Difference Between The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

1047 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The difference between anti federalist and federalist

Prior to the Declaration of Independence the colonist were under British rule. The colonists were at major disagreements with the way the crown was treating them and after a while they had enough. On July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain with Declaration of Independence adopted by the Continental Congress. Once the declaration was made, the colonists faced many new challenges. It was now up to the framers of the Constitution to come up with regulations for the new government. This proved to be no easy challenge between the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists. Anti- Federalists and Federalists After the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the founding fathers began setting up state and …show more content…

It is the first ten amendments made to the Constitution. The rights that were added to ensure that the Constitution would be ratified can never be changed or taken away. This was a goal of the Anti- Federalists. The main objective was to ensure equality amongst the government and the people. Akhil Amar states that, “As with the original first amendment, the original second dealt centrally with an issue of governmental structure rather than substantive individual rights” (Amar, 1998, Pg. 18). The Bill of Rights emphasized on the rights of the citizens within governmental structure. The purpose was to ensure that the people had a voice and rights within the …show more content…

An amendment to the Constitution is a change that can add to the Constitution or change an older part of it. Amendments are different from those included in the Bill of Rights because they were not ratified with the Constitution. Amendments are a way to update and change what is already established with the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The amendments made, after the Bill of Rights, were added as times changed and changes were required to the Constitution. For example amendments have been made prohibiting slavery, women 's suffrage, and voting rights. Unlike the Bill of Rights, amendments made to the Constitution can be

Show More
Related

  • The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists

    664 Words  | 2 Pages

    who thought that the constitution would not be able to protect the rights of the people.

    Read More

  • Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

    348 Words  | 1 Pages

    From 1787-1790 the development of the American Constitution was a battle between two opposing political philosophies. America’s best political minds gathered in Philadelphia and other cities in the Northeast in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had both some political thoughts that agreed as well as some political thoughts that disagreed. However, both parties would compromise and ultimately come together.

    Read More

  • Federalist vs. Democratic-Republicans

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many differences between the Democratic-Republic party and the Federalist Party. Especially in the last decade of the 18th century which is late 1700’s, early 1800’s. They have different views on foreign relations and their beliefs on the war between France and Britain, their Federal government and vision for America. Their leaders are completely different people.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    On September 28, 1787 Confederation Congress sent out the draft of the Constitution. This was the first time in history for the people to debate, discuss, and decide with a vote for how they wanted to be governed. There were two groups that debated the thought of the Constitution. They were called Federalists and anti-Federalists.

    Read More

  • Dbq The Beliefs Of The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    576 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists and Anti-federalists shared the common beliefs of John Locke’s Enlightenment ideals such as all men were born equal (even though most of these men owned slaves), but their opinions about the role of government were different. Both parties had their own visions of how a new government would function and how the Constitution would support the government being proposed. Many argued that the Articles of Confederation had created a very weak government with very limited power. Specifically, the amount of power or the absence of power of a central government was the main disagreement between the Federalists and Anti-federalists. As a result, the Federalists and Anti-federalists argued about the ratification of a new constitution, which would give the central government more power.

    Read More

  • The Similarities and Differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers played a major role in US History. They dealt with many problems in politics. The papers were made after the Revolutionary war. People started to worry that the government would not last under the Articles of Confederation. Without having a backup plan just yet, some delegates met up and created the Constitution. The constitution had to be ratified before it became the rule of all the land. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers discuss whether the constitution should be approved or not. Some things Anti-Federalist and Federalists argued was a strong national government, a standing army, and whether or not the constitution should be ratified and why.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Anti-Federalist And Anti Federalists

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the Dawn of time, man was had many beliefs from the belief of gods or a god, democracy and communism. In the beginning days of our nation (United States of America) the bill of rights was being created due to American Revolution and the weakness of the articles of the confederation. The articles of confederation were the constitution at the time for the United States of America before and after the American Revolution, which we fought against the tyranny of the British government. The American government at the time realized the Articles of Confederation was weak and need to be changed. This resulted in the bill rights being drafted and added into the US Constitution. But before the bill rights

    Read More

  • Comparison Between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution

    981 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...otection of rights specifically enumerated in the constitution. The Tenth and final amendment gave powers of states and the people.

    Read More

  • The Declaration of Independence

    405 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are many important factors in the Declaration of Independence, which enable the foundation of a new government. These range from describing grievances with England, to how government should be run differently, to the first statement of separation. The first step to the foundation of a new government is the uniting of a people in a common goal. Since all people were feeling violated by English soldiers, it was necessary to state these grievances in order to make people aware that they are not alone. When people learned that others felt the same as them emotion was stirred. The Declaration of Independence listed the grievances such as, “He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” The next important step to the foundation of a new government was to gain peoples ambition by showing how the government would be run if a new party took over. This goal was achieved by stating the rights of man. “We hold these truths to be self evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This statement made people hopeful and feel kindly toward this new government. The final step in the preparation for a new government was separation from the old government. This was declared twice in the Declaration of Independence. In the beginning, “That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, driving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and in the end, “that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved. In conclusion, the Declaration of Independence was able to motivate people, give them ambition, and made it simple for Americans to take action.

    Read More

  • The United States Constitution: The Future Of The US Constitution

    1305 Words  | 3 Pages

    This later became a huge issue for the government. (Celebrate the Constitution) At the end of the Constitutional Convention a delegate from Virginia, George Mason, discussed the addition of a bill of rights, but the other delegates opposed this. (Munson) The Anti-Federalists debated that the powers of the new national government would endanger the powers of the solo states and the liberties of the people. (Celebrate the Constitution)However, the Federalists said that adding a bill of rights to the Constitution would be unneeded. A Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, said the federal government would only use the certain assigned and limited powers, and that it would not threaten the basic liberties of the people. Then on June 8, 1789 James Madison discussed adding nine amendments to the Constitution that allowed certain rights to the people. On December 15, 1791 the Bill of Rights was added to the constitution. The first eight amendments of the Bill of Rights establishes specific rights and liberties. The Ninth Amendment says that the American people have rights that are not even in the Bill of Rights or constitution. The Bill of Rights shaped what being American

    Read More

  • Anti-Federalist vs Federalist

    2017 Words  | 5 Pages

    After winning the Revolutionary War and sovereign control of their home country from the British, Americans now had to deal with a new authoritative issue: who was to rule at home? In the wake of this massive authoritative usurpation, there were two primary views of how the new American government should function. Whereas part of the nation believed that a strong, central government would be the most beneficial for the preservation of the Union, others saw a Confederation of sovereign state governments as an option more supportive of the liberties American’s fought so hard for in the Revolution. Those in favor of a central government, the Federalists, thought this form of government was necessary to ensure national stability, unity and influence concerning foreign perception. Contrastingly, Anti-Federalists saw this stronger form of government as potentially oppressive and eerily similar to the authority’s tendencies of the British government they had just fought to remove. However, through the final ratification of the Constitution, new laws favoring state’s rights and the election at the turn of the century, one can say that the Anti-Federalist view of America prevails despite making some concessions in an effort to preserve the Union.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Amendments

    1221 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Constitution is made up of twenty-five different Amendments. In this paper I will be talking about the first Ten Amendments of the Constitution. The Constitutional Amendments are made to protect the people from both the government and the law. The Constitutional Amendments explains the rights the people have that can’t be taken from the government.

    Read More

  • Gun Control - We All Have a Right to Bear Arms

    1428 Words  | 3 Pages

    The bill of rights is the set of amendments to the constitution intended to secure these objectives for the individual citizens of the United States. The second amendment states:

    Read More

  • Constitutional Amendments

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Laws made in US constitution can be rewritten if the law is not helping the welfare of the society. “Bill of rights”, aggregated name given to all the amendments that has been made to the constitution of US. A total of 10 amendments has been made to the US constitution for public welfare and for preserving democracy. Initially the Bill of Rights was only applicable to federal government but later state government also became part of it. Almost 27 amendments were proposed were proposed but after discussion 10 were given a green signal to be added as constitutional right (Kozak, 2011).

    Read More

  • Importance Of Corrections To The Constitution

    316 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Constitution is comprised of three sections the introduction, the articles, and the changes, which have been added to the Constitution throughout the years. The initial ten corrections to the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights, which give us our rights as residents. Alteration number one expresses that we as nationals of the United States of America have the privilege to free exercise of religion, the right to speak freely, flexibility of press, and the privilege to gently amass a request of to a law. Individuals trust this is the most critical alteration since it gives us our opportunities to a specific degree as nationals of this nation.

    Read More

More about Difference Between The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

Open Document