Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of corruption in the economy
Essay on Causes of Pakistan economic challenges
Effects of corruption in the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of corruption in the economy
Pakistan’s history has been dominated by people demanding for democratic form of government. There have been several debates on which form of government is suitable for Pakistan and no one can come to a conclusion. Each democratic government has been replaced by dictators and no democratic government had completed it tenure. Of course there have been valid reasons for the removal of democratic governments by the military rulers but to this date Pakistan nation wants democracy. Although democratic government means people have more say in the government and there would be little chance of revolution and destabilization caused by it , democracy results in incompetent people forming governments, large scale corruption, instability and introduction of illegal ways of gaining power.
Democracy is the government of wealthy people which ultimately results in incompetent people gaining power. Majority of the people in Pakistan are uneducated and illiterate as the report by United Nations education department in 2012 stated that the illiteracy rate was 79%. Hence, these wealthy people bribe local tribes or their caste by providing them short term benefits and fake promises for the long run for example the pirs in the interior Sindh and Punjab. Furthermore, they have economic power to influence media and use it for their own benefit. Big business houses use daily news headlines to create public opinion in their favour. This influence of wealth over politics is probably clear in India, Pakistan and in many other countries which has led to the election of incompetent people in the government. Democratic leaders’ Yusuf raza gilani Bhutto zardari Nawaz sharif fooled people in their reign to get themselves elected by the use of their wealth and e...
... middle of paper ...
...awaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto got themselves elected by Pakistan nation informing them about their great plans before elections but they couldn’t solve Pakistan problem and created many more. If these plans would have been implemented Pakistan would have been a way better country then it is now. Hence in reality people can only elect people and they do not have any say in how their country should be run.
Works Cited
Baker, Raymond.. Capitalism's Achilles Heel: Dirty Money and How to Renew the Free-Market System, Wiley; 1 edition, Ausgust 5, 2005.
Gupta,Tusha. “What are the advantages and disadvantages of democracy”. 19th March 2014 http://www.preservearticles.com/2012051632245/what-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-democracy.html Yusuf Huma, “Pakistan’s corruption conundrum”, 24th April 2013, http://www.dawn.com/news/794012/pakistans-corruption-conundrum
When democracy itself is dominated by the logic of the market money dominates everything, even in the social life, as election and future political campaign.
Wealth and Democracy performs a splendid job of convincing one that democracy is endangered and that the practices of the rich and those in power can be deceitful. For the most part the book is easy to follow, fairly organized and has an exceptionally good index. However Phillips could have done better when making references to his previous works because they are confusing and unclear.
Fareed Zakaria’s The Rise of Illiberal Democracy expresses the views he has on the differences between liberal democracy and illiberal democracy, and which one causes civil war. He also explains how both types of democracy go hand in hand with other in the formation of the United State government and it constitution. Zakaria also talks about how majority of the countries in the world are democratic, but majority of which are an illiberal democracies. His ideals could also be reflected during the civil rights movement.
...ny critics over the years, and we have seen many arguments for and against the use of a free market system. However, I believe along with the authors that without capitalism, America could not be the country it is today. Even though American society has faced many moral issues, it is not the fault of the economic system, rather the fault of the morally inept who take advantage of the system and those participating in it. The authors also develop their argument by bringing up issues that I was not able to fit into this paper such as government intrusion in the free market system, as well as corporate injustice. However, again as I stated before, these are injustices resulting from individuals, not from the core foundation of the system. Capitalism aligns closely with the economic principles laid out in the bible, and because of that it is a morally superior system.
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
Since its independence in 1947, political stability has been a key factor which has ensured that India is the largest democracy in the world today. In spite ...
Democracy is “...the word that resonates in people’s minds and springs from their lips as they struggle for freedom and a better way of life...” (Schmitter and Karl, 1991:75). However, the word democracy has many different means depending on the country and context it is used in. “Every country has is own culture and comes by its political system through its own history” (Greenberg, 2007:101, cited in Li, 2008:4). Li, (2008) states that because of China’s political structure the usual road to democracy may be difficult for it to achieve. The western idea ...
Firstly, K. Isbester mentions that democracy has a different meaning for everyone, as some can define democracy as a good aspect for development, on the contrary other believe that it is nothing more than voting after several years. Although, Latin America see democratic g...
What is democracy? Democracy a form of government in which the people freely elect representatives to govern them in a country, democracy guarantees free and fair elections, basic personal and political rights and independent court of law. There are two types of democracy, direct and indirect democracy. Direct democracy or pure democracy is where there is direct participate of the people; people make decisions for them instead of letting them representative make decision for them. Indirect democracy the decisions are made by the representative on behalf of the people that voted for them. All over the world people are having different views with regard to democracy and how it operates. “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried” ~ Winston Churchill, some have said democracy is the worst government form of government which I also think it’s! Due to the how it operates.
Ghosh, Palash. "Pakistan’s High Illiteracy Rate Threatens Its Fragile Democracy." International Business Times[New York] 18 APRIL 2013. Web. 22 Nov. 2013. Retrieved from .
“Are political Islam and democracy compatible?” This question has been troubling both Muslims and non-Muslims living in East and West for a long time now. Contemporary Islamic political thought has become deeply influenced by attempts at reconciling Islam and democracy. Muslim thinkers who deal with political debates cannot disregard the significance of the democratic system, as it is the prevailing theme of modern western political thought. Hence, it is necessary for any alternative political system, whether it is religious or secular, to explore its position with regards to democratic government. In fact, a large literature and media publications have developed over the last century on this heated discourse of democracy versus Islam. While many argue that Islam has all the ingredients of modern state and democratic society, many other reject the phenomena “modernism” and “democracy” as a whole because of their “foreign nature”—alien to “Islamic values”. For Islamists and modernists, the motivation for such effort to either embrace or reject democracy often is to remove suspicion about the nature and goals of Islamic movements and Islamic revivalism or resurgence. But before diving into this discourse, one needs to understand the definition and origins of “democracy.” Although purely a Western ideology in its origin, there is no consensus on the definition of “democracy” as a political system. The Oxford English Dictionary describes democracy as: “A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives” (“democracy, n.”). In my paper, I will examine whether or not democracy and Sunni political Islam are compatible through the eyes of three revolutionary Sun...
Rose, John David. Rescuing capitalism from corporatism: greed and the American corporate culture. AuthorHouse, 2005.
Shawki, Ahmed, Paul D’Amato (2000), “Briefing: The Shape of World Capitalism,” International Socialist Review, [http://www.isreview.org/issues/11/world_capitalism.shtml], accessed 19 May 2012.
Democracy, in its truest sense, does not exist. There is no political authority currently existing where every person contributes an equal amount to the decision-making process of the authority’s directives. The election of officials and representatives by the populace does not, in itself, automatically result in the most democratic and widely accepted directives being enacted. However, this does not decrease the political power of the authorities, nor does it limit their practical power over their jurisdictions.
Pakistan has all the major ingredients necessary to become a developed nation; it has a geo-strategic location, a generous availability of natural resources and a large population in the working age. Despite having the potential to turn itself into a developed country, Pakistan has not been able to fulfill its potential.