Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
democracy and its purpose
“transitions to democracy and democratic consolidation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: democracy and its purpose
Democracy is a form of a regime that is associated with “rule by the people” that implies rights and liberties for citizens, such as civil liberties and political rights to partake in elections. Democratization is the process of a regime becoming more democratic through democratic transition or consolidation. Democratization is a progression that can take several generations (Meisburger 155). A democratic transition is a movement from an authoritarian rule to a democratic one, whereas consolidation is the process in which a new democratic order becomes institutionalized, and the idea of authoritarianism is rejected (Dickovick and Eastwood 121-123). For example, Tunisia has seen a democratic transition, which was created by a civil society with strong, non-violent demands for respect for human rights (Chan 2). Human rights include civil rights, such as equal access to institutions and freedom of speech, and political rights, which gives people the right to political expression and the right to vote (Dickovick and Eastwood 121). The change had begun after massive demonstrations, after a street vendor, named Mohamed …show more content…
The presidency went to Ennahda ally Moncef Marzouki, who won the most votes the next year. He took power December 23, 2011 (Stepan 90). His victory is a notable success because Tunisia was the first Arab country to have achieved a democratic transition since the Arab Spring (Akbar). It was Tunisia’s first free parliamentary election. Two years and two politicians murders later, people called for the Ennahda-led government to step down. It was the only Islamist-led government to step down willingly. Luckily, there were no groups strong enough in Tunisia to enforce its authority, including the military, which was kept weak under the previous regime (Chan
Kyi Suu San Aung. "The Quest of Democracy." Reading The World: Ideas That Matter, edited
In a democracy people are allowed to vote, speak freely and have faith in their government. This is because they live in a democratic society. However, even in the modern (Post WWII) world there are many non-democratic governments, such as dictatorships, that abuse the rights of their subjects and are corrupt. Fulgencio Batista’s dictatorship in Cuba from 1952 to 1959 is an example of the differences between democracies and dictatorships.
What do you think of when you hear the term “Democracy”? A democracy is a form of government in which the people have power to make decisions by them directly or by elected representatives. The word democracy describes a political system. In a democratic country, all eligible citizens have the right to participate, either directly or indirectly, in making the decisions that affect them. The term “Democracy has been very popular in the recent years. For me Democracy is considered the highest form of human evolution and I will explain why I hold it in such a high regard in my research paper by compare and contrasting the ancient Athenian democracy and to the modern American democracy. In my research paper I will start with a brief introduction on how democracy was established, followed by their beliefs and values, the governmental differences, how the decisions were and are being made, and end with the strengths and weakness of these two eras.
Democracy (“rule by the people” when translated) comes from the Greek language. In ancient Greece, where popular government first appeared around 500 B.C., these systems were called democracies. (Dahl, 78) Those called “democracies” in classical antiquity advocates in both theory and practice of becoming modern democracies. Since the end of Cold War era, the modern civilizations strive to create, or preserve democracy as one of the ultimate ideals. (Shah) Accordingly, a number of democracies have flowered in East Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America and enough have floundered to spark a vigorous debate about what it takes to create a lasting liberal order.(Patten, 1) Even the Middle East – the Arab World is slightly on the road to democratizing since the Arab Spring. How does democracy happen? In this essay, I would like to focus on the fundamental principles of democracy according to the Schmitter and Karl’s article “What Democracy Is … and Is Not”, and would like to examine the emergence of democracy according to the article “Economic Development and Democracy” by Seymour Martin Lipset, “Bowling Alone” by Robert Putnam and “Why Democracies Survive” by Larry Diamond.
Tunisia, a country located in the northern part of Africa, marks the birthplace of the Jasmine Revolution –a wave of demonstrations throughout the country all in support of overthrowing the current government at the time and creating a democracy. The Tunisian people saw that their economy, society and country were failing and realized that the current government system and officials were to blame. They succeeded in overthrowing the government and are currently trying to create a fair and stable democracy. A key element to democracy is rule of law. Rule of law is the legal principles that should govern a nation and is essential for a proper democracy. It protects the rights of citizens, as well as their property, from other citizens and the
Human history is pock-marked with innumerable wars and revolutions. The cause for most of the revolutions has been the choice of freedom. The opportunity to live a life without physical, mental or emotional restrictions has been and still is of supreme importance to man. This has resulted in the most widely followed discipline of political governance: Democracy.
The word Democracy has been defined a number of different ways by many people all over the country. This word has also meant different things over the years as things began to change throughout the United States. People in the past had different views on Democracy because life back then was much different than it is today. People realize that they really have a voice and a chance to fight and vote for what they believe in. The television show, “The Voice”, sees democracy as only the people who own an electronic device has the right to vote because there is not another way for people to get their vote in. On the other hand, Frederick Douglass sees democracy is only available to white men within the United States of America. Although democracy is usually defined as “a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting”, it’s sufficient to say that both “The Voice” and Frederick Douglass defined democracy a little bit differently, but still equally believe that the people are the ones who have the chance to make a difference and vote for what they think is right.
To ensure proper success of a democracy, a form of government in which the power is vested in the people, citizens must have certain excellences that contribute to the overall society. Granted equal rights and privileges regarding expression, worship, and voting, in addition to the unalienable rights of the Constitution and the equal opportunity to participate directly in governance, there are certain character traits of democratic citizens that contribute to the functioning of the government. These virtues allow citizens to reach their optimal function as democratic citizens. By possessing the virtues of law abidingness, civility, and responsibility, citizens in a democracy can reach their optimum function as willing, informed and engaged
Democracy is robust, widely accepted and highly anticipated around the world. It is the triumphant form of government; dominantly used in Europe, North and South and America and becoming reformed and taking new roots in Africa and Asia. Although the term democracy is based on its Greek origin, demos kratos, meaning people rule, the term cannot be simply understood as such. Due to vast coverage, the adaptation of democracy has varied greatly, whether regionally, nationally, by state or through different branches of government. Perhaps this can be advantageous when the different categorizations listed above can use democracy to rule and suit themselves best, but other factors, such as globalization and neoliberalism, has caused the need for
According to Keohane (2003), promoting democratic systems of governance internally and externally and high observance of personal freedom rights has been one of the main fundamental principles within the United States. As a nation that is fully committed to its ideals, the US has since time immemorial held that political ideals and principles are conceptually and universally allowed. Agreeing to support democracy in its entirety not only upholds the American values as enshrined in the constitution but also supports the country's stability, security, religious and social freedoms as well as workers' rights (Duffield, 2001). The country's internal support for democracy additionally reflects on the outside where
The transition to democracy, according to Welzel and Inglehart (2008) is affected by social and cultural factors that accompany modernization. Modernization is likely to lead to an increase in economic development, which is conducive to democratization. Improved economic conditions have been...
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
The idea of an ideal democracy is not a particularly obtainable idea, considering the different in culture and history of countries this could be a dramatic change to previous authoritarian regimes. Although we can work towards this idea of an ideal democracy reaching this goal will be a much harder task. The attributes that contribute to having an ideal democracy are free and fair elections, their capability to implement policies, political participation of the masses and universal adult suffrage, and a multiple party political system.
Implied in the common understanding of democracy is the idea that democratic regimes respect the individual rights of their citizens. According to Cingranelli and Richards (1999:513), “most findings in previous empirical human rights research indicate that the governments of democratic countries tend to have more respect for physical integrity rights than the governments of authoritarian countries”. Proponents of this argument contend that democracy reduces government oppression, because democracy empowers the masses. The masses, so empowered, use their power to prevent those in authority from abusing their human