Civil Partnership Essay

931 Words2 Pages

The standard moral definition relating to a couple who have lived together for a while was treated as if they were married. This definition was entirely wrong. The only marriage known to English law is those who comply with the formalities of marriage law. ‘Marriage is legally recognised by the state between man and woman’, but today things have changed and Parliament recognised this. Civil Partnership was not legally recognised until 2005, and same-sex couple were never able to create their legal relationship. A Civil Partnership was enacted by the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and is only available to people of same sex. However, there is still the difference between marriage and civil partnership.
Firstly, the differences are at the start of the relationship. Marriage age …show more content…

The Act was a compromise between those who wanted same-sex couples to be able to marry and others who did not want to receive the same legal status of marriage. Civil Partnership was described by Lord Tebbit in 2010 as a relationship but will never be as a marriage. However, the same rights have been given to those couples of civil partnerships, but the name of the relationship is not marriage. To conclude that needs to produce the same states which said that civil partners had all the same rights as a married couple. Parliament decided not to do that and instead the Act goes through the legal provision dealing with marriage separately and declares that each applies to marriage.
Firstly, the definition which relates to marriage establishes that only a man and a woman can enter marriage as per s. 3(1) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 , where civil partnership can only exist by entering between a couple of the same sex s. 3(1) Civil Partnership Act 2004. However, civil partnership is formulated at the time when the two parties sign the register as per s2(1) Civil Partnership Act Civil Partnership Act 2004, but the marriage is

Open Document