Debt relief is not likely to reduce poverty. This is largely owing to there being various other causes of poverty in the poorest nations which debt relief would not resolve. Also, relief would not make much difference as it is possible that corrupt leaders and poor governments in general would not use the money available sensibly. However, debt relief would still have a positive impact, in cases of good governance it helps countries to spend more on and improve vital services such as healthcare and education. This, in turn, will contribute to the achievement of the Millennium Development goals. Debt relief would also help break the debt cycle which has prevented economic growth in the poorest nations.
In 1996, a deal was agreed by the World Bank and the IMF. Under this deal, which became known as the HIPC initiative, 40 of the world’s poorest nations would have the opportunity to become eligible for debt relief. The HIPC initiative emphasised that the deal was aimed exclusively at the highly indebted poor countries, with the majority coming from sub-Saharan Africa. The banks were, in part, inspired by the non-governmental organisation Jubilee 2000 that campaigned for the rich donor nations to wipe off third world debt by the year 2000. In 2005 the international community reviewed the progress of development programmes and it was high on many international agendas, notably the G8 summit, the UN summit in New York and the meeting of the world trade organisation. The outcome was to accelerate the HIPC initiative and offer full debt cancellation, however, in many cases, this has yet to materialise. However, some countries such as Mali are already benefitting from debt relief.
The main reason that debt relief would not reduce pover...
... middle of paper ...
...also help countries to start working towards the millennium development goals as money is freed up to, for example, improve healthcare, improve maternal health, reduce poverty and ensure environmental development, all of which would reduce poverty.
Overall, the main reason that debt relief would not significantly reduce poverty is that it does not help to solve the other problems that poor countries face such as conflict and being landlocked. Also, debt relief will be ineffective whilst poor and corrupt governments are still in place. However, if debt relief were combined with other measures to tackle the other problems, then it would help to reduce poverty as it breaks the cycle of debt which prevents growth and also allows spending on crucial services such as education needed to achieve long term sustainable growth, as well as the Millennium development goals.
Poverty is not just an issue reserved for third world countries. Instead, poverty is a multifaceted issue that even the most developed nations must battle
Everyone knows what the word poverty means. It means poor, unable to buy the necessities to survive in today's world. We do not realize how easy it is for a person to fall into poverty: A lost job, a sudden illness, a death in the family or the endless cycle of being born into poverty and not knowing how to overcome it. There are so many children in poverty and a family's structure can effect the outcome. Most of the people who are at the poverty level need some type of help to overcome the obstacles. There are mane issues that deal with poverty and many things that can be done to stop it.
Most people of the society still blame the poor for their own predicament. They believe that "if there is a will there is a way". However, they do not think about their government that might had made bad decisions and policies that could actually harm successful development. This causes of poverty and inequality are usually less discussed and often neglected. We must recognize the effects poverty could have on the society and seek ways to create better understanding and resolve the issue before it is too late.
United Nations Development Programme. Poverty Reduction and UNDP. New York: United Nations Development Programme, Jan. 2013. PDF.
Poverty is a phenomenon that affects more than 1 billion people worldwide (Roser, 2015). It does not discriminate based upon one 's age, sex, ethnicity or the color of one 's skin. According to the United State 's census website 15.6% of people live in poverty in the United States alone. This could be due to addiction problems, health issues, natural disasters, job shortage (or loss), and various other unfortunate events. With such outstanding statistics one is left to ponder what we can do about it. Is government assistance a solution or a problem?
Weiss, M.A. (2009) ‘The Global Financial Crisis: The Role of the International Monetary Fund’, CRS Report for Congress.
the effect that the work of the IMF and the World Bank have had on the
There are many causes of poverty, starting with corruption. Corruption is a deceptive conduct by those in power who try to keep those who are in poverty trapped within their situations. When people think of corruption, they think of politics and rich leaders. Leaders from wealthy countries tell those who are already in poverty about loans and aid that they can offer. The less fortunate, not very aware of what they put themselves in are building a deeper hole with debt. The leaders from those wealthy countries are making more money also by taxing the less fortunate and receiving the money that they loaned to them. Those who are already poor try hard to provide for their families with the money they make from their jobs. Many of them lack education so it is hard to have well-paying jobs. “Poverty is the state for the majority of the world’s people and nations. Why is this? Is it enough to blame poor people for their own predicament?” (“Causes of Poverty” 5) Therefore, corruption is one cause of poverty.
The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were created as a result of the Bretton Woods Conference. Both provide assistance to countries suffering economically. While the IMF is a cooperative institution that aims to create an organized global system of payments and receipts, the World Bank is an institution that aims to help developing countries (Driscoll 1). Both play a part in the economies of struggling nations with the goal of reducing their burden and helping them to survive in the global economic system. Unfortunately, in many cases their practices within developing nations have been seen to create more harm than good. This is possibly because both institutions use a one size fits all approach when aiding countries rather than gaining a deep understanding of each country they are involved in and catering their approach as a result. In this paper I will examine the practices of the IMF and World Bank in developing nations that have led to failure and the effects the policies had on these countries.
Poverty can be described as many things, it can be described as hunger, lack of shelter, not having access to school, not knowing how to read and much more. Despite the definitions, one thing we know for sure is that poverty is a complex societal issue. Poverty is a large cause of social tensions and threatens to separated a nation because of the issue of inequalities, more specifically, income inequality. Poverty is a main impact of globalization, it can affect a whole nation by furthering inequalities. Overall, has affected all of developing countries and has a crucial impact on developed countries.
This nation has a problem: more of its citizens rely on the federal government for help than to support themselves with a full time job. Poverty has many negative effects on the people who suffer from it and on the economy. Everyone needs to be made aware of poverty and the many negative effects it has on people. There are things that could be done to help reduce the amount of people that are in poverty. Reducing poverty would decrease health risks, strengthen the middle class, and help the democracy.
The first and arguably most common effect of poverty on society is its financial impact (Veritta, 2008). In many of the societies that experienced significantly high levels of poverty, debt was increasingly common, and especially debt accrued from moneylenders (Hatcher, 2016). For many individuals living in poverty, access to financial services such as banking is often stifled and rudimentary, making it difficult for such individuals to access self-improvement loans at standard and fair rates (Yoshikawa, Aber, & Beardslee, 2012). For these individuals, moneylenders are the best option available, which results in them paying exorbitant interest rates. The interconnection between poverty and finance, however, is cyclic in nature. The lack of finances or access to financial services causes poverty, which in turn causes an isolation of individuals from finances and financial services (Hickey & du Toit, 2013). This makes poverty a fairly complex problem to
...is good because the countries in poverty gets to have money but the idea has issues because the this plan does not make the poor country rich, it only makes them depend on the rich countries. Withal, Roy proposed her own solution to poverty which is microfinancing. She calls the plan limited but yet effective. These plans proposed by Heffernan, Roy, and Esterly have the same problem because they both view poverty as a colossal problem that can be solved by getting help within the neoliberal capitalist system. This neoliberal system will only backfire in their faces by making the poor countries poorer.
Poverty is an issue which the world faces everyday. It is a constant struggle that cannot be ignored anymore. As you can see defeating poverty would take great efforts and contributions from all. We must better educate the youth and have education available for everyone all over the world. We also need to ensure that everyone has a job and that they are properly skilled for the job. People need to realize that poverty affects everyone, not only the poor and uneducated. Our world would be a much better place if everyone pitched in to help defeat a major problem around the world, poverty.
Through individual, national, and global aid, we can take steps to decrease the overwhelming amount of poverty in less-developed countries and even in our own lands.