Nationalism unites people of different classes and beliefs. It can create harmony and give people a sense of identity, but nationalism is also a tool used by dictators, it can create violent forces and divide people from different geographies. Nelson Mandela conquered apartheid, united his country and inspired the world. Mandela was willing to die for his cause. After being imprisoned for 27 years the government ultimately agreed to terminate apartheid. Soon after he was released, blacks gained the right to vote in addition Mandela was elected as president. By pursuing his own national interest it led to two different groups of people who in the past hated each other, to working together and accepting one another. Mahatma Gandhi was the leader and freedom fighter in India, Gandhi’s vision of a free India was based on a religion pluralism however was challenged by a different Muslim nationalism which demanded a separate Muslim homeland carved out of India. When the British Indian Empire was split, religious violence broke out. Gandhi took leadership in congress and began a steady escalation of demands until the Indian national congress declared the independence of India. When the British forced people to sell there crops, the people then turned to Gandhi, who was an advocate of Ubuntu, meaning that all people are good, he pursued a strategy of non violent protest and showed them a revelation and won grant from the authorities. Therefore it is evident that a nations pursuit of its own national interest can lead to internationalism. Nationalism can indeed have positive outcomes, Nelson Mandela not only conquered apartheid he lead a nation. Gandhi led India to independence as well as inspired movements for civil rights and freedom ac...
... middle of paper ...
...he country. However, in 1994, the Rwandan President's plane was shot down. The Hutu's blamed the Tutsis for this incident and mass killings broke out throughout the entire country. In total about 800,000 people were killed, 90% of them Tutsis. Some blame is put on the UN Peace Keepers because if they had been doing their job, this would not have happened.
This proves once again in both examples that a nations pursuit of its national interest led to ultra nationalism, conflict and violence.
As we perceive from history, nationalism can be a force for heroism and honor or for revenge and conquest. It can unite a nation or tear them apart. Nelson Mandela united a nation, as did Mahatma Gandhi. Adolf Hitler did the exact opposite. I believe that non violent protest was one of the best ways to peace, “You much be the change you wish to see in the world.” –Mahatma Gandhi.
Nationalism has been a potent force for change since the development of human civilization. However, opinion about the extent to which nationalism may be appropriately pursued is highly diverse, a factor that has led to immense tragedy and suffering in countless regions worldwide. While it is both appropriate and sometimes encouraged to take pride in being part of a nation, it is of the utmost importance that it is done without harming or subjugating people of another. Uniting a people by force and potentially eliminating or destroying those who may oppose it or not belong to it is unacceptable ethically, morally, and socially.
“Nationalism(n.) - loyalty or devotion to a nation, especially an attitude, feeling, or belief characterize by a sense of national consciousness” (The War of 1812 and the Rise of Nationalism 1). Nationalism was a crucial part of America’s success during the War of 1812; nationalism was reflected in the post-war period through increased national pride, emphasis on national issues, increase in power and scope of the national government, and a growing sense of American identity (The War of 1812 and the Rise of Nationalism 1). The first to arise which was the driving force behind American victories against the British was nationalism. This nationalism was expressed in four ways; patriotism, political, economical and cultural. American patriotism
Germany. Nationalism is a complex concept that can be viewed as both a unifying and a disunifying force, depending on one's perspective and background knowledge. On one hand, it can bring people together who share a common bond based on a single "nationality" or ancestry. Those who view nationalism as a unifying force often reject loyalty to a monarch, instead choosing to remain loyal to their fellow citizens. On the other hand, some people see nationalism as a disunifying force because it can disrupt efforts to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
The Hutu and the Tutsi have been in conflict with each other for years but after what happened in 1994 I don’t think that anyone will ever forget. In that year Rwandas Presidents plan was shot down and he was killed. In the days following is when the genocide started, because the Hutu believed that it was the Tutsi that shot down the plan and killed the President because he was a Hutu. The United Nations let this go because of the killing of ten of their own and because of their rules of engagement that resulted from the ten Belgian members being killed while trying to protect the Prime Minister. During a short time period of only a few months about 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu moderates were killed by the militia, other groups and even neighbors.
Throughout the years, humans have constructed many unique civilizations; all which follow a distinct social, economic, and political structure. Even so, there is one characteristic that prevails among these societies, the concept of nationalism. In short, nationalism refers to the feelings people have when identifying with their nation. This simple notion possesses the ability to divide or unite collective groups, and has played an important role in many historical events.
Nationalism is an umbrella term, thus it has many different sides to it. Purely nationalists are people who support and honor their nation; they don’t start wars. Internationalists are often making sure it is in the national focus to support other nations this is how they support peace and cooperation among nations. It makes them prosperous. Ultranationalists are often frantically loyal to other nations and hostile towards others. This causes the breeding ground for racism and superiority to other nations it is ultranationalists that start wars and genocides. The source tries to explain how ultranationalists start wars but mistakes them for nationalists, which is why can only partially accept the source stated.
Nationalism, the spirit or aspirations common to the whole of a nation, an importing factor to many countries due to its importance; The people of their nation and their “ality” makes up the country they choose to be and grow in. Citizens showed their nationalism through national anthems and written passages as Russia has done, which contains the saying that they will never be conquered or overthrown (document five). However, due to the utmost prominence of their patriotism reaching out to other countries, it helped cause the First World War, World War I.
There are two countries that flourish due to Nationalism, Germany and Italy. The creation of Germany was possible through nationalism. Nationalism brought German community to unify and create a nation. On the other hand, the rivalry of the great powers to control other territories grew more as countries were wanting to influence past their borders. “The great powers had come into conflict over spheres of influence in China and over territories in Africa, and the Eastern Question, created by the decline of the Ottoman Empire, had produced several disturbing controversies.”(“World War I” 2015) Militarism was another aspect of these ideologies where countries would increase military spending to get new weapons and increase the military size. This gave people the idea that war was the only solution to their problems and also intensified nationalism because it increased their confidence in the military, thinking their country could win any battle against any foe. “Imperialist and nationalist, resulted in a hardening of alliance systems in the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente and in a general armaments race.(“World War I”
Nationalism is a way of thinking both politically and socially to create a community united by history, ethnicity, religions, common culture, and language. Numerous effects occurred while establishing a Nationalist community, some effects were a long term impact on Nationalism, and other were short term impacts on Nationalism. Bloody Sunday was a big impact of Nationalism, what started out as a peaceful march of Petersburg workers marching to the Winter Palace led by Father Gapon turned out to be a nightmare. The marchers wanted to establish an eight hour work day, establish minimum wage, and assemble a constitution, while the marchers marched they were fired upon by Russian troops and several hundred marchers were killed.
Nationalism at its core is the support of a country. The goal of a country is to have some sort of resonance within the individuals that reside there that call themselves citizens. If the citizens don’t feel any connection with their country, they may move to find one that they feel closer too. Once found, they may support the country over others, defend it within conversations of politics or just find groups that have the same ideals they do about the country. This papers purpose is to illustrate the pros of nationalism as well as its cons.
Although some have said that "nationalism is measles of humankind", in my opinion, it is not. Nationalism has led to the growth of identities, and innovations. These reasons influence us in so many good ways that we should embrace nationalism to a great extent. Although at the same time I believe that we shouldn't embrace it to the extent of where we hurt others.
The question then becomes, what did nationalism lead to? It quickly led to war. Once certain phrases became apparent in society, such as “foreign contrivances” and “most intolerable of human beings”, they were bound to accelerate in severity. Many years later, Adolf Hitler contrived some of his arguments and beliefs from Fichte.
...powerful forces in binding people together, nationalism is a powerful force capable of inducing people to act collectively, share burdens, and even make sacrifices for the nation’s common good. As a result, it promotes the stability of democracies.
Nationalism is what justifies nations. Without nationalism there is no need to distinguish between two neighboring countries, no need to establish political unions, no need for xenophobia. Nations are the product of small groups banding together to form one larger “imagined community.” Thus it disrupts a said community when an outsider moves in and attempts to assimilate: this is the issue with immigration. No longer does the nation share a common history. The nation is now defined by a citizenship rather than a sense of culture. Civic nationhood is associated with the United States, but can be increasingly seen seen in modern Europe. Civic duty is a more becoming a more prevalent form of nationalism; the US developed it as part of American