A scientist by the name of Dr. Collin’s made a breakthrough in science by creating the human genome which consists of the entire DNA in our species, the heredity code of life (National). Such a breakthrough for a scientist that is a strong believer in God would call for an occasion of worship. He made it known that the belief in God is completely a rational choice and faith is paired with the fundamentals of science (National). But the real question is should faith and science be separated? Many scientists believe it should be separated simply because they don’t believe in God and they have theories that prove just that. Jennifer Sexton and Laura Finley, from an Ebsco host article made an excellent point and stated, “Religious believers argue that the presumption of God's existence is based on reason, and that the proof of God's existence is in the unanswered questions about the universe, which remain unaddressed by science” (Sexton).
As Christians our world views should strongly relat...
... middle of paper ...
... to my understanding that the reason why most scientists have turned atheistic and secular is because they are not strong believers in God to begin with. The powerful observations made in the science world are indeed believable but as Christians we underlie God’s power that exhibits the results we see. Secular scientists don’t believe that God has that much power and that is why this great controversy continues today and will continue throughout our life. However as a High school biology teacher I will be forced to keep my faith and beliefs to myself and teach what I am required to. I will never lose my faith in God and will think of ways to strategically teach the students to where they make a decision based on what they believe and not just what I say. Again, it is our duties as Christians to believe in God and his power that through him all things are possible.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Faith and Science In today’s world there is an ongoing debate between faith and science. The extraordinary advances of science have sometimes led to the belief that it is capable of answering by itself all of man's questions and resolving all his problems. Some have concluded that by now there is no longer any need for God. It has been said that one must choose between faith and science: either one embraces one or believes in the other. People seem to have faith belief in God as creator of life and some have scientific beliefs in the spontaneous generation of life from inanimate matter (Wright 111).... [tags: Philosophy, God]
964 words (2.8 pages)
- ... The basis of science is believed to have been observation and on experiences that man has lived centuries observing the natural phenomenons, experiencing of varied types. Yet religion is considered and believed to be older than science. Was it that God created man or is it that he was obliged to let him being created by man. A more profound belief is to think and concider how humankind gave birth to art, writing and religion. The fact that God differed in form and name in different languages and dialects, with different customs and beliefs all over the world among all religions, among all races and countries, with mediums of sacred text and books which shared pieces of knowledge from p... [tags: big bang theory, god theories]
866 words (2.5 pages)
- Human evolution and the dramatic social change accompanying progress and transformation demands a uniform discipline which assesses human interaction and the social world issues that pervade society. Hence it was in the context of extraordinary societal change, the Enlightenment period, that the development of a human science or ‘social science’ emerged, defined as the ‘attempt to explain social phenomena within the limits of available evidence” (Lewins, 1992, p.5).The concept of a social science can be further understood from a philosophical stand point where the work of social scientists can be classified in terms of a positivist or non-positivist position.... [tags: Social Science]
1426 words (4.1 pages)
- Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist and the University of Oxford’s Professor for Public Understanding of Science once said, “Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.” Professor Dawkins is an avid evangelist of reason and logic, and condemns any faith-based worldviews, seeing faith and reason as complete opposites. The conflict between the two is and everlasting debate, pondered by many great philosophers since the time of Aristotle and Plato.... [tags: c. s. lewis, religion, science]
1094 words (3.1 pages)
- Getting a shot can be a scary experience for children and their parents. Vaccinations protect children from dangerous infections by introducing a weak or dead pathogen triggering the body to defend itself. Sometimes these pathogens can harm the child which makes some parents wonder if the risk is worth the reward. Two opposing articles on immunization will be analyzed to determine which argument is more successful. The first article is “Immunization Is a Question of Science, Not Faith: How I Evaluated the Immunization ‘Debate’ “, by Chanda Cooper-Warren.... [tags: Risk and Reward]
654 words (1.9 pages)
- If the question was posed as to what is the debate between creationism vs. evolution consist of, the thought that it is ‘“God did it” vs. “Natural processes did it,”’ (Scott, 2004) may arise. Science cannot absolutely prove or disprove Creation or Evolution. Yet scientist and the remainder of society use creationism and evolution to prove our existence. Creationist believe in the Christian account of the origin as recorded in Genesis. Creationism is the belief that statements such as “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (NIV) found in Genesis 1:1 and also “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (NIV) found in John 1:1.... [tags: science vs religion]
1637 words (4.7 pages)
- The Great Debate Creation by God. The Big Bang. Books, manuscripts, scientific papers, scriptural works, documentaries, ancient artifacts, and countless web sites all deliver differing theories, most with finales of doom. One could logically suppose that a big boom did occur when this mysterious form of existence sprang into being. Attempting to argue the theories surrounding the birth of the universe, one by the hand of a Supreme Being and the other by an instantaneous explosion of energy, is a useless debate and huge waste of time.... [tags: Science, Religion, Big Bang]
795 words (2.3 pages)
- DOES SCIENCE MAKE PEOPLE ASIDE FROM RELIGION. Science does drive people away from their religion because it provides elucidations and makes people analyze what religion obligates to believe. People have to accept what the religion says with no opportunity to question it. Besides, science approves what religion does not, for example clonation, heliocentrism and the origin of life; also, the morning-after pill which was developed by the science and the religion is dissident about it. The bunch of proofs that science has supplied, has put humanity in doubt and has unbalanced the belief of the origins of life.... [tags: faith, evidence, life]
717 words (2 pages)
- According to Victor Hugo “Faith is a necessity to a man. Woe to him who believes in nothing” (Hugo). Faith, or the unquestioning belief in something, is crucial to the maintenance of society, and in fact makes up the majority of its foundations. Faith is more pervasive of one’s entire being than trust and, when exploited, can have both positive and negative effects on the individual and society. Faith’s consequences upon the human mind affect both reason and emotion, both of which are explored in this essay.... [tags: Religion, Science]
1620 words (4.6 pages)
- Personal Perspective on the Science Versus Religion Debate In Alfred North Whitehead’s “Religion and Science”, he nullifies the argument between the religious factions and scientists of the world by eliminating all grounds for the argument. Although debated to the “ends of the Earth”, Whitehead points out that these two subjects are actually based upon events that are unrelated. He states “Science is concerned with the general conditions which are observed to regulate phenomenon; whereas religion is wholly wrapped up in the contemplation of moral and aesthetic values”(Whitehead, Religion and Science).... [tags: Theology]
586 words (1.7 pages)