Although the environmental movement is one that involves people from all around the world sharing similar ideals, there is also a growing divide between the regular environmentalists and the extremists. Peaceful protests, boycotts and letter writing have categorized much of the environmental movement. However, starting around the 1990s certain environmental groups became disappointed and overwhelmed with frustration that nothing was being accomplished by simply following the rules. This is when civil disobedience, law breaking and monkey wrenching began to make headlines. What started out as environmentalists trying to make a point, turned into wide scale sabotage and fear. This transformed the media’s view of environmentalists from peaceful protestors to domestic terrorists and posed the question, where do we draw the line?
An environmental group that was a front-runner in the ‘eco-terrorist’ movement and in the headlines in the 1990s was the Earth Liberation Front. Although the effectiveness of the ecotage seemed to spiral downward towards the end of the group’s existence, their beginning actions of protest serve as the perfect example of how in some cases, peaceful protesting is not enough, and more extreme measures need to be taken to stop horrific injustice. In 1997, the ELF burnt down the Bureau of Land Management Wild Horse Corrals in Burns, Oregon, costing the company $474,000 in damages. Locals had peacefully protested this particular business for around ten years, and still nothing was done. When the ELF stepped in, however, the business was destroyed and unable to ever rebuild, ending the unlawful slaughtering of wild horses.
Peter Singer’s article “All Animals are Equal”, sheds light on the problematic treatment ...
... middle of paper ...
...m.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-769753-dt-content-rid-2269917_1/>.
Reilly, Patrick. "Leftists Pushing Radical ‘Christian’ Environmentalism." Human Events. 65.22 (2009): n. page. Print.
Singer, Peter. "All Animals are Equal." The Readings. Random House, 1990. Web. 3 Apr 2012.
Singer, Peter. "Animal Liberation at 30." The New York Review of Books. NYREV, Inc, 2003. Web. 3 Apr 2012.
Thoreau, Henry David. "Literature @ SunSITE." Civil Disobediance. SunSITE Manager, 2001. Web. 3 Apr 2012. .
Wenzel, George. "ANIMAL RIGHTS, THE SEAL PROTEST, AND INUIT." Animal Rights, Human Rights. University of Toronto, 1991. Web. 3 Apr 2012.
proponents for the unjust issues or laws. If the negotiations were found to be unsuccessful, King would arrange non violent direct action. Antigone on the other hand, didn’t attempt negotiations, she believed that in certain cases, civil disobedience was necessary, and would do whatever was necessary to do her part of doing what she felt was just. King viewed civil disobedience as an obligation if laws were unjust, especially if the proponents of the unjust laws were not willing to negotiate as well
Jurgen Habermas and Michael Walzer believe civil disobedience to be a vital instrument of revolution because it calls attention to injustice and facilitates systemic change. Herbert Storing rejects this principle, denouncing civil disobedience as a means to subvert institutional solutions to unjust legislation and degrade constitutional order. Habermas and Walzer dispute Storing’s condemnation of non-violent direct action, defending civil disobedience as an inherently democratic process that advances
pretension of Civil Disobedience and what can be seen as acts of indirect and direct civil disobedience. H.A. Bedau and Henry David Thoreau come to mind because of how they both saw things in a different light, but at a meaningful level they both thought the same about the government even through they expressed their ideals in completely different ways. Their ideas cross on many different paths as to which even Bedau talks about Thoreau in his essay in regards to being “responsible” for your actions. The
legal attentions than the others are neglected; ergo, some individuals aim to change that. The principles of civil disobedience, which are advocated in both “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. to the society, is present up to this time in the U.S. for that purpose. To begin with, Thoreau expresses that civil disobedience should be more implemented when the just resistance of the minority is seen legally unjust to the structure conformed
This section seeks to introduce the reader to the issue of Civil Disobedience and Electronic Civil Disobedience in general. The first section provides a brief background on the issue of Civil Disobedience in general and in the Malaysian context, and the question of anarchy that arises with it. The problems regarding Klang Valley youth participation in Civil Disobedience and Electronic Civil Disobedience will be discussed in the problem statement. Key terms and concepts used in the research will also
the differences in situations, King acknowledges that Socrates is a proponent of civil disobedience because of his unwavering commitment to truth and virtue. I believe while Socrates did go against the injustice within his society, he did not go as far as King. Ultimately, I utilize King’s form of civil disobedience as the exemplary form and when compared to the Socratic methods of Socrates, it proves that his actions did not reach the extent of King’s. However, Socrates’ differences in the methods
however, at what point does civil disobedience become an appropriate course of action for a Christian? The world in which humans live is a fallen world,
harming anyone or any type of violent action,That's what civil disobedience is. The exact definition of civil disobedience is “ a peaceful form of political protest. Civil disobedience ideals are not that radical and it has been around for many years.These are just some examples we have seen thorough the ages. “The declaration of independence”, “Non Violent resistance” (Gandhi),and “A letter from the birmingham jail”(MLK) all show many examples of civil disobedience. First the “Declaration of independence”
Henry David Thoreau wrote an essay called Civil Disobedience which little did he know would influence great leaders such as Mohandas Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and US civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia in 1929. He graduated college with honors and developed a talent for public speaking. A man by the name of Edgar D. Nixon saw King’s public-speaking gifts as great assets in the battle for black civil rights in Montgomery, where the bus system
today’s world. Ever since Thoreau’s essay, “Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau’s ideas influenced the world, for defining and using civil disobedience as it means of protest. Approximately 114 years later, one of the influenced people was Martin Luther King Jr , who wrote, “ Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, that expand and supported Thoreau’s ideas, from including direct action to American tradition of protest. Although the ideas expressed in, “Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, are
called “civil disobedience”. One of the most well known activists of civil disobedience was Martin Luther King Jr. during the American civil rights movement of the 1960s. King’s theory of a non-violent approach to injustices consisted of a process that promoted dialogue of a peaceful nature in order to gain understanding while reconciling differences. Nevertheless, when the laws made by man attempted to negate the laws of God, King urged people to use creative tension in the form of civil disobedience
From the Boston Tea Party to the Civil Rights movement, civil disobedience has played a key role in social reforms throughout United States history. Key advocates, such as Thoreau and King, supported civil disobedience as a way to disobey laws and protest injustices based on moral principles. While Thoreau advocates for individualism, King asserts that mobilization and nonviolent protests are necessary means to justify civil disobedience. Furthermore, King’s response to Malcolm X’s appeal to necessity
Civil Disobedience: An American Refusal Unlike individual refusals, political refusals like civil disobedience always involve claims of legitimacy. In her essay "Civil Disobedience," Hannah Arendt examines the legitimacy of civil disobedience, particularly that which occurs in the United States. Arendt says that "Voluntary associations are not parties; they are ad-hoc organizations that pursue short-term goals and disappear when the goal has been reached" (95). The voluntary organizations that
Civil disobedience is a form of non-violent direct action and respectful disagreement. Martin Luther King Jr. is most famous for his role in leading the African American Civil Rights Movement and using non-violent civil disobedience to promote his beliefs. He strongly believed that civil disobedience was the way to eliminate racial segregation against African Americans. While leading a protest march on the streets, King was arrested and sent to jail. In jail, he read an article written by a group
Often times Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” are studied simultaneously. The reason for this is both works explore unjust laws. Martin Luther King Jr.’s focus is on unjust laws in civil rights, while Henry David Thoreau’s focus is on unjust laws regarding slavery in the Mexican-American War. Although the works focus on two different time periods, King and Thoreau’s attitude towards laws that did not conform to moral justice resembled