When it comes to the topic of capital murder, most of us will readily agree that the murderer must pay the consequences. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question the death penalty being the proper solution. Whereas some are convinced that capital punishment is the needed consequence of first degree murder. Others maintain that this method is not a wise economic solution, and does not deter crime. I tend to agree with these individuals and stand against the death penalty.
In recent discussions of capital punishment, it is shown that the death penalty is not a deterrent and crime rates do not decrease because of death penalty. According to Hugo Adam Bedau Ph.D., “Of all those convicted on a charge of criminal homicide, only 3 percent - about 1 in 33 - are eventually sentenced to death” (Bedau). The reason this statistic is so crucial, is because most first degree murders are not premeditated, a requirement needed to sentence an inmate who committed a first degree murder to death. Bedau goes on to explain, “Most capital crimes are committed during moments of great emotional stress, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, when logical thinking has been suspended”. The aspect of Bedau’s claim is that when these criminals commit murder, they do not consider the potential consequences, one being the death penalty. For example, if an individual was to find their partner in a sexual act with someone else, and this individual happens to have a gun and shoots the partner, in legal terms the shooter does not deserve the death penalty. Similar to what Bedau said, this sort of murder is seen as in the heat of the moment, this is a major reason why capital punishment is not a deterrent to capital cri...
... middle of paper ...
...usive reasoning why the death penalty may not bring justice to the families.
The truth of the matter is that the death penalty delivers less that what the cost implies. We cannot carelessly spend money, especially when there are more beneficial solutions to a major economic problem. The death penalty is a flawed, expensive, solution for first degree murder, and we should not have to contribute more money for ruthless human beings to gain the easy way out. First degree murder is inevitable, and for what statistics show, the death penalty is not a deterrent, and never will be. From personal experience, I understand how an individual could jump to the conclusion that the death penalty is the logical answer for murder, but further research and undeniable facts should lead others to understand a larger problem most do not know exists when maintaining the death penalty.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
853 words (2.4 pages)
- The death penalty seems to be a very debatable subject. There are arguments and support for both sides of the debate, but which side is right. That is a tough question to ask. After reading the article in the textbook, two other articles, and looking at statistics, I seem to feel that the death penalty may not be the right answer. The article in the textbook The Death Penalty in the United States and Worldwide was fairly informative. One of the points it brought up was the cost of life without parole vs the death penalty, and those costs were stated as life without parole costing 1.1 million dollars vs the death penalty costing 3 million dollars (Schaefer, Richard T, 2009 pg 176).... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- Since the reinstatement of the death penalty by the Supreme Court in 1976 there have been 1,245 criminals legally put to death as a punishment for a multitude of disturbing crimes (6). The death penalty’s reinstatement as a possible punishment for crimes ranging from treason to murder has brought the constitutionality and morality of the punishment into question by anti-capital punishment protesters. This has led to a great deal of debate between pro- and anti- capital punishment supporters. Defenders of the death penalty state that it is an effective deterrent and punishment for murder (1), while the opposing side claims that it is the definition of hypocrisy at an ultimate and inhumane lev... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
2110 words (6 pages)
- "More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no longer giving any excuses for killing humans.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
972 words (2.8 pages)
- To date, the United States has 32 states with the death penalty and 18 without it (“States With and Without the Death Penalty.”). In 2012, there were approximately 14,827 murders and 760,739 aggravated assaults (“United States Crime Rates 1960 - 2012.”), but only 43 people were put to death by execution that year (“Execution List 2012.”). Those numbers just don’t seem to piece together. For every 100,000 people in 2012, about 8% of the murders in the United States occurred in Michigan, a non-death penalty state ("Murder Rates Nationally and By State.").... [tags: legal issues, death penalty]
934 words (2.7 pages)
- In the past death sentence was believed as the best punishment for anyone who took another’s life. This was practised in many Nations until questions as to whether it was really an adequate punishment arose. Does killing the murderer really help the situation. The penalty later got attacks for religious groups and people who based their arguments on the morality of the punishment. Questions like, who really suffers when the convict is killed is it him or his family. Other queries would be as to whether killing the murderer benefits the family of the victim.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
2573 words (7.4 pages)
- Just the very mentioning of the “death penalty” can bring out a fury in most people. Those for the death penalty argue that it creates deterrence, punishment, and justice. While those that oppose the death penalty argue about the risk of executing an innocent person or life in prison is a worst punishment. Crime is an obvious element of society and something needs to deter people from committing criminal acts. The question lies in the methods and actions in which to deal with each crime. As a nation, we must have zero tolerance for horrific crimes such as murder and we must have a just punishment for a crime to insure some control over criminals.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
1248 words (3.6 pages)
- Throughout history, Americans have pursued what was needed or wanted; determination is the American way. If fledgling colonies needed more food to support families, a farmer cultivated more crops; if communities wanted more supplies, companies mass produced until desires were met. Nonetheless, if a new idea turned out to be corrupt, then the thought was discontinued and effaced from memory. In today’s twenty first century society, an idea from the past has become crooked and is no longer needed.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
1712 words (4.9 pages)
- Why is the death penalty still allowed throughout much of the U.S.. The process of prosecuting and convicting an individual is astronomical, and there is great debate as to whether the death penalty actually works as a deterrent. Retribution and biasness have contributed too many that have received this sentence, considering all this, life imprisonment is best for all, realistically, and most effective. The advantages of life imprisonment far more outweigh the death sentence. Death Penalty America has always had a history of using the death penalty, but no subject has received greater debate.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
1792 words (5.1 pages)
- The issue of the death penalty has been of great concern and debate for a number of years now. Prior to 1976, the death penalty was banned in the United States. In 1976, though, the ban was lifted, and many states adopted the death penalty in their constitutions. Currently, there are 38 states that use the death penalty, and only 12 states that do not. The states that have the death penalty use a number of ways to go about executing the defendant. Thirty-two states use lethal injection, 10 use electrocution, 6 use the gas chamber, 2 use hanging, and 2 states use a firing squad (Death Penalty Information Center, 1997).... [tags: Capital Punishment Essay]
2044 words (5.8 pages)