There is a range of different types of leadership styles. You have Autocratic leadership where an individual makes all the decision making allow and does not consider what input others have. This type of leadership is where an individual is concerned with the task only. Then there is Democratic leadership where everyone is able to have an input in the decision making process. This is a balanced concern concerning a task but also with the employees. Laisse-Faire style is the last type of leadership where the task is not a concern, the employees are the only concern in this type of leadership.
Leadership Style
I consider myself having democratic leadership. This is a type of leadership where all the individuals take more of a participative role in the decision making process. I do not like to make decisions alone; I like when everyone is able to put their input into the decision process. I believe that the policies for the agency need to be followed at all times in order to keep everyone safe. I do not like to be pushy or act like I am better than everyone, I feel like everyone should share the responsibility to to get the job done. Over all I feel like it takes the whole time to work together as a whole in the decision process.
Problem-Solving Approach (Plan) I would sit down and write out all
…show more content…
This type of leadership requires everyone to work together as a team. Each member of the team is encouraged to set goals that are reachable with this type of leadership in the work environment. When the democrat leadership is the type used the employer is more likely to keep their employees for longer periods due to employees feeling like they are important and able to have input in decision making.
Negative Characteristic of Leadership
Visionary leadership qualities help their project teams understand the true objectives and goals, as well as, how their contributions are important to achieve these goals (Preston, Moon, Simon, & Kossi, 2015). This very statement makes the visionary leadership style my number one go to style and my most beloved way of leading. To take a vision and to be able to correctly motivate and inspire your team with each individual contribution to get a job done and to further your project to the next level is amazing to me. Visionary will be the style I strive to work toward as a future leader. My number two style would be the Democratic style, mainly because Democratic leaders bring individuals together in order for everyone to give their thoughts, ask questions, and be involved in the entire project and its processes (Preston, et al, 2015). Getting teammates involved in all aspects of the project gives them a sense of
The three major styles of leadership are Autocratic, Democratic and Laissez-faire. Autocratic leaders make decisions without consulting their team members, even if their input would be useful. Democratic leaders make the final decisions, but they include team members in the decision-making process. Laissez-faire leaders give their team members a lot of freedom in how they do their work, and how they set their deadlines. According to Peter Drucker “Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things." In order for mangers to move a team from ordinary to extraordinary means understanding and embracing the difference between management and leadership. Bottom line of this all is that no one style of leadership fits all situations, so it 's useful for managers to understand different leadership frameworks and styles. Managers must lead based on need in a way that it elevates and inspires the team. The final choice of leadership must be based on a match between the needs of the company, the level of experience of the employees and the preference and limitations of those at the
The three different leadership styles are; autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. Those that lead by the autocratic style of leadership, make their own decisions without checking with anyone. As told by Joseph (2013) autocratic leaderships styles allows the boss to have tighter control over the day to day operations of the business therefore, employees who work under them are not able to be “slackers”. Those practicing the democratic leadership style, allow others to share in the decision making process, however the leader can still override the decisions, granting him or her the final say. The democratic leadership style is designed to create buy-in from everyone. Use of the democratic leadership style allows everyone to feel that are part of the decision making process therefore, boosting the morale of the employees. The laissez-faire style of leadership allow the employees to make all of the decisions, the leader has very little involvement in the decision
To think one style of leadership is the only style seems rather pompous. You have several different types and brands of blood pressure pills to lower the blood pressure depending on the cause, therefore why would we think we only need one type of leader. At times I am needed to make a decision that I do not ask for outside participation. For example the attendance policy. I decided what would be a fair policy, how many points would be assigned for each call off and how long each point would stay active for. The situation did not need a meeting, it did not need input for others. I utilized a laisse fair style when the nurses were complaining about medication pass times. I simply gave them the task to develop a standardized medication time and let me know. When I hold a risk meeting I have several nurses and other disciplines present to assist at problem solving risk behaviors and that also means trying new techniques. Every situation is different and it is my responsibility, as the leader, to know which style would work best in each situation; sometimes it also depends on the people involved. Some staff need a leader to stand back more, others need one to effectively manage them. So not only do I have to know the situation, I also need to be sensitive to the persons involved, why it is important for me to know the staff I work
In my own experience leadership is not just about one person telling others what to do; it’s about more than just giving orders. It is about getting a group of people to work together towards a common goal with more than just the goal in mind. It is also not just about setting goals for the group but also setting personal goals for the individual, guiding and supporting them all
Each style; Authoritarian/Autocratic, Participative/Democratic, and Delegative Leadership offer time and place applications. The Democratic approach appears to be the most effective approach as the leader is an active participant. Cherry, K. (2016, October 5). Looking more into a leader as a person, Forbes examined qualities that make a great leader highlighting “honesty” as the number one quality of a leader. Additional qualities included communication, positive attitude, and ability to make hard decisions round out the list of essential qualities Prive, T.
Democratic leadership style is somewhat of a melting pot of various leadership styles and theories. One can often flow easily between leadership styles when necessary and the ability to do so more than reflects an oftentimes successfully run organization.
(Anderson 1959) The person who is using the democratic style, the person will motivate his team cooperation, can effectively and actively encourage his group members. This is on account of the person who uses the democratic style of the leadership style will decided with the team members and participate in the consultations are not unilateral democracy leader and dictator. In the study, we have found that this leadership style is one of the most effective and creates higher productivity, better contributions from group members and increased group morale. Democratic leaders can lead to better ideas and more solutions, creative problem they face, and because team members are encouraged to share their ideas, opinions, ideas, skills, problem, they need to share other things (Kendra Cherry,
They further stated that most leadership forms a new paradigm for understanding both the lower and higher order effects of leadership style. The style of leadership which is adopted by a leader is influenced by the leader’s background, personal experience, religion, political affiliation, ideology, inclination, culture and even orientation without necessarily being based on the dynamics of the situation. The major leadership constructs consist of transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and lazzirfair leadership others that are going are common are democratic and autocratic types of
Leadership style varies from person to person and situation to situation. I was expecting her to tell me one of the leadership styles that we learned about in class. I was thinking she would say authoritarian, democratic, or laissez-faire like I read about in our textbook (Marquis & Huston, 2015). The nurse leader I interviewed informed me that her leadership style is ‘servant’. She furthered explained it as, Jesus Christ, she puts others before herself. She would never make one of the employees she manages do anything she is not willing to do herself. She added that she sees herself as a role model not a manager. She believes that in order to be an effective manager she must be a role model. The way she described herself I belief she is a democratic leader. She used words like “we” instead of “I”, decision-making involves others not just herself. She did talk about the times when she has to be
Leadership styles reflect a manner and approach of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people. Traditionally, effective leadership styles were thought of a one size fits all, leaders picked one approach and used it all situations. In today’s world, successful leaders recognize the style of leadership is relative to given situation, based on analyzing the employees and the organization. Leadership styles are most effective when the actions of a leader reflect what is best for individuals and the organization, simultaneously. Leadership styles ultimately affect human behavior, and according to James G. Clawson, change occurs at three levels: Level one leadership is focused on visible behavior patterns.
Leadership styles can be divided, primarily, into the two categories of democratic and authoritarian leadership styles. This study will examine the three democratic styles of transformational, servant, and charismatic leadership. The study will both broaden the knowledge of these forms of leadership and examine their effect on performance, engagement, and job satisfaction. The research will further attempt to properly define each style, identify their goals, and effect on innovation. The styles will ultimately be compared and measured against one another to determine their merits and perils. This review will add to the discourse of democratic leadership styles and serve to establish a framework whereby charismatic, transformational, and
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
What is a leader? When thinking of this question I feel like you have to really know what it means to be a leader. Becoming the kind of leader that people would follow voluntarily; even if you had no title or position. –Brian Tracy. No one is born a leader, leaderships skills come from life experiences, education and employment. Everyone grows into a leader and then afterwards grow into a leadership style that will eventually begin to shape and inspire other leaders. Having a title or high above power does not make you a leader. Inspiring and providing great communication, confidence, advice, laughs, knowledge, honesty and reality. Those great skills help you become a great leader. Even with these great leadership skills, there are
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.