is not distributed; instead, the wealthy continue to grow wealthier while those in poverty can not escape it and fall further into a life of poverty. The beliefs discussed above come from three different writers.... [tags: Andrew Carnegie, Karl Marx, Robert B Reich]
877 words (2.5 pages)
- In his 1975 book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Robert Nozick introduced a now famous thought experiment he entitled "The Experience Machine." Nozick believes that this intuition pump successfully demonstrates that hedonism is false and that human beings do value things other than happiness and pleasure as goods in themselves, namely "authenticity" and the like. In this paper, I will offer a thorough exegesis of the Experience Machine thought experiment and attempt to show that it fails to establish that something like authenticity could serve as a potential normative foundation.... [tags: Robert Nozick Anarchy State and Utopia]
3406 words (9.7 pages)