Edward Koch Death Penalty Analysis

1581 Words4 Pages

Edward Koch, who was former mayor of New York, wrote an article about one of the most controversial talks called the death penalty. This controversial topic questions if it is right to execute a person for a crime committed or if it is wrong. He made the point that the death penalty is good, in order to conclude that murderers should be punish with this penalty. He was bias in most of the passage, yet he tried to acknowledge other people’s opinion. In this article, Koch gives his supports to the idea to convict a murderer with death penalty by using a tone of objectiveness, shooting for the individuals who opposes his position to be the audience, and have a written form of conviction for the audience. The purpose of this argument is to support …show more content…

In the two cases, the murderers were convict with death penalty, which they did not like. Those individuals, tried to safe their life by stating that the law should not do what they did, talking about murdering. Edward Koch clearly did not accept the statement of the convicted. As he concluded the back-story of these two murderers, he said that the law should not take the word of a criminal. In other words, he meant that what the criminals said it was a door for them to try to escape their punishment and safe themselves from being …show more content…

Pathos was use often in this story to show his compassion to those affected victims, and his disagreement toward the opposing individuals of the death penalty. In the article, the writer put sentences that had emotion that the writer convoke to the audience. For example, in the last two paragraphs he mentions the case of a murder victim that is not help. At the beginning, Koch showed sadness, then toward the end, he displayed the madness he felt toward those who did not do something to help. He believes that the opposing group toward death penalty are the same as the people that did not do anything to help. With this emotion, the author was able to make the reader thoughtful whether not supporting death penalty makes justice of the inoffensive victim. Although the writer uses a considerable amount of emotion, he does not go to an extreme, which would made his argument emotional for the reader to lost interest of

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Death And Justice By Ed Koch

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay “Death and Justice”, Ed Koch, the former mayor of New York City, presents an argument defending the use of capital punishment in heinous murder cases. In advancing his viewpoint on the subject matter, Koch addresses the arguments made by those who oppose the death penalty. This novel approach to making an argument not only engages the reader more in the piece, but also immediately illustrates his balanced understanding of both sides of the argument. Rather than simply presenting a biased or one-sided argument regarding his opinion, Koch explores a full range of issues surrounding the incendiary issue and displays both balance and erudition in expression his opinion on the issue of capital punishment.

    Read More

  • Persuasion Of The Death Penalty By Ed Koch And David Bruck

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty, a subject that is often the cause of major controversy, has become an integral part of the southern justice system in recent years. The supporters and opponents of this issue have heatedly debated each other about whether or not the death penalty should be allowed. They back their arguments with moral, logical, and ethical appeals, as seen in the essays by Ed Koch and David Bruck. Although both authors are on opposite sides of the issue, they use the same ideas to back up their argument, while ignoring others that they don’t have evidence for. Koch and Bruck’s use of moral, logical, and ethical persuasion enhance both of their arguments and place a certain importance on the issue of the death penalty, making the readers come to the realization that it is more than just life and death, or right and wrong; there are so many implications that make the issue much more 3-dimensional. In dealing with politics and controversial issues such as capital punishment.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Death And Justice How Capital Punishment Affirms Life By Edward Koch

    144 Words  | 1 Pages

    The essay “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” by Edward I. Koch, is a rather conservative outlook of the death penalty from a member of the Democratic Party. It first appeared in The New Republic, a magazine that is known for its controversial articles. In the essay, Koch effectively argues the fact that capital punishment is not only a deterrent for crime, but also affirms the sanctity of life.

    Read More

  • Anna Quindlen Death Penalty Rhetorical Analysis

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the topic of the death penalty, she says, “The only reason for a death penalty is to exact retribution. Is there anyone who really thinks that it is a deterrent, that there are considerable numbers of criminals out there who think twice about committing crimes because of the sentence involved?” (p. 553). Here, she brings up a good question: do criminals care about the sentence? Is the death penalty only for the gratification of those who the criminal wronged? Quindlen seems to think so, with her reason being that “the ones [she has] met in [her] professional duties have either sneered at the justice system, where they can exchange one charge for another with more ease than they could return a shirt to a clothing store, or they have simply believed that it is the other guy who will get caught, get convicted, get the stiffest sentence” (p. 553). This makes her claims make more sense: she compares criminals exchanging charges for lesser ones with shirts being exchanged for different ones. It is a form of personal experience: criminals do not fear the justice system in the way we want to believe they do. By using her own experience for this, Quindlen not only furthers her beliefs that the death penalty is useless, but shows her readers why she thinks it is useless. Criminals are not afraid of any form of punishment as is, thus there is no reason to believe they are afraid of the death penalty as

    Read More

  • Summary Of Death And Justice By Edward Koch

    525 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his article “Death and Justice”, Edward Koch insightfully argues his reasons for supporting capital punishment. He explains his position for supporting the death penalty by examining common arguments against it. The arguments are: how the death penalty is inhumane, how no other democracy uses it, how there is a chance for an innocent person to be put to death, how it diminishes the value of life, how it is used discriminatorily, how it is against Biblical principles, and how it is allowing the state to murder.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Analysis

    1062 Words  | 3 Pages

    He states, “In Arizona on July 23rd, prison officials needed nearly two hours to complete the execution of double murderer Joseph Wood. Our long search for the perfect mode of killing-quiet, tidy, and superficially humane-has brought us to this: rooms full of witnesses shifting miserably in their seats as unconscious men writhe and snort and gasp while strapped to gurneys” (Von Drehle, 2015). He attempts to strike an emotional chord in his audience by using this statement to provide imagery while at the same time attempting to raise questions on how necessary the death penalty is. By including this statement, Von Drehle helps strengthen his claim by including another flaw that may contribute to the potential fall of capital punishment, and by using this quote he attempts to make his audience feel and realize these flaws as

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Essay

    979 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever wondered why people are so interested to learn about the suffrage of others? Over twenty-five years, the population of prisoners has nearly sextulped. Reaching about 1.7 million since 1996, which is almost equal to the population to Houston, Texas, the fourth largest city in the nation (Elliott Currie). All we focus on is how they did it? and why? In other words, many people interpret crime as entertainment, and don’t think about the negative effects taking place in the world or even more that individual. In some cases the innocent are being accused of unlikely punishment but how do they determine? Considerably, the death penalty has been the topic of discussion these past years. This so called “penalty” is becoming the prime consequence in most cases. I think that the use of the death penalty as punishment is wrong because of the psychological effects it has on prisoners, time spent on death row in cases of innocents, and the costly outcome.

    Read More

  • David B. Muhlhausen's Article: How The Death Penalty Saves Lives

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    “How the Death Penalty Saves Lives” According to DPIC (Death penalty information center), there are one thousand –four hundred thirty- eight executions in the United States since 1976. Currently, there are Two thousand –nine hundred –five inmates on death row, and the average length of time on death row is about fifteen years in the United States. The Capital punishment, which appears on the surface to the fitting conclusion to the life of a murder, in fact, a complicated issue that produces no clear resolution.; However, the article states it’s justice. In the article “How the Death Penalty Saves Lives” an author David B. Muhlhausen illustrates a story of Earl Ringo , Jr, brutal murder’s execution on September ,10,

    Read More

  • Bruck Death Penalty

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the feature essay “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” the author, Edward I Koch illustrates his opinion about why he supports the death penalty and believes all life is precious. In the essay he provides seven arguments that people have when they are against capital punishment and those seven arguments are; the death penalty is “barbaric,” No other mayor democracy uses the death penalty, an innocent person might be executed by mistake, capital punishment cheapens the value of human life, the death penalty is applied in a discriminatory, Thou shalt not kill, the death penalty I state-sanctioned murder.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty Robert Blecker Summary

    1439 Words  | 3 Pages

    Robert Blecker the author of the article “With death penalty, let punishment truly fit the crime” believes the death penalty should be abolished. He thinks sentencing offenders to death is just giving them a taste of death and “satisfies our deepest instincts of justice” (Blecker), but they do not really realize the mistakes they made. In addition, Blecker describes his personal experience as a witness to an execution which made him “shuddered” (Blecker) and he notes the “lethal injection appears, feels and seems medical, although it sole purpose is to kill” (Blecker). The medicine is usually used as a treatment but for the defendant it is the poison brings them to hell. According to Blecker’s observation, he finds out instead of those misdemeanor inmates, who commit serious crimes lived a more comfortable prison cell. Moreover, Blecker also satirized the justice system: “we recoil from punishing those who most deserve it, we readily over punish those who don’t” (Blecker) by saying that is to ironically the American prison give the felony a better living condition as a “punishment” for what they did, the justice system need to be fixed. In the end of the article, he suggests the rest of us to stand up to protect the right of prisoners and hopes to change to way of punishment give every prisoner an equitableness

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

    1653 Words  | 4 Pages

    Employing pathos and logos, Baude gives an explanation for why the death penalty is flawed as he tells the tale of a man on death row. Baude claims “.Judgments, right or wrong. This concern with concepts such as finality, jurisdiction, and the balance of powers may sound technical, lawyerly, and highly abstract. But so is the criminal justice system. Law must provide simple answers: innocence or guilt, freedom or imprisonment, life or death.”

    Read More

  • James Holmes Death Penalty Analysis

    1106 Words  | 3 Pages

    They state that taking a life can undermine the principle that killing is the wrong thing to do. The author also states that they have been long time opponents of the death penalty, so the reader can get a sense of what opinions the author has about the situation. They use some very effective key points in their argument that may sway a reader’s opinion from one side to the other. One key point they talk about is James Holmes being mentally ill. He was diagnosed with some form of schizophrenia which may have led to the event that had happened. Putting this in the article gives the reader clarity about James as a

    Read More

  • Death Penalty: Edward Koch Vs David Bruck

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    Suppose you live under someone else's command: Night and day, they are the one who have the privilege of deciding when or what you eat, sleep, wake up, what to wear, and where to go. Suppose this other person even gets to decide when and how you die. Who gives them this right? Who instilled in them this power? The death penalty – an extremely controversial issue – seems to be a topic great debate in the 1980's.

    Read More

  • What Is The Death Penalty Ethical?

    265 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the most highly controversial topic in regards to ethics, is the application of the death penalty. Numerous groups have protested against it, as they claim it falls under “cruel and unusual punishment”, which citizens are protected against. However, other groups declare just the opposite, stating that unspeakable crimes need to be paid with retribution. Many of these groups consist of general public members, simply everyday people who strive to have a large impact on this topic. With regards to politics in America and an array of other countries, the public plays a large role in shaping political and criminal laws. For that reason, any policymaking needs to take in the public’s view and analyzation of public view is essential.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Position Paper

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.

    Read More

More about Edward Koch Death Penalty Analysis

Open Document