In addition to the main claim, the authors’ include a claim of policy. The claim of policy is used to answer the question of what actions the readers should perform in the present and in the future. Doyle and Helfand apply different proofs and tones to help the audience understand and agree that people will not survive a nuclear war. For example, the readers can sense a clear emotional tone used by the two authors in the beginning of the article. The authors exploit emotion to explain the certainty of mass destruction across the human race. Doyle and Helfand demonstrate logic to explain the effects of a nuclear war and motivation proofs to induce a reaction out of their audience so that they will be able to start agreeing with them. The usage of emotion, logic, and motivation proofs works to explain each writers’ point. The purpose of this article is to exploit the idea that all nuclear weapons should be outlawed and destroyed.
In sequence with stating their main claim, the authors begin the article by dis...
... middle of paper ...
...ould be steps taken to ban nuclear bombs.
Overall, this article is strong enough to swing readers who were on the opposing side to their side. The writers’ indicate plenty of sources to back up their claims that it is truly impossible for humanity to survive a nuclear war. The authors refer to their opponent’s views, but quickly takes advantage of these views to strengthen their own idea. A general audience would only need to research how powerful a nuclear bomb is to be able to understand how devastating a nuclear war can become. After the audience realizes these dangers, it would be fair to assume that the readers would decide to agree with the authors of this article and begin to express a need to outlaw nuclear weapons. The main claim that the destructive nature of a nuclear war would destroy humanity is backed up with reliable sources and logical reasoning’s.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- There are many students and other citizens around the world who obviously want to live life to the fullest. So as a young student at UA, I want to be able to do my part in protecting and preserving our environment and also the world. This topic captured my attention because I view a nuclear war as a problem that will inevitably destroy life as we know it. There are multiple opinions on whether a nuclear war is a large enough problem where people should avoid it at all cost or simply build shelters for a potential nuclear war.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1873 words (5.4 pages)
- There are countless students and other citizens around the world who obviously want to live life to the fullest. So as a young student at UA, I want to be able to do my part in protecting and preserving our environment and also the world. This topic captured my attention because I view a nuclear war as a problem that will inevitably destroy life as we know it. There are multiple opinions on whether a nuclear war is a large enough problem where people should avoid it at all cost or simply build shelters for a potential nuclear war.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1856 words (5.3 pages)
- Analyzing the Argumentative Article “Let’s Be Clear, There is No Surviving a Nuclear War” The debate over if humans can survive a nuclear war or not is an interesting topic. The article, “Let’s Be Clear. There is No Surviving a Nuclear War,” is written by James E. Doyle and Ira Helfand. The article was posted on Newsweek.com on August 20, 2015. This article was written to challenge the argument that people can survive a nuclear war. The authors are hoping that the audience will carry out action to prevent nuclear wars all together.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1024 words (2.9 pages)
- The Threat of Nuclear Wars: An Annotated Bibliography Helfand, Ira, Antti Junkari, and Ogebe Onazi. “Nuclear War: A Greater Threat than Ebola.” World Medical Journal. Vol. 61. Issue 1. Apr. 2015 Web. 2 Oct. 2015. This journal explains the dangers of a nuclear war. The authors write about the threat of nuclear weapons. The writers began by stating that the medical community cannot support all of civilization if a nuclear war begins. There are over 17,000 nuclear weapons in the world. Even with the high amount of nuclear weapons, that are even stronger than the bombs that were dropped onto Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the nuclear threat is mainly ignored (Helfand, Antti, & Ogebe 14).... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1420 words (4.1 pages)
- As Thomas Jefferson once stated, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government”. Have political leaders thrown aside this advice in their pursuit of nuclear arms proliferation. Since 1945, many world leaders have established forms of defense known as nuclear weapons that have the technology and capability to completely annihilate designated regions of the earth. Originally a plan for defense, the creation of nuclear arms has primarily turned into a show of military strength and superiority with little regard towards the preservation of innocent lives, as seen in Japan during World War 2.... [tags: political leaders, nuclear arms, government]
1613 words (4.6 pages)
- Cold War The cold war was on of the strangest wars that there ever was. Cold War is a kind of verbal war, which is fought through newspapers, magazines, radio and other propaganda methods. There was not any planes flying, tanks, or ground troops. However there were a stockpile of nuclear weapons, money being spent, propaganda, and there were two superpower enemies but no actually fighting occurred. The United States had been flying U2 spy planes over the Soviet Union for some time to see if the Soviets were aiming missiles at America and to snap photos of local newspaper headlines .... [tags: World War II, Soviet Union, Cold War, Russia]
732 words (2.1 pages)
- The debate that nuclear weapons kept the peace through mutually assured destruction is still quite controversial. Though some historians do not believe this. Eric Hobsbawm states this, “both sides thus found themselves committed to an insane arms race to mutual destruction.” The interpretations A, B, C, D both agree and disagree with this point and each historian has their on views and there own views. Interpretation A and D disagreed with the question however also had a different view and since it was more revisionist blamed America.... [tags: Cold War, Nuclear weapon, World War II]
1828 words (5.2 pages)
- One of the most vigorous debates focuses on the current status of the United States hegemony and whether or not it is in decline. This begs the question, if the United States is indeed declining in status, will it still be an influential player or not. I argue that the United States is losing its prominent position as the hegemonic leader of the world, but will still remain an influential player in global politics in the following decades to come. Its decline is an imminent result of their domestic issues, the violation of international laws and economic deficit, which have posed a grave and serious challenge for the United States.... [tags: Global Status, Debate]
2143 words (6.1 pages)
- In a world where most of the powerful nations seem to be prepared, why not prepare for the worst. As the French foreign minister Bernard Kouchner said “We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war’’ ("Alarm At Warning Of War With Iran."). One of the many ways to be prepared and protected against harm is the possession of nuclear weapons. Even though nuclear weapons possession might lead to nuclear war, nations should be able to possess nuclear weapons because conflicts would be averted, nations have the right to defend themselves, and nuclear powers would be overthrown.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1103 words (3.2 pages)
- Ever since the invention of the nuclear bomb, there has been tension and what countries can have nuclear weapons and concern about the hazards of nuclear proliferation. Countries have had inner conflicts trying to decide whether they should build a larger arsenal or start one by virtue of their concern of how it will affect their nation and their safety. If they build an arsenal of weapons, they will be feared; nonetheless, they must decide if that would lead to positive results or negative consequences.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1346 words (3.8 pages)