Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
impact of globalization
impact of globalization
globalization impact on us economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: impact of globalization
Nowadays, due to the advances in transportation and communication technologies, globalization generates further interdependence of both the economics and cultural activities among countries. This interaction causes mutual understanding, balance, and also conflict. Thomas Friedman, the author of “The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention”, speaks highly of globalization. He claims that it could bring peace to human beings, since countries in the same global supply chain are less likely to go to war. Andrew Marantz, on the other hand, realizes that cultural assimilation accompanied by the international collaboration creates an identity crisis in India in his essay “My Summer in an Indian Call Center”. Globalization could cause cultural cost, such as a loss …show more content…
In Marantz’s essay, he claims that “call-center employees gain their financial independence at the risk of an identity crisis” (Marantz 287). This means that in order to have better lives in a globalized world, Indian BPO agents have to give up their original culture and even identities to some extent. While Marantz focuses on the loss of original Indian culture, Friedman is concerned about the distorted cultural self-confidence in some Muslim countries. “At the same time,… this flattening process has intensified the feeling of humiliation in some quarters of the Muslim world over the fact that civilizations to which the Muslim world once felt superior – Hindus, Jews, Christians, Chinese – are now all doing better than many Muslim countries” (Friedman 176). The Muslim world once cultivated a splendid national culture in their history, but many other nations do better in today’s globalized world. Once Muslims realize they are lagging behind others, they may feel a sense of humiliation. Both authors realize that the increasing communication and interaction among cultures generate challenges to the original cultures of some countries. Globalization exposes
As Americans we have to start to comprehend that the world around us is changing technologically, politically, and economically. In “The Last Superpower” an excerpt from the book The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria published in 2008. Zakaria emphasizes on these changes. Thomas Friedman the author of “The World is Flat” a piece from the book The World is Flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century published in 2005 also emphasizes on the same changes currently happening in the world. Zakaria and Friedman define these changes as globalization. The obvious common ground shared by both authors is their representation of globalization and the effects that it has and will continue to have on modern life. In contrast to sharing the same main topic both authors take a drastically different approach on how the relay their information to the audience. The differences displayed are mainly due to their personal and educational backgrounds, definitions of globalization as well as the individual writing styles of each author.
It is one of my traditions to call my grandparents and aunts who reside in my natal country (El Salvador) every Sunday. Whenever my mother goes to the store, she prioritizes buying imported Salvadoran products to make a good, typical Salvadoran meal. I miss my country’s traditions and culture, I also miss my family and friends, however, thanks to the new technological innovations, I get the opportunity to communicate with my relatives and remind myself of where I come from. Globalization provides individuals with great general interactive opportunities, without it, many countries would have difficulties progressing and collaborating with each other. In Jared Diamond’s 1997 written work, Guns, Germs, and Steel, he attempts to answer Yali’s question
4."Globalization in Everyday Life." Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically About Global Issues. New York: Worth, 2006. 471-571. Print.
“Red is a positive color in Denmark, but represents witchcraft and death in many African countries,” (Understand and heed, 1991, p.1). Simple understandings, such as this one, can make the difference in a business’ success or failure in a foreign country. Various countries have different customs and beliefs that need to be accustomed to when business are to be successful. American businesses especially have difficulties with this concept. “At times in the past, Americans have not had a good track record of being sensitive to cultural distinctions,” (Understand and heed, 1991, p.3). Perhaps this is because America is made up of so many different cultures that American people have become so used to easily adjusting to each other’s differences that they forget that other cultures are not as flexible. Today, more American’s are becoming more sensitive to the differences of other cultures. This sensitivity and understanding has come with a price, after a long string of business failures. It is not until a business fails miserably in another country that they see the adjustments that should have been made in order for their success to be a possibility. With an understanding and sensitivity to the customs and beliefs of other cultures, it is possible for successful businesses that have originated in western cultures to also be successful in foreign countries as well.
Overtime, as shown through the shift from Fordist to Post-Fordist ideals for production, it takes long period of time to mix people and nations closer together. This is being done through technological innovation, as technology is helping to dissolve former barriers of time and distance. Factories that used to dominate the United States have now spread throughout the world, providing jobs for people globally. Consumers are also on an international level, as there is a greater awareness and understanding of what is happening everywhere. Globalization, however, also produces economic and social disorders while producing public concerns over job security, the distribution of economic gains, and the impact of instability on people. Many people also worry about a growing focus of economic power, harm to the environment, danger to public health and safety, the breakup of native cultures, and the loss of power and responsibility within government. I believe that as a global citizen, I have to look at all perspectives from people in different situations and realization how current times have come to be. I am a part of an entire world community and all my actions, although in a miniscule amount, contribute to building the world’s community values and practices. By living in the United States and attending UW Madison, I
The paradoxical dichotomy of globalization and cultural diversity are, on one hand, globalization provides third world cultures, and nations in conflict, the potential to become empowered through interaction with stronger, more stable cultures. One the other hand, it can also lead to the disempowerment of people in weaker nations by stronger nations with negative influences and motives of colonization that will deprive the native cultures of their identity. There are positive and negative aspects of globalization, however, it is the driving force for innovation, cultural interaction and the prospect of building stronger cultural
In the past few decades of history, the span of globalization and mixing of world cultures has been particularly prevalent. Through the spread of technology and communications across national boundaries, the various superpowers of the world have begun immersing themselves into foreign cultures and have introduced their own cultures to nations that are not their own as well as have accepted certain parts of foreign culture in their own homes. One of the greatest examples of this exchange of culture is the prevalence of Chinese culture in the West through the establishment of various “Chinatowns” throughout popular cities in Europe and the Americas. Globalization itself, which is described as the “objective trend of economic development in the world today, featured by free flow and optimized allocation of capital, technology, information and service in the global context” by H.E. Ambassador Zha Peixin, has been a constant flow in the worlds history and permeates world cultures daily through the innovation of new technologies and spread of communications between different nations.
Friedman brings a perspective through the lens of globalization, technology, sociology, and foreign relations. While analysis Florida’s (2005) piece, it is clear his perspective is rooted in a western lens, sociology, and urban theory. Florida (2005) certainly concedes the point that the globalization has made the world more competitive. But Florida (2005) challenges Friedman (2005) on exactly how much.
The topic of globalization often hashes out polarizing views from different individuals alike. To its opponents globalization has led to corruption, manipulation and greed. To its advocates globalization represents opportunity, economic progress and higher standards of living. Jagdish Bhagwati is a fervent believer that free trade benefits all nations, while realizing that sensible policies are necessary in order to reduce the possibility of such downsides from occurring (Bhagwati P. 32). Bhagwati explains to the reader however that there is an anti-globalization movement. Whose antipathy towards globalization is misplaced due to many, particularly the youth, who believe it cannot solve the world’s injustices and who cannot intellectually cope
Stiglitz, Joseph E. Making Globalization Work. New York: Norton & Company, Inc., 2007. Kindle ebook file.
Ahmed, Akbar S. Journey into Islam: the Crisis of Globalization. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2007. Print.
...o we can achieve our dreams in life: “we are now living in a world where time and space don’t matter anymore” just like J.Mittleman said. Globalization as we just learned is relative, whether it’s an opportunity or an exploitation depends on where you sit and how you look at the world. Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. - The dark side of globalization (2008/March24). David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62)
In the light of omnipresent globalization, which aims to increase interconnectedness and abolish the geographical and cultural borders, the demarcation between values, traditions and cultural identities has been severely distorted too, urging countries and communities to preserve what has left, thus, unintentionally, alienating from each other in order to be able to deliver the relics to the next generations (Green, Preston, & Sabates, 2003, p. 453). Thus, this constant division and segregation among the society aggravates the social cohesion within the populations, resulting in poverty, inequality, and conflicts (Camilleri, & Camilleri, 2015, p. 3; Green et al., 2003). So that nowadays, as Phillipson, Bernard, Phillips, and Ogg pointed out,
Globalization is an overwhelming trend. It is no doubt that there are many positives rise out of globalization, but equally some serious negatives brought from this trend, such as gradual disappearance of ethnic identity (Buckley, 1998). This essay is going to address some positive effects of globalization generally, and then it will focus on impacts of this trend on developing countries.
Larsson, Thomas. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization. Cato Institute, 2001.