Difference Between A Hypothetical And A Categorical Imperative? Essay

Difference Between A Hypothetical And A Categorical Imperative? Essay

Length: 1389 words (4 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Melissa Stachowiak
Good Life Take-home #2
Professor Gan
November 20, 2015

5.) What is the difference between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative?
In class when we had the conversation about chapter two of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding of Morals, we had discussed the imperatives. The imperatives are broken down into two sections, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative each having different meanings.
Hypothetical imperative is described as a “command that a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose, such as the attainment of personal happiness” (Kant). As we discussed in class if one desires ‘x’, one ought to do ‘y’. An example of this would be if you want to play lacrosse well, you ought to practice daily. Hypothetical imperative meets desire of personal maxim. A maxim is a personal rule, a principle severed as motivation. Hypothetical imperatives can be described as repetitive or an obvious occurrences that happens.
Categorical imperative is described as “command that some action is necessary in and of itself” (Kant). As we discussed in class if one ought to do ‘z’, one ought to do ‘w’. An example of this would be you ought not to kill another person. This can be broken down further by diving into the meaning, ‘ought’ means without sufficient reason and ‘kill’ can be thought of as wantly. Categorical imperative has no desire component and it is also irrational to break them. An example that was given in class for the categorical imperative is if everyone had a maxim of copy from your neighbor, then no one would start to write because they would all wait for the person next to them. There are three formulations for categorical imperative, first the principle of consistency, “always ...


... middle of paper ...


...ill, he compares unhappiness to pain and happiness to pleasure. He goes on to say that ‘pleasure’ is measured in eight different ways. They are as followed duration, intensity, fecundity, purity, propinquity, extent, probability and finally quality of pleasure. Pleasure through Mill’s eyes is the only intrinsically good thing in the universe. Intrinsically good means a good in and of itself, simply because it is and it is something viewed as consistent.
Overall, the principle of unity can be seen as the golden rule of how to live our lives equal through Mill’s eyes. We have to think of our actions as promoting happiness to others around us.
Works Cited
Kant, Immanuel. "Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals." SparkNotes. N.p., 2015. Web. 15 Nov. 2015. .
Mill, John Stuart. "Utilitarianism." On Liberty. N.p., 1863. Web. 15 Nov. 2015. .




Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Immanuel Kant 's Formulations Of The Categorical Imperative Essays

- Essay #2: Immanuel Kant’s Formulations of the Categorical Imperative In his book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant theorizes an absolute and universal guide based on the principle of reason to determine what humans morally ought to do— the categorical imperative. The categorical imperatives consists of different formulations, which simply act as different ways of defining it. Within his formulations, Kant stresses the importance of universalism, equality, and Categorical Imperatives versus Hypothetical Imperatives Before delving into the different formulations of the categorical imperative, Kant must distinguish between categorical imperatives and hypothetical impera...   [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]

Strong Essays
1213 words (3.5 pages)

Utilitarianism And Kant 's Theory Of The Categorical Imperative Essay

- Moral decision-making constitutes an important part of the everyday human life. In this paper, I will examine and contrast Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative, both, which provide people with a moral structure, and how the issue of etiquettes relates to Kantian Theory. It is important to note that both the theories have their advantages and drawbacks, thus to enable one to make a methodical decision, it is important to understand the basic principles of each. However, in this paper there will be a main focus on Kantian Categorical argument and then discussing the issue of etiquettes....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Morality]

Strong Essays
1620 words (4.6 pages)

The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals Essay

- Can suicide be justified as morally correct. This is one of the many questions Immanuel Kant answers in, “The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals”. Kant discusses many questions with arguable answers, which explains why he is one of the most controversial philosophers still today. Throughout Kant’s work, multiple ideas are considered, but the Categorical Imperative is one of the most prevalent. Though this concept is extremely dense, the Categorical Imperative is the law of freedom that grounds pure ethics of the metaphysics of ethics....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical Imperative, morality]

Strong Essays
1055 words (3 pages)

Philippa Foot's Hypothetical Imperatives Essays

- Philippa Foot's Hypothetical Imperatives Philippa Foot finds trouble with the arguments of Kant, who said that it was necessary to distinguish moral judgments from hypothetical imperatives. Although this may have become an unquestionable truth, Foot says that this is a misunderstanding. Kant defined a hypothetical imperative as an action that addresses what "should" or "ought" to be done. He believed that the necessity of performing a certain action was based on other desires. This particular action would only be important if it was beneficial for another reason....   [tags: Ethics Kant Philosophy Philosophical Essays]

Strong Essays
1264 words (3.6 pages)

Kantian Approach On Kant 's Ethics Essay

- A Kantian Approach to Case Two Over the course of this essay, I will present the reader with information on Kant’s Deontology, including, but not limited to, explaining how Immanuel Kant discerns what is morally right and morally wrong. I will then apply these criterion to case number two, and attempt to accurately portray what Kant’s Deontology dictates is the morally correct response. Following this determination, I will show the reader that although Kant’s moral reasoning will lead us to a definitive answer, we should not be so quick to accept it....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Ethics]

Strong Essays
1113 words (3.2 pages)

Essay about How The Volkswagen 's Scandal Interacts With Kantian Ethics

- The Volkswagen emissions scandal is a series of choices made by the company and the people employed by Volkswagen to install a "cheat" button to alter the amount of emissions produced only under testing situations. Ordinarily, all vehicles on the road that run off of gasoline have a set about of CO2 and other harmful emissions produced by the burning of gasoline. Violation of these rules can result in fines and recalls. Due to an increased attention on car companies to fight global warming and air pollution a number of emissions have lowered in the over the year for tighter regulation on the amount of CO2 produced....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Philosophy]

Strong Essays
909 words (2.6 pages)

Essay on The Is Good Or Good?

- The one thing in the world that is considered good without conditions is good will itself. This is due to the fact that many qualities are considered good and yet those same traits can turn malicious and harmful. For example, intelligence can be seen as a positive trait with good intentions, however if you use that intelligence for the wrong reasons, examples being the plethora of dictators in history including Stalin, Hitler etc, then that “good” quality becomes a quality with bad intentions. Good will is intrinsically good even if the results brought about are not as intended because “good will is good for how it wills” (Kant, Page 5)....   [tags: Morality, Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]

Strong Essays
1766 words (5 pages)

Categorical Imperative, A Philosophical Theory Essay

- Categorical Imperative is a philosophical theory was developed by Kant in 1785. If someone does not know what is categorical imperative means, the term imperative in my own words means that you should do something. If you put the the two terms together, categorical imperative means that an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's purpose.Basically, The Categorical Imperative is something that one should do, but not because it will benefit you in this way....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Ethics, Categorical imperative]

Strong Essays
1316 words (3.8 pages)

Morality As A System Of Hypothetical Imperatives Essay

- For many years, the philosopher Immanuel Kant has argued for the existence of categorical imperatives. He defines categorical imperatives as rules that must be followed regardless of external circumstances, and that have content that is sufficient enough in and of itself to provide an agent with reason to act in a certain way. He is certain that moral rules fall under this label, and since his death, many of his followers have fought to support this claim. However, in 1972 a woman named Phillipa Foot presented an argument against this claim in her paper entitled, “Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives.” Although she asserts in the paper that Kant is incorrect, an analysis of her...   [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]

Strong Essays
1664 words (4.8 pages)

Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

- Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”....   [tags: Philosophy Categorical Imperative Kant Essays]

Strong Essays
1532 words (4.4 pages)