Descarte continues by telling us about his procrastination period hence leaving the question whether his basic beliefs which are the foundation to many other are indeed part of a fallacy. While reading Descartes publication, I interpreted a little differently then what may have been the context. Throughout Descartes reading I reflected on our society and how we deem truth to be what we are told without questioning it and when we do decide to question it, we happen to procrastinate the critical thinking needed to answer our questions, often leaving our questions unanswered. In a sense, we are being herded like sheep in a reality that may be no true than that of Bikini Bottom in Spongebob. It has me wonder about two questions, are we truly alive? And when did we really die? The reason I ask the latter question, is because we may be under the disillusionment that we are alive because we wake up, eat, drive, and so on, though this may not be entirely true; a subjective perception nonetheless.
When Descarte discusses the topic of sleep and how in many cases our dreams are no different than what we have experienced in our defined r...
... middle of paper ...
... existence, because surely there is a difference. In my opinion, one 's reality is subjective, while existence is unquestionable if it meets a certain criteria (kind of what Descarte was mentioning). Tom 's secondary illusion by the evil monster may have been the monster 's reality since it was created by it, but lacked true existence and reality in Tom 's life.
All in all, I interpreted the text as an analogy to the lives we live today and based on the subjective nature of what we define as reality and the objective nature of what is defined as existence. The subjectivity of reality made Bouwsma 's argument not seem strong enough, he could have surely questioned the criteria Descarte sets as existence versus the subjective nature of reality. Arguing reality based on senses is one thing, but only if one is conscious of the reality or consciously creates such reality.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, he talks about the distinction between God and existence. This paper is going to argue that in Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, both are contrasting how we know that God really exists and how we know what we perceive in this world actually exists as well. This essay will start by talking all about Rene Descartes and his ideas around the existence of God and life itself with everything living in it. Rene Descartes is putting forward an argument that everything we perceive in life is true when he says; “And thus I now seem able to posit as a general rule that everything I very clearly and distinctly p... [tags: literary analysis, rene descartes]
1125 words (3.2 pages)
- In Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes does and experiment with wax to try to prove that things actually exist in this world. This essay is going to prove how we can tell that things actually exist and what can perceive the wax. Rene Descartes starts off with a description of the wax so he can prove to us the changes that will happen throughout his experiment. “Let us take, for instance, this piece of wax. It has been taken quite recently from the honeycomb; it has not yet lost all the honey flavor.... [tags: meditation on first philosophy]
1226 words (3.5 pages)
- In Descartes’ Meditations, his goal to prove the existence of things could only be accomplished if he was logical, clear, and correct in his thoughts and writings. The most important issues he noted were the threat of being deceived and the potential of being incorrect in his judgments, both of which would lead him into error. Error exists as a problem that individuals encounter on a regular basis, and it also exists as a focal point in Descartes’ Meditations. Descartes defines error as “a privation or lack of some knowledge which somehow should be in me.” As a “thinking thing”, which he defines as “a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, is willing, is unwilling, and also imagine... [tags: Rene Descartes, 2015]
996 words (2.8 pages)
- Introduction Belief whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances have split the philosopher community in two: the dualists and the monists. In this essay, I will discuss how the mind and body are not distinct based on Rene Descartes’ arguments in The Meditations Of First Philosophy. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will pick the most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning with other philosophers’ points of view.... [tags: Mind, René Descartes, Metaphysics, Ontology]
746 words (2.1 pages)
- Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works in modern philosophy. John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and countless other philosophers wrote largely in response to Descartes. Yet there are serious doubts related to the treatise's major argument. In the Objections and Replies, a collection of objections to the work along with Descartes personal and often very detailed replies to said objections, the philosopher Antoine Arnauld raises the question of whether or not Descartes was guilty of circular reasoning.... [tags: Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy,]
2010 words (5.7 pages)
- Descartes' Meditations In Descartes’ meditations, Descartes begins what Bernard Williams has called the project of ‘pure enquiry’ to discover an indubitable premise or foundation to base his knowledge on, by subjecting everything to a kind of scepticism now known as Cartesian doubt. This is known as foundationalism, where a philosopher basis all epistemological knowledge on an indubitable premise. Within meditation one Descartes subjects all of his beliefs regarding sensory data and even existence to the strongest and most hyperbolic of doubts.... [tags: Philosophy Doubt Meditations Descartes Essays]
2133 words (6.1 pages)
- In his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes states “I have a clear and distinct idea of myself, in as far as I am only a thinking and unextended thing, and as, on the other hand, I possess a distinct idea of body, in as far as it is only an extended and unthinking thing”.  The concept that the mind is an intangible, thinking entity while the body is a tangible entity not capable of thought is known as Cartesian Dualism. The purpose of this essay is to examine how Descartes tries to prove that the mind or soul is, in its essential nature, entirely distinct from the body and whether or not he is successful.... [tags: Descartes Meditation One 2014]
1172 words (3.3 pages)
- Descartes overall objective in The Meditations is to question knowledge. To explore such metaphysical issues as the existence of God and the separation of mind and body, it was important for him to distinguish what we can know as truth. He believed that reason as opposed to experience was the source for discovering what is of absolute certainty. In my explication, I will examine meditation two in order to discover why knowledge was so important to Descartes. Meditation One The first meditation acts as a foundation for all those that follow.... [tags: The Meditations Essays]
2784 words (8 pages)
- Descartes and the Existence of Physical Objects In his sixth meditation Descartes must return to the doubts he raised in his first one. Here he deals mainly with the mind-body problem and tries to prove whether material things exist with certainty. In this meditation he develops his dualist argument; by making a distinction between mind and body; although he also reveals that the are significantly related. He considers existence of the external world and whether its perception holds any knowledge of this world.... [tags: Descartes]
669 words (1.9 pages)
- The purpose of the wax argument is designed to provide a clear and distinct knowledge of “I”, which is the mind, while corporeal things, “whose images are framed by thought, and which the senses themselves imagine are much more distinctly known than this mysterious ‘I’ which does not fall within the imagination” (66). Through the wax argument, Descartes’ demonstrates that corporeal things are perceived neither through our senses nor imagination, but through our intellect alone. In this argument, you will see that there is cause to doubt Descartes’ analysis of the wax and his method of philosophical reasoning.... [tags: Descartes Meditations]
1444 words (4.1 pages)