Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Objectives of the millennium development goal
What are the objectives of millenium development goals
Objectives of the millennium development goal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Objectives of the millennium development goal
At the dawn of the 21st century, when new independent states with a poor developed economies appeared on the world map in addition to the existed one, the UN decided to develop a strategy for the provision of more intensive aid to developing countries and, thus, to eliminate extreme poverty in these countries. The strategy consisted of 8 development goals which were framed as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and gave an impulse to global action. However, fifteen years later, in 2015, it was decided to expand the MDGs and add some other goals, on which the global development community will work over the next fifteen years. After long and intense discussions, all parties came to an agreement on seventeen development goals that are known …show more content…
These goals were adopted in 2000 and lasted for 15 years, until 2015. According to the reports provided by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), MDGs’ agenda was very successful and significant positive changes have been made . However, MDGs have been criticized for being focused only on eight target areas and avoiding working on the others that required the same level of attention and contribution. This was the main dissatisfaction of some of donors’ state and international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) which claimed that many important areas, such as human rights, reproductive health, etc. were ignored . Another claim is that MDGs were mainly focused on developing countries, although initially they were intended to involve all countries despite the level of prosperity. However, the real situation was far from the one declared from the UN tribune. As Liz Ford mentions in her article in The Guardian, “…while the MDGs apply, in theory, to all countries, in reality they were considered targets for poor countries to achieve, …show more content…
Sustainable development does not mean to use donors’ funds only; it is an investment from both sides. Whenever the government feels a lack of resources, donors can provide a budget support, which by default will cause a direct impact on development activities. Otherwise, considering the level of corruption in the governments of many developing counties, the public funds will be used in improper way. Financial transparency and accountability should be from both sides. It is not only important how many funds come to the country, but also where these funds go and which results are
The United States Agency of International Development (USAID) has published five strategic goals. Under these goals the USAID has formulated a total of thirteen objectives to give the strategy a more specific direction. In these
Against this bleak landscape, it is unsurprising that realising sustainable development continues to date to be a key priority in policy making processes these cases. In Africa, like elsewhere across the global south for instance, economic drivers of development have shaped constitutional reform processes as policy makers ...
...aid is inefficient and prodigal as most foreign aid program fund are paid into the irresponsible government, the mismanagement of fund and embezzlement makes the aid program become wasteful (BBC). However, this objection is not convincing because nothing is perfect, the politicians are kept on working hard to make aid program become more efficient as there are regular reports have been produced on whether the foreign aid program are carried out effectively, and, therefore imposes pressure on those government decision makers. (BBC)
The United Nations Agenda 2030 is emerging as the slam dunk, in yo face blueprint for global government. Noble and lofty goals provide much mind boggling substantiated dialogue. Attempting to rid the world of poverty, and other noble feats by redistributing the wealth of the developed nations and their wage earners - which in turn, turns out to be not so noble of a feat. The U.N. is attempting to create a world where human habitats are safe, resilient and sustainable, as well as making cities safe! They actually believe they can do this in New Orleans, Chicago, St. Louis. Detroit, etc. within 15 years? This is where my mind was boggled. Unless all of the citizens (of the world) are implanted with auto-taze microchip implants (or some kind of implant/device that has the capability to turn the bad behavior into good), I don 't see this goal happening. Perhaps maybe a police officer installed in every household/dwelling in the world will make these cities safe. If the United Nations can go
World Development Report 2013. Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World. Trnasforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. A copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press. New York, NY 2013.
“Health problems, issues, and concerns that transcend national boundaries, may be influenced by circumstances or experiences in other countries, and are best addressed by cooperative actions and solutions”(Skolnik p.7) is best defined as global health by the Institute of Medicine. With its primary focus on low and middle-income countries, challenges of international public health continue to change and grow depending on the interest of the membership. In order to participate in cooperative actions and have successful solutions, one must understand the progress made so far, the challenges that remain, and what must be done to address them most effectively. With the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), issues concerning global health were interconnected to the poverty of developed and developing countries, along with several reasoning links. After addressing the challenges of women’s and children’s health, water and development, communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems and workforces, recommendations for what should be focused on in the next decade are suggested.
“The Goal” is a book written by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox in 1984. The book is very famous in the management field. In 2004, the author published the third revision of it and celebrated selling over than three million copied of it around the world. Also, the goal book is taught in over than 120 collages. The book was recommended by my professor to be read and summarize as an extra credit.
Poor countries have been receiving aid from the international community for over a century now. While such aid is supposed to be considered an act of kindness from the donor nations or international bodies, it has led to over dependence among the developing countries. They have adopted the habit of estimating and including international aid in their national budgets to reduce their balance of trade deficits. It is believed that foreign aid is necessary for poor nations in order to break the cycle of poverty that ties their citizens in low productivity zones and so their economy will not be weak. However, some critics view the extension of aid to poor countries as means of keeping the nations in economic slumber so that they can wake up from only by devising ways of furthering self-sustainability. Because of these two schools of thought concerning the topic, debate has arisen on which side is more rational and factual than the other. The non-sustainable nature of international aid, however, leaves the question of what may happen in the event that foreign aid is unavailable for the poor nations. After thorough consideration on the effects of the assistance to poor countries, it is sufficient to state that giving international aid to the poor nations is more disadvantageous than beneficial to the nations. This point is argued through an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of giving international aid to the poor countries with appropriate examples drawn from various regions of the world to prove the stance.
United Nations. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report. New York:United Nations Development Programme, 2013. Print.
“…increasing international trade and financial flows since the Second World War have fostered sustained economic growth over the long term in the world’s high-income states. Some with idle incomes have prospered as well, but low-income economies generally have not made significant gains. The growing world economy has not produced balanced, healthy economic growth in the poorer states. Instead, the cycle of underdevelopment more aptly describes their plight. In the context of weak economies, the negative effects of international trade and foreign investments have been devastating. Issues of trade and currency values preoccupy the economic policies of states with low-income economies even more than those with high incomes because the downturns are far more debilitating.1”
Agenda 21 concentrates on the urgent problems of today and also aspires to prepare the world for the challenges of the next century. It reflects a global agreement and political commitment at the highest level on development and environment teamwork. Its successful completion is first and foremost the responsibility of Governments. National strategies, plans, policies and processes are essential in accomplishing this. International cooperation should support and supplement such national efforts. In this context, the United Nations system has a key role to play. Other international, regional and sub regional organizations are also called upon to contribute to this effort. The broadest public participation and the active involvement of the non-governmental organizations and other groups should also be encouraged.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines development as the act or process of growing or causing something to grow larger or more advanced. We live in a world that is continuously developing, in ways that we cannot even begin to try to describe. Nonetheless, The World Bank measures indicators of development. To do this, they look at three-hundred and thirty-one different indicators which cover a vast number of areas, including agriculture, aid effectiveness, climate change, economic policy, education, energy and mining, environment, the financial sector, poverty, science and technology, social development, and urban development. The World Bank’s World Development Indicators data is has been used for over fifty years as the standard by which development is measured. While this list may seem like a comprehensive, all-inclusive list, it does not consider the idea of sustainable development. While development for the sake of advancement may seem like a good option for an undeveloped country, it can be argued that development that is not sustainable is not development at all, but merely the illusion of one.
four adults in ten who can read and write and less than one in four
A person needs to achieve certain goals in one's life before you can call them successful. Success is to achieve goals, you have set. I have set certain goals I would like to achieve in my lifetime. Some of these goals are personal while others are professional. My professional goals in life are to find a good job that makes me happy, get a good education, find a job that makes enough money for me to support my family, and help people. Goals it is very important for me to receive a good education. Most job fields require a descent education. If I don't have an education I would not be able to function properly at the work place and I would not understand what to do. To maintain a good job that will make good money will require me to go thorough schooling or training and maybe even both. Education is the first and foremost way to become successful, because the job I will choose will need me go to school and maybe even beyond college. My happiness in what I do is also a goal for me I my life. There is no way someone can become successful if they are not happy with what they are doing. ...
Some of the goals are doing well, such as primary schooling. However the “reducing hunger by half” goal is not. The chart shows that two regions of the world, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia, have high hunger with only fair progress. The rest of the regions they included have moderate hunger with very little progress. This proves that the methods used to accomplish the MDGs were ineffective and insufficient (in text citation- progress chart). The fact that the Sustainable Development Goal pertaining to hunger includes food security, nutrition, and agriculture is an achievement in itself because “it acknowledges the crucial role played by food-based approaches to nutrition” (in text citation- Goal 2). Improvements in agriculture can ultimately lead to ending hunger because people will have access to more nutritious foods and farmers will be able to produce more food. The UN said the purpose of the Millennium Development Goals was “to shape a broad vision to fight poverty and combat numerous issues hampering development progress” (in text citation- chart). This claim is contradicting because the only goal regarding hunger was to reduce it by half. Perhaps one of the reasons this goal wasn’t fully accomplished was because the UN didn’t incorporate other components such as nutrition and agriculture into the Millennium