Declaration of Independence's Focus on Abuse Rather Than Ideology

1011 Words3 Pages

The American Declaration of Independence, penned mostly by Thomas Jefferson in 1776, is a beloved document and symbol of freedom in the hearts and minds of Americans. The iconic, tripartite “slogan” of this document is the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” And while this is for many the most memorable phrase in the document, the actual content focuses much more on the abuses and injuries of King George III than on these inalienable rights. In fact, Jefferson lists twenty seven specific abuses of King George III compared to the three listed inalienable rights. The question then arises, why does Jefferson parse his argument for independence in such a way? This essay seeks to show that Jefferson chose to focus on the abuse rather than ideology because of his own personal beliefs about eugenics and to engage his actual audience (the American people more than George III). Also included is a discussion of the Criticism of the Declaration of Independence (hereafter just Criticism) and its attempts at undermining the Declaration.

Thomas Jefferson, while an educated statement and eloquent writer, was also a typical white slave owner. He typically kept 200 slaves on his lands both at his Monticello home and on his Albemarle plantation. Unlike some enlightened thinkers of his time, Jefferson did not manumit his slaves for the sake of his ideals. He freed only a few, and all were in the family of his lover, Sally Hemings. Being a prolific and good writer, Jefferson’s views on many subjects are well documented to this day. In a letter to John Adams, Jefferson makes known his view on heredity: “For experience proves, that the moral and physical qualities of man, whether good or evil, are transmissible in a certain de...

... middle of paper ...

... man because of his beliefs about eugenics and the audience for his work. The small space given to a discussion of inalienable rights could be completely excised from the document and more cause than needed would remain to justify America’s rebellion from her colonial ruler and thus any argument focusing on this portion is not valid. An analogous invalid argument would be contesting the price of a purchase by saying the phone number listed on the receipt was incorrect and thus the entire purchase should be free. The phone number could be left off entirely and the price, and thus the debt of the purchaser, remains. The phone number is included for an alternate purpose, namely to give the purchaser a way to contact the merchant. In the same way, the statements on the rights of man are included to inspire the audience rather than fully justify the war against England.

Open Document