Kohlberg's Theory Of Reasoning

1127 Words3 Pages

In this paper, I will use Kohlbergs theory to explain his thought process on his three different levels of moral reasoning. I will explain how different levels of reasoning may effect how an individual makes a decision when it comes to their personal moral dilemmas, and how they justify that decision, which has no favourable outcome no matter what is decided. The three levels of Kohlbergs moral reasoning which contain two substages each are; the pre-conventional level, which includes stages one and two, the conventional level with stages three and four, as well as the post-conventional level which entails stages five and six. In this paper I will also demonstrate the different thought processes at each level and stage of Kohlbergs theory …show more content…

If a good behaviour is rewarded, it is likely to be repeated. If an unfavourable behaviour is punished, it is less likely to be repeated. Usually children and young teens tend to be at this level. Stage one of Kohlbergs theory of reasoning, is obedience to authority. If Heinz were in this first stage he may take the law into consideration and decide not to steal the medicine knowing it would be illegal. He may understand that if he steals the medicine, he will be caught and put in jail. Because of this punishment, Heinz may decide against stealing the medicine. The second stage to the pre-conventional level, involves looking out for our own individual needs and set good behaviour for future favours. This could mean exchanging good behaviour for rewards, or in Heinz’ circumstance, he could offer to pay the remaining cost of the medicine with his …show more content…

Individuals at this level are aware that what they truly believe based on their moral compass, can go against others’ beliefs and against authority and law as well. Stage five of the post-conventional theory, involves justifying a decision based on social contracts. Heinz at stage five could justify his decision to steal by reiterating his marriage vows that he took with his wife, to always protect her until death do they part. Heinz may feel that it is his marital duty to do whatever it takes to protect his wife. Even if it means breaking a law, or risking his reputation.
At stage six of the post-conventional level of moral reasoning, individuals solely act on what they believe is the right thing to do based on their internal, personal moral compass. At this stage, consequence is not a factor. Heinz may feel that saving his wife’s life takes precedence over any consequence, so he will do whatever he has to, to ensure that she gets

Open Document