When a President appoints or nominates a supreme court candidate, it is typical for both the President and candidate to share the same ideals and principals. This creates a secure perspective for the justice to have when reviewing cases. President George W. Bush declared that his nominee, Harriet E. Miers, was “not going to change, that 20 years form now she’ll be the same person with the same philosophy that she is today.” (Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Jeffrey A. Segal., pg. 1) Presidents hope that their influence of the shared beliefs value will be represented on the court until their nominee whishes to retire. As mentioned in an essay written by Segal, Epstein, Martin and Quinn “Ideological Drift among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When and How Important?” they have analyzed how the stances of supreme court justices have shifted throughout the years ever since 1937. “Contrary to the received wisdom virtually all justices serving since 1937 has grown more lib...
... middle of paper ...
...ng “Once a conservative/liberal always a conservative/ liberal” (Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Jeffrey A. Segal., pg.1) is not applicable at all. We now see that there is no concrete proof that justices will not shift their stances on court cases throughout the years.
In conclusion, we have seen solid evidence that there is no continuous stance on Supreme Court Justices stances on court cases. We see that their opinions maybe affected due to exposure and new philosophical ideals that they did not have prior to the job. The Supreme Court does in fact shift their opinions throughout the years. This is especially important at the moment since Scalia’s absence. The future nominee that president Obama may have could in fact shift throughout their years when serving on the court. This will surely fluctuate how many cases are voted on in the future.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Term Limits for Supreme Court Justices Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states, “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme court… The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour…” Using the “Originalist Theory” (Scalia), one could argue that when the Founders developed the Constitution in 1786, they could not have anticipated that the average Supreme Court justice would stay in office for approximately 26 years.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1667 words (4.8 pages)
- Introduction and Overview On June 26, 2015, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is a fundamental right in the decision on Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al. This controversial decision overturned the law of more than 17 states. In the 5-4 decision, Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan voted with the majority and Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito were dissenting. At the heart of the controversy is the philosophy of judicial restraint and judicial activism.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1818 words (5.2 pages)
- (1) On May 17th, 1954, the Supreme Court made a decision that would mark a defining moment in the history of the United States. This decision declared “separate but equal” unconstitutional. It was ultimately unanimous, and occurred after a long, sought out campaign to convince all nine justices to overturn the “separate but equal” doctrine that had been sanctioned in the infamous 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case. The legal path paved in various aspects of racial discrimination in public life has been the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.... [tags: supreme court, separate but equal]
975 words (2.8 pages)
- “The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court is a book written by Jeffrey Toobin. Jeffrey Toobin is a staff writer for the New Yorker, as well as, a CNN senior legal analyst. “The Nine” starts in the Reagan and ends in 2007. Toobin discusses all the major cases that the Supreme Court made a ruling on during that time period. He also talks about each of the Justices, their personalities and how they came to make the decisions they did. One of the things that I found most interesting about the book was that Toobin described how the Justices became Justices.... [tags: inner workings of the Supreme Court]
1205 words (3.4 pages)
- ... “Perhaps some are confused because they have sterotypes of how blacks should be and I respectfully decline, as I did in my youth, to sacrifice who I am for who they think I should be,” exclaimed by Thomas after a discussion of his conservative view points. One of the top most controversial cases Thomas was an Associate Justice for was Miller v. Alabama, which occurred from March 20, 2012 to June 25, 2012. The Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders.... [tags: supreme, court, judiciary, chief]
747 words (2.1 pages)
- According to Taranto, on the article Disorder in the Court, he builds a profound interest in the U.S Supreme Court which has on no occasion had a keen interest on the opinion of the oft-debated question of whether the oral arguments should be televised or videotaped. A vague aversion to the idea could have been acknowledgeable except it could have been impossible to articulate a clear argument to support it. The case that was being handled at the time was a minor case which could not have made it to the news headlines.... [tags: us supreme court, court tv, court disorder]
1304 words (3.7 pages)
- When Chief Justice John Roberts emerges from behind the red curtains of the Supreme Court bench, all eyes are usually upon him and his eight other colleagues. January 21st of last year was no different. Just four months from that date, the court heard oral arguments in a case called Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. At issue: whether corporations could spend freely in political issue ads in the name of free speech. The decision was a game changer. Provisions of the celebrated Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) and nearly a half century of laws were struck down.... [tags: law]
1355 words (3.9 pages)
- This issue of abortion first came into the public consciousness in 1973 when the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Roe versus Wade. Norma L. McCorvey (Roe), was a single pregnant woman that disapproved of the current abortion law in Texas. She brought a lawsuit challenging the state of Texas abortion laws. The Texas laws made it illegal to obtain an abortion except on medical advice to save the life of the mother. Dr. Hallford, a doctor who faced criminal charges for violating laws, joined Roe on the issue.... [tags: Abortion, Roe v. Wade, Pregnancy, Abortion law]
1534 words (4.4 pages)
- The Supreme Court The Supreme Court has had many different places where it was located over the years. There has been a struggle to find a permanent home for the most powerful court of law. At first, the meetings were in the Merchant Exchange Building in New York City. The court then followed the nation's capitol to Philadelphia in 1790. In 1800 the court again relocated to Washington DC. At first they spent their time meeting in various places. The place to find the Supreme Court now is in Washington DC, on First Street located in Northeast.... [tags: Papers]
799 words (2.3 pages)
- Assisted Suicide and the Supreme Court After the nation's highest court declared that U.S. citizens are not constitutionally guaranteed the right to a physician-assisted suicide, the movement has sort of lost its steam. Why do the Supreme Court Justices consider legalization dangerous. How did it win legislative approval in Oregon in the first place. What is the current trend in public opinion about this question. This essay will delve into these questions. After the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a crushing blow to the assisted suicide movement, time stopped for the activists.... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
1524 words (4.4 pages)