Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty

1479 Words3 Pages

Carlos DeLuca and Carlos Hernandez were together on the day of the murder of Wanda Lopez, but ultimately DeLuna was the one executed for the murder. Although DeLuna stated his innocence and named Carlos Hernandez to be the real killer but prosecutors did not believe him as they could find any existence of Hernandez. It took only one day to find DeLuna innocent four years after his death by Professor James Liebman and a private investigator. Liebman and the P.I. found that Carlos Hernandez was, in fact, the killer and that he even confessed to the murder on multiple occasions. The death penalty has been an ongoing debate of whether or not it should be abolished in the United States. But there are cases like DeLuna should make it clear as day that the death penalty should be abolished. Not only should the death penalty be abolished for the deaths of innocent inmates but …show more content…

It teaches the lesson that it is acceptable to kill, as long as the state is the one doing the killing." (Bushman). One would think that government would set a good example to the youth nut instead it shows that if you have power you can get away with murder legally. The death penalty is supposed to be used as a teaching method to the rest of the world that killing is wrong yet the states seem to contradict themselves. The federal government is stating that the only people allowed to kill are the states because they have the power to do so legally and there is nothing wrong with that. But there is plenty wrong with it like the fact that the death penalty violates the right of humans. Humans are allowed to their basic rights and allowing the death penalty to be legal is a huge violation (Love). The people have a right to life and allowing someone else to determine whether or not they get to live is wrong. No other human should make that choice for someone no matter how bad of a crime they have

Open Document