Differences in Forms of Fascism

1015 Words3 Pages

As pointed out by Umberto Eco in his essay Ur-Fascism, fascism has become a catch-all word for any form of government that features a very strong central government. In his essay, Eco lists fourteen different characteristics that are features in a fascist government. However, despite their obvious similarities there are shades of difference between them. This is due to the fact that fascism typically preaches an extreme form of nationalism, and is therefore shaped uniquely by individual states it arrives in. To illustrate this point, one needs only to look at two different forms of fascism that arose in Europe in the early Twentieth Century, Italian Fascism and Nazi Germany.

The original form of fascism was born in Italy by Benito Mussolini. Mussolini was a physically imposing man who was considered attractive. This pleasing appearance was combined with his charismatic leadership and powerful oration, and he quickly rose in power as a result.

In Italian Fascism, there was very clear emphasis on war and the reclamation of the Roman empire. Mussolini didn't hide his imperialistic ambitions. He was very media savvy and used this to get people whipped into a radical fervor in support of the state. Mussolini stated that people needed a state to survive, and that the state should focus on being strong, as opposed to promoting equality. The motto that was common espoused was "nothing without the state" to emphasis the devotion Italians were supposed to have towards the fascist regime. Furthermore the "Duce" or leader was supposed to have the unquestioning and unwavering support of all Italians. Mussolini demanded the people's faith that he was their leader of destiny and would lead Italians to the glory they had two...

... middle of paper ...

... them what they truly needed. He was his role as leader of the Aryan people, as a shepherd, guiding them beyond their weak ideas of satisfaction. he said that he alone knew what would lead the people to their ultimate happiness. This, he claimed, was the unification of the Aryans peoples, and the elimination of weak ideas of sentimentality.

Both of these regimes had a lot in common, but were clearly shaped by their own unique leaders. With Italian Fascism there was an emphasis on the state, while in Nazi Germany, blood-line and race dominated every aspect of society. Both of these regimes however were highly influential at the time and spawned several other interpretations of fascist style government, such as Francisco Franco's regime in Spain. Each while sharing common elements, such as a totalitarian government, was as unique as the nation it arose in.

Open Document