Democracy In Action

2487 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: religion shaping political culture

In such an inspiring country as America, things are never as they seem. In 1791, when the first amendment came out the citizens at the time were thrilled to have the freedom of religion and the freedom of speech. As time went by, law enforced the separation of church and state act, which made it so no religion could directly effect the governments decisions. Gradually, leading our government away from the morals and beliefs of our founding fathers. Now, over 200 years later our government has changed and adapted so much, it's hard to believe where we came from. According to our three branches of government, the legislators make the law, the judiciaries interpret the law, and the executives enforce the law. However, what if one branch of government became corrupt? Would we as citizens be able to live with the governments decision? My objective is to explain to you who the lead judiciaries are, their standards, and their view on us as citizens.

To begin with, the supreme court is made up of nine justices. When a justice is appointed they have to win the approval of the president and congress, then they have a life term, until they retire or die. Their income comes from tax payers pockets every time we go to court. The down side being that we pay them but have no say whatsoever about the decision of who gets appointed. Today's justices are as follows: Chief Justice, John Roberts and associate justices; Samuel Alito, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas.

From the time they are appointed until the time they resign, those nine justices have complete power over the US court and judiciary branch. The theory being that if we had one bad justice then...

... middle of paper ...

...A 1st Amendment

Intersting.com, www.markquotes.com. John Adams Quotes. 2001-2004. Web. 16 March 2011.

Press, the associated, www.freedomforum.org. Ten Commandments plague ordered out of Pennsylvania Courthouse, 7 March 2002. Web. 16 March 2011.

Schneider, Ronna Greff, Education Law: 1st Amendment; Due Process and Discrimination Litigation, Thomson West, 2004. Print.

Segal, Joshua. “Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Deception.” Oxford University (2010) 15: Forum Philosophicum. Print.

Olehla, Richard. “Common Faith: Civil Religion in the US.” American Phenomena (2010). Print.

Weiseltier, Leon. “Under God and Over.” The New Republic (2004). Print.

Willing, Richard. “High court grills Pledge plaintiff.” USA Today (2004). Print.

www.aolnews.com. AOL News, Who voted in 2010 and why it matters for 2012, 4 November 2010. Web. 16 March 2011.

Show More
Related

  • The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court by Jeffrey Toobin

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... eye. While Toobin gave me great insight to the people who make up the Supreme Court, this book has become dated in some aspects. Stevens and Souter no longer are a part of the Supreme Court. As this book shows, each individual Justice makes up the personality of Supreme Court, which is now sightly different, without Justices Stevens and Souter. The nine justices in the book served together longer than any other group of Justices. Toobin describes the how each of the Justices got appointed to the Supreme court, including the failed nominations that ultimately brought each of the Justices to the Supreme court. The Supreme Court shapes our country in ways that no other branch of government can, because they are appointed for life. Ultimately, nominating a Supreme Court Justics, is one of the most far reaching and lasting way a president can shape our nation.

    Read More

  • Modern Interpretation of The First Amendment

    1663 Words  | 4 Pages

    Through the years many changes have taken place, and technologies have been discovered, yet our Constitution remains. Some say that the Constitution was written for people hundreds of years ago, and in turn is out of step with the times. Yet its principals and guidelines have held thus far. The framers would be pleases that their great planning and thought have been implemented up until this point. However this does not compensate for the fact, that the we the people have empowered the government more so than our fore fathers had intended. Citizens were entrusted with the duty to oversee the government, yet so many times they are disinterested and only seem to have an opinion when the government’s implications affect them. As time has changed so has the American people, we often interpret our freedoms in a self serving manner, disregarding the good of the whole and also the good for the future. Thus there are no true flaws in the Constitution, it appears that the conflict emerges in the individual and their self, and poses question when we must decide when to compromise the morals that our Constitution was founded on, or when to stick to what we know is right and honest.

    Read More

  • Executive Branch Checks And Balances

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to John Acton in 1887, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”, meaning that if unlimited power is given to any one person, they can be corrupted by it. The framers of the Constitution recognized this and built in a plan to prevent this from happening and a result of this, the Constitution spreads power equally between the three branches of government: The Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. These built-in checks and balances are very important to our government, because they keep one branch from gaining too much power over another. This balance of power prevents any branch of our government from being “corrupted absolutely”. This thesis will argue that this part of the Constitution is as important today as it was when first

    Read More

  • From Renaissance Law to Modern Democracy: A Historical Perspective

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt recognized the place that religion holds in democracy. “Religion, by teaching man his relationship to God, gives the individual a sense of his own dignity and teaches him to respect himself by respecting his neighbor's. Democracy, the practice of self-government, is a covenant among free men to respect the rights and liberties of their fellows. International good faith, a sister of democracy, springs from the will of civilized nations of men to respect the rights and liberties of other nations of men. In a modern civilization, all three—religion, democracy and international good faith—complement and support each other” (Franklin D. Roosevelt: State of the Union message). This statement supported the idea that religion is associated with a well functioning government. However, in the case of Everson v. Board of Education it was stated that, “The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach” (Hugo Black). This case occurred after Roosevelt’s presidency, and left a significant impact on the American government, as it made clear that religion had no place in the government (Hugo Black). In recent years, a larger disconnect between the church and the American court systems has been created with the nationwide

    Read More

  • Checks and Balances

    1169 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...09). Congress is supposed to enact laws, and the ability of judges to modify them with court decisions shows how their power may extend past what the system of checks and balances had intended. The last aspect that shows how powerful this branch may be is the judges. Originally, the lifetime appointment was supposed to relieve them of pressures when deciding cases, but this serves as a double edged sword. Judges without fear of retribution shows the amount of power that they posses. Overall, the development of judicial review, judges lifetime appointment, and ability to modify laws has led to an unbalance of power by the Judicial Branch among the three branches of government.

    Read More

  • Legislative Branch Speech Outline

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court and other various courts system at the federal, state, and local level. As I mentioned before the Supreme Court Justices are nominated the President of the United States, but the Senate must also approve them with at least 51 out of the 100 possible votes (“Branches of Government”). There is no specific term length of a Supreme Court Justice, once appointed, they will have that position for life or until they decide to retire.

    Read More

  • Georgia State Court System

    1956 Words  | 4 Pages

    Supreme Court and Court of Appeals judges are elected in nonpartisan statewide elections. Mid-term vacancices are filled by appointment. State law requires that nominees are state residents and have practiced law for a minimum of seven years.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1787 Article three of the constitution created the Supreme Court, but not until 1789 was it configured. The way it was originally set up was with one Chief Justice and five associate judges, with all six members being appointed for life. This court serves as the “supreme law of the land”, it has the power to determine if state or federal laws are in conflict with how the Court interprets the constitution.

    Read More

  • Democracy in America

    2000 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the course of history, mankind has been recorded to corrupt itself. Men have grown tired of simply surviving; they have had to take and conquer others. Absolute monarchies control wealth, land, and even lives of men. The conditions of the people were solely dependent on the conditions of the one who was in power in that particular place and time. History has proven that most men rule unwisely in their kingdoms. To avoid tyrannical rule, some make an attempt to set up a government in which the people ruled themselves. This form of government is called a democracy, or “rule of the people.” History has also revealed through the Greeks and the French Revolution, that a democracy that gives complete power to the people, “absolute democracy”, is nothing more than a short prelude to tyranny.

    Read More

  • The Quest Of Democracy Analysis

    859 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kyi Suu San Aung. "The Quest of Democracy." Reading The World: Ideas That Matter, edited

    Read More

  • Structure of American and California Governments

    9636 Words  | 20 Pages

    The United States of America is one of the most powerful nation-states in the world today. The framers of the American Constitution spent a great deal of time and effort into making sure this power wasn’t too centralized in one aspect of the government. They created three branches of government to help maintain a checks and balance system. In this paper I will discuss these three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, for both the state and federal level.

    Read More

  • Lifetime Tenure for Supreme Court Justices

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Honorable Jonathan Yates, former deputy general counsel for the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of the U. S. House of Representatives, writes, “This lifetime term now enjoyed by justices not only contravenes the spirit of the Constitution, it counters the role intended for the court as a minor player in the equal judiciary branch of government. Term limits are needed to adjust the part of the court to the intent of the founding fathers” (Np). Judge Yates explains that the greatest powers of the Supreme Court did not originate from the Constitution or Congress, but from their own rulings (Np). The most prominent of which, was being Marbury v. Madison, in which the court granted itself judicial review, or the power to determine the constitutionality of legislation (Yates). Furthermore, the intended role of the court by the founding fathers was so small, that it did not have a home, or meet to hear any cases (Yates). An amendment to the Constitution removing the lifetime tenure of U.S. Supreme Court judges needs consideration by Congress. Lifetime tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court has led to four points that could not have been foreseen by the creators of the Constitution. The first problem resulting from the Supreme Court’s tenure policy is that judges’ are holding on to their seats, disregarding debilitating health issues. The second issue that has arisen from lifetime tenure is the use of strategic retirement by sitting judges to ensure a like-minded replacement. The third development resulting from lifetime tenure is the steady decrease in case decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court. The fourth and final effect lifetime tenure has had on the Supreme Court is an increase in celebrity status of the judges, which has le...

    Read More

  • Does Democracy Work?

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    Democracy: a government by the people, in which citizens rule either directly or through elected representatives - the latter description more relevant to today’s societies. Quite evidently, democracy is not perfect; like any other political system, it is subject to a plethora of flaws. For instance, it is no secret that voters tend to make illogical decisions – not out of sheer malice, but as a result of being wrongly informed. Politicians also make erroneous choices, whether they do so because they are dishonest or simply out of touch with the true will of their constituents. Further, anyone who has studied the government of a parliamentary democracy knows gerrymandering can have a powerful say in determining elections. Despite these and other flaws however, democracy still seems to work.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Social Policy

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    nine justices hold incredible power and when they interpret the law and vote in their decisions it

    Read More

  • Democracy as the Best Form of Government

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    The foundation of the modern political system was laid in the times when the world was strangled in slavery. In those moments, enlightened minds in Greek came up with the new system that was there to remain for the next thousands of years. This system, now known as democracy, is a form of government in which supreme power is vested to the people themselves. People have the right to elect their leaders directly or indirectly through a scheme of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. A new democratic government is usually established after every 4-5 years, and it is trusted with the responsibility to cater to the needs of all the people irrespective of the fact that they voted for them or not. Although the minorities may not be very pleased with the idea of democracy, however, a democratic government is certainly the best because it establishes social equality among people, reduces the conflicts in the state to a minimum, gives the chance to vote repeatedly, and creates patriotism.

    Read More

More about Democracy In Action

Open Document