Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction fior if pluto should be a planet
Classifying organisms quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction fior if pluto should be a planet
When I was a child, I vividly remembered an anime series called Sailor Moon. The plot revolved around nine superheroes who were named after the nine planets of the solar system. As a child, I could recall the theme song of the series, which begins with “She is the one named Sailor, Sailor Venus, Sailor Mercury, Sailor Mars, Sailor Jupiter,...She is the one named Sailor Moon.” One day, my sister came up to me and told me that Pluto was no longer a planet. When she told me I could not believe my ears, they took out Pluto from the solar system. Recalling the moment that Pluto was removed as planet, I questioned what criteria decided the removal of it from the solar system. At the same time, these changes are made by scientists who believe it does …show more content…
We continue to search in the universe to find intelligent life that may exist on Mars. However, it is not necessary to find life out in the universe as there are still many mysteries that surrounds humans. For example, the diseases that we are still not immune to still need vaccines and cancer that still kills millions still needs a cure. Nevertheless, these discoveries paved the way for us to understand why there is such a huge and extraordinarily universe out there. In addition, classification assist our understanding of the universe as it simplifies the complexity of the universe. At the same time, without classification, there would be no possible way to talk about these objects or things. According to Tom Hothem’s lecture, classification allows us to interpret what we know and if we cannot talk about then it would impossible to classify whatever we are talking about. This reveals that everything we know is classified and if there were no classification then we would not know how to address and classify information to others. However, classification is not absolute and exclusive, as what we know today may have evolved or changed from the past (Hothem, Lecture). In other words, classification is not a perfect system and may have some flaws that are attached when classifying objects, things, or …show more content…
Some issues that may arise are if the term meant to describe such object, or the term does not describe what we could learn from the object. The reason is that science is always evolving as new perspectives are constantly in a battle with new information about the universe and life. For instance, the term “planet” comes into question as there were several controversies about the planet called Pluto. The main issue was that Pluto is no longer considered the ninth planet of the solar system. According to the movie, The Pluto Files, it revealed that the classification term “planet” was an issue concerning Pluto not being a planet. It no longer represented a planet as it lacked the criteria that fit the other eight planets. Pluto compared to other planets was just too small, even with the comparison of Mercury, it was still considered too small (The Pluto Files). At the same time, Pluto neither qualifies the description of a terrestrial or giant planet, eventually leading its removal for the planets of the solar system (The Pluto Files). This explains that there is a criteria that is unknown to us and it decides whether or not Pluto is a planet or not. This eventually leads to several individuals to feel it was wrong to remove Pluto as planet as many grew up thinking it was the 9th planet of the solar system (The Pluto
This includes the introduction of the heliocentric model and the debate about pluto being a planet, that ended up changing view points on many topics.
“The Secret History of the Women Who Got Us Beyond the Moon,” written by Simon Worrall, takes a more direct approach than its counterpart. Rather than using many quotations and pictures to drive the argument home, Worrall conducts an interview of Nathalia Holt, the author of the book that the article focuses on. Worrall most heavily uses the rhetorical device induction, particularly with the interview’s arrangement. Opening questions of the article covered the general topic of the book and the article, such as: “Who are the rocket girls?”; “Why have we never heard of them?”; and “What drew you to this story, Nathalia?” Worrall later uses more specific questions to narrow down his argument to a more definite point, but his argument turns slowly
subcategories such as "Gas Giants", "Terrestrial Planets (Pluto being one of them)" and "Asteroids". They also
“Fighting evil by moonlight, winning love by daylight, never running from a real fight, she is the one named Sailor Moon.” (Price) This is the theme song for the series, Sailor Moon, which follows the journey of a middle school girl, who gets magical powers one day from a cat who tells her she must fight evil forces that are trying to destroy the world. Along the way she meets new friends and discovers who she really is. The series has made a huge impact on many people around the world but for a great reason, which is why the sailor scouts are considered heroes but more than typical ones that you would see. The sailor scouts are all heroes on both a typical level and on a deeper level, that still make an impact on people.
Although Pluto was discovered in 1930, limited information on the distant planet delayed a realistic understanding of its characteristics. Today Pluto remains the only planet that has not been visited by a spacecraft, yet an increasing amount of information is unfolding about this peculiar planet. The uniqueness of Pluto's orbit, rotational relationship with its satellite, spin axis, and light variations all give the planet a certain appeal.
There is a modest version and a robust version of descriptive philosophy of science. The aim of the modest version is the historical reconstruction of actual evaluative practice. Given that scientists preferred one theory (explanation, research strategy...) to a second, the modest descriptivist seeks to uncover the evaluative standards whose application led to this preference. For instance, the modest descriptivist may seek to uncover the standards implicit within such evaluative decisions as Aristotle's rejection of pangenesis, Newton's rejection of Cartesian Vortex Theory, or Einstein's insistence that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics is incomplete. Pursuit of a modest descriptive philosophy of science may require a certain amount of detective work, particularly for episodes in which the pronouncements of scientists and their actual practice do not coincide.
o What we call things and where we draw the line between one class of things and another depends upon the interests we have and the purpose of the classification.
NASA told me that this planet is very cold. People may say that Pluto is colder than Antarctica. It is a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt. NASA told me that there was an 11 year old girl whose name was Vinita Burney. I learned from the space facts cite, that this planet was found around.. 3,10,1930. It also says is the largest dwarf planet but the 2nd massive, I do not understand that fact because if it was the largest how couldn’t it weigh the most. Pluto is -229 degrees Celsius but it is -380.2 ferinhight. WOWW THAT’S COLD!!!! pluto was discovered by a man by the name of Clyde Tombaugh. It is 33.3333 percent of water. I think it’s a cool fact that Pluto got its name by an 11 year old girl. Pluto weighs 13,050,000,000,000 billon kilograms.
The question of how and where to draw boundaries around science remains controversial issue till today. Since emergence of modern science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, many philosophers and thinkers tried to set up clear boundaries or criteria that separated it from other forms of knowledge. However, no consensus on the given issue has emerged up to now. This issue is known as a “demarcation problem” in philosophy and it has always been of the utmost importance to the science itself, since it give a rise to many other problems concerning general status of science in the modern society. For example, if we cannot draw clear line between science and myths, how can we judge about superiority of the former against the latter?
Example: if we study a human identity - should it be defined by the number and organization of its limbs, its cells, its atoms?
Many issues have arisen from the debate whether or not Pluto is a planet. Some astronomers say that Pluto should be classified as a “minor planet” due to its size, physical characteristics, and other factors. On the other hand, some astronomers defend Pluto’s planet status, citing several key features.
John Scotus Eriugena was one of the first metaphysical philosopher of the middle ages and his philosophical intention was to understand and categorize all of reality. First, Eriugena divided nature into two classifications: “Things that are” and “Things that are not”. His inspiration came from non-other than the “platonic supposition that there is a hierarchy of being.” (Page 121) The “Things that
Throughout history the definition of planet has changed greatly. The Greeks defined a planet as an object that was a “wanderer” in the sky. This was to say that a planet was an object that changes position relative to the background stars.[3] This included the 5 planets visible to the human eye (Earth was not considered a planet) and sometimes included the Sun and Moon. The definition of planet was changed and reworked until 2006, when the current official definition was created. This definition is as follows: “A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood
...am is not by any means disregarding hundreds of years of science and tradition, but rather the complete opposite! The redefinition would simply improve the current definition, respecting the old tradition, while using it as a foundation on which to base the new advancements. The new definition would be more exact, more easily calculable, and more reliable. Most importantly, it will eliminate the physical object altogether, building the definition into nature itself and ensuring constant stability. However, we can only improve if we aren’t afraid of change. As C. Joybell said “We can't be afraid of change. You may feel very secure in the pond that you are in, but if you never venture out of it, you will never know that there is such a thing as an ocean, a sea. Holding onto something that is good for you now, may be the very reason why you don't have something better.”
Many individuals including great scholars have come up with a variety of definitions concerning the meaning