Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Protectionism in developed countries
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Protectionism in developed countries
Trade disputes have been around for many years. The disputes amongst the US and the EU only cover a very small section of their bilateral trade. In recent years a lot of the disputes were beneficial to the consumers both here in the U.S. and also the EU. The trade policies of both countries were based on the GATT and now the WTO is being used. Disputes that are referred to the WTO findings would be resolved and greatly eased if the U.S. & the EU were less confrontational.
The U.S. & European Union trade disputes are beneficial to consumers. Trade between the U.S. & the European Union makes up almost half of world trade and is also considered a part of the transatlantic free trade. Common values, overlapping interests, and shared goals are the foundation of what is often described as the transatlantic partnership between the United States and Europe (Mix 2013). Amongst these large trading partners there are disagreements that will surely arise. These issues range from individual cases all the way to trade policies. The disagreements are political, economic, and ethical. Both the United States and European Union are a part of the WTO (World Trade Organization) so disputes have to be handled according to certain polices. The nature of trade disputes has changed drastically since years past. In March 2013, the European Commission proposed negotiating guidelines to the Member states and released an impact Also the cooperation of the WTO is assumed to not continue into the future so new ways of resolving disputes will need to be implemented.
The poultry dispute between the U.S. and EU is an ongoing event since 1997. The dispute is as a result of the European Union banning meat from the United States that was cleaned with an antimicro...
... middle of paper ...
...as it should. Nevertheless the U.S. won the dispute because the EU did not process the reports and they had to do so because there were no findings of GM products being harmful.
In conclusion, the trade disputes are beneficial. The United States & the European Union are some of the world’s biggest traders. The benefit of them not disputing would be profitable but thankfully the EU considers their consumers. The disputes are also beneficial for the consumers sake. If it wasn’t for the EU taking the stance like they have then some of these terrible conditions would have taken place a lot longer probably when it was too late. The health of the consumers should be the number one goal over profit no matter what. It’s very shameful how easy products enter the market to be sold with little to no research. The United States should adapt some key principles from the EU.
Nestle, Marion. Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003.
The Meat Inspection Act of 1906 was an attempt to regulate the meatpacking industry and to assure consumers that the meat they were eating was safe. In brief, this act made compulsory the careful inspection of meat before its consummation, established sanitary standards for slaughterhouses and processing plants, and required continuous U.S. Department of Agriculture inspection of meat processing and packaging. Yet, the most important objectives set by the law are the prevention of adulterated or misbranded livestock and products from being commercialized and sold as food, and the making sure that meat and all its products are processed and prepared in the adequate sanitary and hygienic conditions (Reeves 35). Imported meat and its various products are no exception to these conditions; they must be inspected under equivalent foreign standards.
The United States has for over two centuries been involved in the growing world economy. While the U.S. post revolutionary war sought to protect itself from outside influences has since the great depression and world war two looked to break trade restrictions. The United States role in the global economy has grown throughout the 20th century and as a result of several historical events has adopted positions of both benefactor and dependent. The United States trade policy has over time shifted from isolationist protectionism to a commitment to establishing world-wide free trade. Free trade enterprise has developed and grown through organizations such as the WTO and NAFTA. The U.S. in order to obtain its free trade desires has implemented a number of policies that can be examined for both their benefits and flaws. Several trade policies exist as options to the United States, among these fair trade and free trade policies dominate the world economic market. In order to achieve economic growth the United States has a duty to maintain a global trade policy that benefits both domestic workers and industry. While free trade gives opportunities to large industries and wealthy corporate investors the American worker suffers job instability and lower wages. However fair trade policies that protect America’s workers do not help foster wide economic growth. The United States must then engage in economic trade policies that both protect the United States founding principles and secure for tomorrow greater economic stability.
Trading internationally, along with foreign trading policies has always been a controversial issue in America. Free trade is just as taboo if not more so. Today, the United States has made an attempt to maintain an open market of trading. Free trading greatly benefits a nation’s economy. The history of trade in The United States dates back over half a century ago. Through a substantial part of history, the United States had implemented rather extensive barriers and restrictions regarding importation, in order to better protect domestic suppliers from any serious foreign rivalry. Regardless, of Government restrictions and barriers set in place to avoid foreign competition it is healthy for our nation to have motivation and have the desire to
To give background on the FDA and USDA for better understanding the USDA is responsible for meat and poultry, while the FDA is responsible for dairy, seafood, and vegetables. The USDA was founded in 1862 to encourage food creation in the United States (Sherrow 15). Dr. Peter Collier was the first person to suggest rules and laws for the safety of our food (Sherrow 15). Congress passed the Meat Inspection Act in 1890. The Act made the USDA inspectors inspect all pig products (Sherrow 15). In 1906 the Comprehensive Meat Inspection Act was passed. The act assigned inspectors from the UDSA to the United States’ 163 slaughter houses. In the slaughter houses the meat needed to be inspected before and after slaughter (Sherrow 15-16). The FDA is also responsible for protecting food from terrorists and anyone who wants to try to harm the public (Wilson). The FDA oversees 167,000 farms in the United States and 421,000 worldwide farms. The FDA only has 1,100 inspectors to inspect those farms (Wilson). The number of inspections done by the FDA went from 4,573 in 2005 to 3,400 in 2006 (Sherrow 34). According to the Center of Science in the Public Interest the FDA has no authority for prev...
On January 4, 2011 President Obama signed into law The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). This law has shed new light on the safety and security of our food supply. The last update to the food safety laws in the United States was in 1938. The food safety modernization act pays special attention at trying to modernize the food safety policies in the United States in hopes to prevent problems and concerns before they happen. As we all know, most of our food comes from overseas or sometimes from your neighboring state. The food products travel by car, truck, airplane, boat, or even train. We are all very happy to be receiving our bananas from Costa Rica and all of our other fresh fruits and vegetables that are imported into the United States, but we never stop to think about what pathogens are contaminating our produce and other foods on the way over and if they are safe for us to eat. In an article by Neal Fortin, he states that the law also gives the FDA new standards to hold imported foods to the domestic food standards and it also encourages the FDA to establish and develo...
"Record-High Antibiotic Sales for Meat and Poultry Production." pewhealth.org. The Pew Charitable Trust, 6 Feb. 2013. Web. 20 May 2014. .
For as long as there have been horse slaughterhouses in the United States, they have been an issue of controversy (Associated Press State and Local Wire, 8/7/01). Currently, only two slaughterhouses that produce horse meat intended...
Globalization has become one of the most influential forces in the twentieth century. International integration of world views, products, trade and ideas has caused a variety of states to blur the lines of their borders and be open to an international perspective. The merger of the Europeans Union, the ASEAN group in the Pacific and NAFTA in North America is reflective of the notion of globalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement was the largest free trade zone in the world at its conception and set an example for the future of liberalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement is coming into it's twentieth anniversary on January 1st, 2014. 1 NAFTA not only sought to enhance the trade of goods and services across the borders of Canada, US and Mexico but it fostered shared interest in investment, transportation, communication, border relations, as well as environmental and labour issues. The North American Free Trade Agreement was groundbreaking because it included Mexico in the arrangement.2 Mexico was a much poorer, culturally different and protective country in comparison to the likes of Canada and the United States. Many members of the U.S Congress were against the agreement because they did not want to enter into an agreement with a country that had an authoritarian regime, human rights violations and a flawed electoral system.3 Both Canadians and Americans alike, feared that Mexico's lower wages and lax human rights laws would generate massive job losses in their respected economies. Issues of sovereignty came into play throughout discussions of the North American Free Trade Agreement in Canada. Many found issue with the fact that bureaucrats and politicians from alien countries would be making deci...
Tom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Services, Livestock Slaughter. 2005 Summary, March 2006: USDA, NASS, Poultry Slaughter: 2005
Does the World Trade Organization in this case represent a loss of U.S. national sovereignty? Why do you think the WTO sided with the European Union?
...ation of specialized commissions to regulate and control the industry. The United States and the European Union have similar vested interests in stability and terrorism prevention and trade. Some of the Consequences of the EU and the United States interaction for international politics are, in most cases that going into conflicts may ultimately delay the effectiveness of the nation-states ability to influence as a world leader.
Political arguments for trade intervention are mainly concerned with protecting the interests of certain groups at the expense of other groups. Most of the time domestic firms benefit from this, while customers suffer the consequences.
Cook, Kate and David Bowles. " Growing Pains: The Developing Relationship of Animal Welfare Standards and the World Trade Rules. " Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 19.2 (2010): 227-238. Academic Search Premier -. EBSCO. Web.
Embracing the concept of free trade means that a government does not influence the trade by imposing sanctions but rather has a laissez-faire approach that allows the international market to decide which product has the comparative advantage. The global economy runs on this assumption but not all “play” by the same rules. The United States has limited sanctions imposed on free trade, allowing the free market to operate across the world. The United States’ approach to free trade is much like our approach to the US Olympic Team. Our athletes are unpaid volunteers that often fund their Olympic quest with sponsorships. As our metal count often shows, you do not always “win” ...