There are countless students and other citizens around the world who obviously want to live life to the fullest. So as a young student at UA, I want to be able to do my part in protecting and preserving our environment and also the world. This topic captured my attention because I view a nuclear war as a problem that will inevitably destroy life as we know it. There are multiple opinions on whether a nuclear war is a large enough problem where people should avoid it at all cost or simply build shelters for a potential nuclear war. My stance on this situation is the government should avoid a nuclear war without fail and possibly even ban nuclear weapons altogether. A nuclear war would obviously be catastrophic to the world, but there are multiple opposing views on how people should protect themselves from this event.
I have found three viewpoints on the matter with one I agree with. The first viewpoint is that people cannot survive a nuclear war. In response to this opinion, I believe the government should ban nuclear weapons. The sources that refer to this view are “Nuclear War: A Greater Threat than Ebola” and “How to Dismantle An Atomic Bomb: Toward An Achievable Ban on the Testing of Nuclear Weapons”.
The second viewpoint is people can actually survive a nuclear war. In order for humanity to survive, citizens should build/seek nuclear shelters. The sources that agree with this view are “Defense Against Fire Effects of Atomic Bombs” and “Bomb Shelters & Fear of Nuclear War”.
The last viewpoint, I could find believes even though a nuclear war could destroy all life, governments should keep the weapons for protection. This unique viewpoint is backed up by one source that I could find named “Avoiding Nuclear War: Hearing befor...
... middle of paper ...
... helps solidify the opinion that we need nuclear weapons are if we are worried about life forms that are not from Earth invading us. I do agree that a nuclear war cannot be fought and also cannot be won which was written by the source “Avoiding Nuclear War”. If there was a nuclear war I believe that society would be in grave danger. From the millions of people who would die instantly from the explosion of nuclear bombs, several hundred million people will die from problems with the climate and from being cutoff of their food supply source. I believe that after the food supply is cutoff, the worst side of people will show and even more citizens will be murdered. Due to the catastrophic effects of the climate, humans will eventually become non-existent. Hopefully any potential nuclear war will be avoided and that all nuclear weapons will be banned before all is lost.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- There are many students and other citizens around the world who obviously want to live life to the fullest. So as a young student at UA, I want to be able to do my part in protecting and preserving our environment and also the world. This topic captured my attention because I view a nuclear war as a problem that will inevitably destroy life as we know it. There are multiple opinions on whether a nuclear war is a large enough problem where people should avoid it at all cost or simply build shelters for a potential nuclear war.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1873 words (5.4 pages)
- The debate over if humans can survive a nuclear war or not is an interesting topic. The article, “Let’s Be Clear. There is No Surviving a Nuclear War,” is written by James E. Doyle and Ira Helfand. The article was posted on Newsweek.com on August 20, 2015. This article was written to challenge the debate that people can survive a nuclear war. The authors are hoping that the audience will carry out action to prevent nuclear wars all together. An unfamiliar audience, or an audience who is mildly opposed to their views, are the type of audience that Doyle and Helfand are writing this article for.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1023 words (2.9 pages)
- The debate that nuclear weapons kept the peace through mutually assured destruction is still quite controversial. Though some historians do not believe this. Eric Hobsbawm states this, “both sides thus found themselves committed to an insane arms race to mutual destruction.” The interpretations A, B, C, D both agree and disagree with this point and each historian has their on views and there own views. Interpretation A and D disagreed with the question however also had a different view and since it was more revisionist blamed America.... [tags: Cold War, Nuclear weapon, World War II]
1828 words (5.2 pages)
- Analyzing the Argumentative Article “Let’s Be Clear, There is No Surviving a Nuclear War” The debate over if humans can survive a nuclear war or not is an interesting topic. The article, “Let’s Be Clear. There is No Surviving a Nuclear War,” is written by James E. Doyle and Ira Helfand. The article was posted on Newsweek.com on August 20, 2015. This article was written to challenge the argument that people can survive a nuclear war. The authors are hoping that the audience will carry out action to prevent nuclear wars all together.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1024 words (2.9 pages)
- The Threat of Nuclear Wars: An Annotated Bibliography Helfand, Ira, Antti Junkari, and Ogebe Onazi. “Nuclear War: A Greater Threat than Ebola.” World Medical Journal. Vol. 61. Issue 1. Apr. 2015 Web. 2 Oct. 2015. This journal explains the dangers of a nuclear war. The authors write about the threat of nuclear weapons. The writers began by stating that the medical community cannot support all of civilization if a nuclear war begins. There are over 17,000 nuclear weapons in the world. Even with the high amount of nuclear weapons, that are even stronger than the bombs that were dropped onto Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the nuclear threat is mainly ignored (Helfand, Antti, & Ogebe 14).... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1420 words (4.1 pages)
- It’s been over 14 years since the terrorist attacks of September 2001. As the world settles into its long war on terrorism, the recent Iran nuclear deal has brought nuclear disarmament and proliferation back into the forefront of public debate. What steps have been taken to address the many security challenges posed by nuclear weapons. More importantly, are the steps taken enough. When we think about nuclear security, the first thought that comes to mind is preventing nuclear war, preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
705 words (2 pages)
- Nuclear Energy Nuclear energy is energy stored in bonds holding protons and neutrons together in an atoms nucleus, when that bond is split an enormous amount of energy is released—nuclear fission, according to Nuclear Energy’s site. Nuclear energy has been a global energy alternative source for nearly half a century. Its predecessor, nuclear power, was developed for military use in World War II and became the biggest fear during the Cold War. After the Cold War, international use of nuclear weapons was banned, and an initiative to reform nuclear power into a positive model for energy.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Plutonium]
1441 words (4.1 pages)
- Though nuclear weapons cause a lot of problems like cost to make and secure them, the amount of civilian casualties they cause, and the long term effects to people’s health and countries’ economies. There are benefits to these weapons, the question is do these benefits outweigh the negatives. Ever since nuclear weapons have gained media attention they have been subject to debate, and some of the most well-known supporters of nuclear weapons have been Presidents Truman, Reagan, and Kennedy and researcher Kenneth Waltz who presented an argument supporting the spread nuclear weapons in his monograph “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons” written in 1981.... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1480 words (4.2 pages)
- This week’s readings focused on the growing nuclear threat, which increased tensions and fears during the Cold War, and the dissent that was infiltrating societies throughout the world. The United States and the Soviet Union were forced into accepting a stalemate, which became the Cold War. The alternative to a stalemate was mutual annihilation due to the amount of nuclear power both sides had begun to amass (Suri 2003). The testing of nuclear bombs confirmed Eisenhower’s fears of having a nuclear conflict.... [tags: Cold War, World War II, Soviet Union]
1384 words (4 pages)
- The countries of North Korea and the U.S. have been under constant tension since the cease fire of the Korean War. Recently North Korea has raised tensions this last year as they have been trying to expand they nuclear weapons program. The conflict was set off between the US and North Korea when North Korea conducted it’s fourth nuclear test this January followed by launching a Satellite missile in February. This has upset the US because they have not been following nuclear sanctions passed within the last few years.... [tags: North Korea, Korean War, World War II, Cold War]
1755 words (5 pages)