Rene Descartes uses logic and mathematics to convince me that the theory of Geocentrism is incorrect. In his Discourse, he expresses the perfection of math when he writes, “I found mathematics especially delightful because of the certainty and clarity of its reasoning. But I did not yet notice its true use. Thinking it was practical only in the mechanical arts, I was astonished that on its foundations, so strong and solid, nothing more imposing had been built up”(Discourse Part 1). Descartes explains that math is one of the only perfect things in the world. Math has a solid foundation, and there certainty in every question. Descartes has a huge influence in the Cartesian coordinate system, which “allows to take reference points in space in a set of numbers”. One reason why I reject Geocentrism is because of the Cartesian coordinate system. Scientists have used this to understand and plot Earth’s elliptical orbit in a mathematical sense. Descartes did not trust anyone he didn’t even trust himself. This caused him to fall in love with math and physics, because of the certainty and truth in the principles. In his Discourse, he explains, “For my notions had made me see that it is possible to reach understandings which are extremely useful for life, and that instead of the speculative philosophy which is taught in the schools, we can find a practical philosoph...
... middle of paper ...
...ot the center of the universe. Lastly Newton’s explanation of gravity changed society’s view of the physical universe forever. These three philosophers ideas came together and helped future generations understand why the theory of Geocentrism is incorrect. I reject the theory of Geocentrism because of how these three men effected the past shaping the world that I live in today. They had challenged what they knew to be true because they wanted to prove something to themselves. Without the challenges they took upon themselves we may still have questioned whether or not that the Earth is the center of the universe. However, these men with help of a few others forever changed the world. They helped guide scientists and engineers in the correct direction, and with new technology we led ourselves to understating that the Earth is in fact not the center of our universe.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the film “Blade Runner”, replicants are made perfectly like human beings through a well-done ‘skin jobs’ and genetic engineered. They can demonstrate the abilities to perform and work like human: they can talk and they can also have feelings and emotions. These replicants are stronger, faster, and smarter than humans; however, they are only genetically programmed for a designated life span of four years. Replicants are created to use as a slave labor, which is used in “off-world colonization”.... [tags: Blade Runner, movies, Descartes,]
537 words (1.5 pages)
- One of Rene Descartes’s most famous arguments, from his not only from his first meditation but all of the meditations, is his Dream Argument. Descartes believes that there is no way to be able to distinguish being in awake from being in a state of dreaming. In fact you could actually be in a dream right now. Rene Descartes’s theory that one is unable distinguish being awake from dreaming, as interesting as it is, can be at times a little farfetched, along with a few contradictions to himself, Descartes’s dream argument does not entitle himself to any sort of claim.... [tags: Descartes Theory, Dreaming, Awake]
1011 words (2.9 pages)
- Rene Descartes, often times referred to as the father of modern thought, believed that our philosophy as humans should be based solely on reason. This meaning, that if something cannot rationally be explained, then it must be false. Descartes argued that by using reason to establish philosophy, two types of existents were present, necessary and contingent, and that one must first call into question their previous beliefs in order to gain a proper philosophy. This questioning of beliefs came to be known as the methodic doubt.... [tags: Epistemology, Mind, Rationalism, René Descartes]
1242 words (3.5 pages)
- Nelson on Descartes?s Theory of Perception and Judgment ABSTRACT: One tension in Descartes?s account of human error stems from the idea that we may be faulted for our acts of will, despite the fact that God is our omnipotent and omniscient creator. In the present essay, I describe a second tension in Descartes?s account of human error. After describing the tension, I consider Alan Nelson?s characterization of the means by which Descartes?s intended to relieve it. Although Nelson's interpretation is almost correct, I think that it obscures some of the interesting details of Descartes?s theory of perception and judgment.... [tags: Descarte Philosophy]
3050 words (8.7 pages)
Review of Descartes: An Intellectual Biography and Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
- Review of Descartes: An Intellectual Biography and Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain Descartes' error, Antonio Damasio tells us, was his belief in "the abyssal separation between body and mind . . . " (250). As Damasio notes, there are certainly many specific "errors" in Descartes' writings--that heat causes the circulation of the blood, for example, or that movement is translated instantaneously through the plenum from one object to another--but all these notions have been "corrected" by subsequent theory in ways that we can imagine Descartes himself might easily accept.... [tags: Descartes ]
733 words (2.1 pages)
- Descartes first meditation included a few arguments that Descartes studied and analyze. The one I choose to analyze was his argument of sense deception. The actually argument is the following: (1) My senses sometimes deceive me. (2) If my senses sometimes deceive me, then they might always deceive me. (3) If my senses might always deceive me, then I cannot be certain about any beliefs acquired through my senses. (4) If I cannot be certain about any beliefs acquired through my senses, then I must suspend judgment on those beliefs.... [tags: Descartes]
661 words (1.9 pages)
- During the sixteen hundreds, the French philosopher René Descartes laid the foundations for the beginnings of Cartesian Dualism. In contrast, the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued against dualism in favor of materialism. Recently, Cartesian Dualism, and dualism in general has fallen out of favor as materialism arose as a more plausible and explanatory theory regarding the interrelationships between body and mind. The translation Descartes’ writing in the Meditations is far more cryptic than Hobbes’ writing in the Leviathan.... [tags: Descartes vs Hobbes]
1496 words (4.3 pages)
- Descartes states that the mind and body are two separate substances. I will argue against this claim for there are three reasons to not believe Descartes. The first reason is that we generally come to know things through our senses. Second, there is no empirical evidence to support other minds. Third, there is a close connection between the mind and the body. Descartes theory of substance dualism states that there is a difference between the mind and the body; your mental state is not affected by your physical state.... [tags: Mind, Philosophy of mind, René Descartes]
1288 words (3.7 pages)
- Descartes and the Existence of Physical Objects In his sixth meditation Descartes must return to the doubts he raised in his first one. Here he deals mainly with the mind-body problem and tries to prove whether material things exist with certainty. In this meditation he develops his dualist argument; by making a distinction between mind and body; although he also reveals that the are significantly related. He considers existence of the external world and whether its perception holds any knowledge of this world.... [tags: Descartes]
669 words (1.9 pages)
- A Humean Critique of Descartes Montreal has big potholes. Lots of them. If one is to truly understand the philosophy of Hume and Descartes, one must understand what they would do with crummy roads as civil engineers in Montreal. Hume would probably repave the roads based on the success of past designs and the results of empirical data. Descartes, on the other hand, would probably leave nothing unscathed after attacking the problem with reason, scrapping the existing roadmap and re-building roads with new foundations and new directions.... [tags: Descartes Critique Philosophy Philosopher Essays]
2570 words (7.3 pages)