This year, the UK parliament is going to decide on the whether to grant devolved powers to Dalmatia. This devolution settlement would create a Dalmatian Assembly, with limited powers to vary the rate of income tax and also to make some local decisions in the areas of education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Some states that devolution might introduce corruption, financial costs and threats to national identity. However, those problems are far from incurable. Undertaken with great care, devolution in Dalmatia will produce superior outcomes in supporting local economic development, improving democratic system and preserving national unity.
Devolution: An Opportunity for Local Economic Development
Devolution is a good way to empower localized
…show more content…
Democracy is about voters having a choice among alternative candidates whom they can trust to exercise power responsibly. This essential supply of trusted democratic leadership can develop best in responsible institutions of the local government. Dalmatia contributes 40 members in the UK Parliament. Even though this number corresponds to its population ratio, Dalmatia only takes up about 6% positions in the House of Commons. This means the representatives from Dalmatia have little voice and influence in policy making process. Whether the policy made in the centralized government will serve for the needs of Dalmatian people is uncertain. It would be an effective guarantee that important decisions in Dalmatia are made by the …show more content…
In the process of devolution, certain drawbacks—such as local elite capture, lack of executive experience of local politicians and possible financial cost—should be safeguarded. The devolution settlement in 2016 should consider possible legislative specifications and the establishment of supervisory infrastructure. With careful implementation, devolution in Dalmatia will be a promising policy that can drive economic and social development at both local and national
Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.
A democratic government has long been favoured as the most fair and representative government for a country to have. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of both minority and majority government (for example efficiency, compromise, and power) and argue that in fact neither offers a fair representation of Canadian’s due to lack of both transparency and accountability.
The ideology of parliamentary sovereignty represents a constitutional order that acknowledges the necessary power of government, while placing legal limits and conditions upon its excise due to the Rule of Law, developed by the judiciary in cases such as Pickin v British Railways Board [1974] AC 765. The Diceyan theory represents a definition of parliamentary sovereignty. A general summary recalls that,
There are a number of various ways that can be used in order to address the ever-growing problem of democratic deficit in the UK, which is based around factors such as the low participation rates and general apathy towards politics in the wider public.
This paper will prove how regionalism is a prominent feature of Canadian life, and affects the legislative institutions, especially the Senate, electoral system, and party system as well as the agendas of the political parties the most. This paper will examine the influence of regionalism on Canada’s legislative institutions and agendas of political part...
The authors describe some of the advantages of a MMP system: “Mixed electoral systems provide fairly proportional outcomes, maintain the geographic link between constituents and members, provide for greater choice, and allow the opportunity for smaller parties to represented in Parliament” (p. 11). This system works better than the current FPTP or plurality system, because it allows citizen’s a second opportunity to have a voice. This is important because it would allow our minority groups to have a greater political influence. As mentioned earlier, in the current system all votes for candidates who lost, were insignificant to the election outcome. The authors explain: “Only those votes that go to the eventual winner count towards electing a representative, which may discourage people from voting or promote disaffection with the system” (p. 3). Alternatively, the MMP system allows citizen’s a second opportunity to elect party members in order to proportionally represent the popular
A divided government is when one party controls the White House and the other controls either or both parts of Congress. This type of government has not always existed in the United States and until recently, it has become the norm in the way that our government functions. In my opinion, I would say that a divided government is a healthy form of checks and balances in the American system. There are of course some pros and cons of a divided government but just like that old saying goes, “If the opposite of pro is con, then the opposite of progress must be Congress.”
As a representative of the Algo ethnic group, I want to say that our people would like the new state to introduce a parliamentary system of governence. Parliamentarism is a system of government in which the head of government is elected by and accountable to a parliament or legislature. One could rightfully ask: What is our reasoning for desiring this? We think it is justified because in presidential systems the populace at large votes for a chief executive, who is the President, in a nation-wide election. This is revenant as the Algo comprises the minority of the population of the Republic of Jarth, which consists of only 1.1 million representatives in the whole state, compared to that of 2.9 million Randies, 3.8 million Dorfas and 2.2 million Takas living in the Republic of Jarth. One can reasonably assume that the outcome will most likely be that the cumulation of the majority’s vote will hinder the representation (in numbers) of the members of the minority in office. Subsequently, the Algo will have to live under the control of a leader from another ethnic group again, which the Algo members tremble at the thought of because we are proud of their ethnicity and do not wished to be shamed for it. On the other hand, in parliamentarism, the first step is an election of members of parliament, which are the political parties. This is imperative since it will allow the Algo to be able to choose the party we really share interests with....
This paper discusses about the recent case, Rowe v Electoral Commissioner [2010] 273 ALR 1 (hereafter Rowe), related with the notions of representative government and representative democracy. Through the discussion of the case, this paper also analyses its significance in Australia.
There are many characteristics that signify a weak state, these features are huge problems for the populations of these states. The problems that weak states face are numerous and manmade, since it is men that have created these problems, it will be men that solve them. Three strategies have been presented that can and should be implemented to strengthen weak states. These strategies are the Tough Love Strategy, the Interior Markets Strategy, and finally, the Infrastructure Rebuilding Theory. Each of these can be implemented separately yet they work best when used together. Weak states are a cancer in the world of politics, a cancer that must be eradicated as efficiently as possible.
Due to the historical differences between the countries making up the United Kingdom, devolution has been applied in different ways, although the aims and benefits have
As result of the disappointed output of governance for developing countries the success is dependent on circumstances of democratic maturity, sensitivity of patronage practice and weak state building capacity. Although the existence/availability of clear governance frameworks, structures, institutions and all stakeholders, “the provisions for obtainments of good governance perspectives are more than just theory.” .Different Stakeholders, Different Positions and this mean Different POWER.(Shyamika Jayasundara session 1:7 Governance as a structure)
In a Parliamentary system there is a power concentration instead of division of powers. The Legislature is the greatest power, the government and the executive branch is dependent on Parliament. In contrast to Presidential systems, parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies have Legislative responsibility. Legi...
Democracy, in its truest sense, does not exist. There is no political authority currently existing where every person contributes an equal amount to the decision-making process of the authority’s directives. The election of officials and representatives by the populace does not, in itself, automatically result in the most democratic and widely accepted directives being enacted. However, this does not decrease the political power of the authorities, nor does it limit their practical power over their jurisdictions.
Local government has been largely described to be circulated around affairs which are of ‘peculiarly local significance’ (McLintock 1966), which can be easily gathered from the institutions name. The most commonly known branches of local government are; city, district and regional councils. Throughout New Zealand there are eleven regional councils, twelve city councils and fifty-four district councils (Janine Hayward 2016). Local government is a connecting bridge of sorts which brings together the communities within New Zealand and central government. In this essay I will attempt to explain the key functions of local government as a whole and its benefits to a New Zealand society. I will also look deeper into the election process. I will proceed