A world with no crime is just too much to ask for. A world that makes an effort to keep out the danger is more realistic. The only question is how do you keep the danger away from everyone? How can you punish someone so much to where they deserve what they did and it brings closure to the victim’s family? At this point in today’s society you can only punish someone to a maximum limit because of all the laws and rights we acquire today . Locking someone in prison for the rest of their life for murdering a family is how we discipline nowadays. Now no one said the prison life is excellent, but you still wake up every morning and go about your day like nothing happened; the only difference is you 're just living your life in prison. The death penalty is a vigorous solution to get rid of the bad and to protect the good.
“On June 25th, 2008, Patrick Kennedy was sentenced to death for the rape of his 8 year-old stepdaughter. In Louisiana there is an authorized capital punishment ( death penalty) for the rape of children under the age of 12” (Death Penalty- ProCon). Someone who can obtain the ability to treat a child under the age of 12 like that and be so cruel should be sentenced to death with no questions asked. Now because of all these laws the sentences could be reversed. “ The Supreme Court concluded that the Eighth Amendment bars Louisiana from imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child where the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim’s death (Death Penalty- ProCon).” The ability to reverse a sentence is a complete mistake. Just because the child was not killed does not mean Kennedy does not deserve capital punishment. The child is traumatized for the rest of her life Sexual...
... middle of paper ...
...ase the violence. Less damage is adopted to prevent more violence. “ .. execution brings closure to the murderer’s crime and ensures that the murderer will create no more victims” (Death Penalty Curriculum). It’s really common sense if you get rid of the bad there is no negativity that the society needs to focus on. Getting rid of a murderer keeps everyone safe, it ensures that the victim’s family is safe from any further violence and the people who were involved or were around will stay safe. Putting someone dangerous in prison ensures that the outsiders safety is definite, but everyone else inside the prison like inmates and officer risk their safety. “.. in prison, it is not uncommon for those receiving life in jail sentences to commit homicide, suicide, or other crimes while in jail, since there is no worse punishment they can receive” (Idebate).
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Throughout much of America’s history there has been conflicting thoughts on the matter of taking the life of another in the pursuit of justice. Many have said it is inhumane, wrong, and hypocritical. Others claim it to be justifiable, with roots in Biblical scripture: "an-eye-for-an-eye". The guillotine, electric chair, and lethal injection have one goal, that is to kill its subject. Today, we face the choice to continue or abolish the death penalty. The general consensus hitherto has always been in favor for the death penalty.... [tags: Anti-Death Penalty Essay]
1527 words (4.4 pages)
- The Death Penalty: Too High of a Price to Pay. Should we stick with capital punishment or eradicate the death penalty. This is a question that has been asked and argued over for decades. The majority of people have already formulated an opinion on the death penalty, usually an extremely strong opinion, whether it is for or against the use of capital punishment. However, when you eliminate the moral and emotional arguments and look purely at the financial cost of the death penalty that is placed on the taxpayers, taking into account the average difference in the cost of the trial and of housing death row inmates as compared to a person sentenced to life in prison and the length of time a dea... [tags: Prison, Capital punishment, Penology, Murder]
934 words (2.7 pages)
- When the country is in debt, and states are facing budget shortages, $620,932 is a lot of tax money to spend on one criminal to pursue the death penalty (“Death Penalty Information Center”). The death penalty should not be legal in the United States because putting the criminal in prison would keep people safe and cost much less money than following through with the death penalty, capital punishment has also been proven not to be a deterrent, and defendants are not treated equally. The cost alone should be enough to abolish capital punishment because of the funds it dries up when more money could go towards crime prevention.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
2054 words (5.9 pages)
- "More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no longer giving any excuses for killing humans.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
972 words (2.8 pages)
- To Die or Not to Die A Gallup Poll shows that “61% of Americans view the death penalty as morally acceptable” (Muhlhausen 1). Despite this statistic, much controversy revolves around the topic of capital punishment. However, the issue very complicated. Questions related to morality, deterrence, and cost are all part of the debate. Professors David Muhlhausen and Philip Holloway take different stances on the death penalty debate in two articles. David Muhlhausen believes the death penalty should be used, whereas Phillip Holloway thinks capital punishment is not appropriate.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Death row]
1151 words (3.3 pages)
- apital Punishment is legal authorized killings of someone as punishment for a crime. Capital punishment is a controversial subject debated across America and has been going on for at least 400 hundred years. It has recently come up for debate because people feel it is inhumane to kill people by lethal injection or electric chair because it takes too long to kill the victim. Also innocent people have been put on death row and executed which leaves their families in distraught. There are people who want to abolish the death penalty because it is ineffective and several execution have been botched, which are the abolitionist, and people who still want the death penalty to continue because som... [tags: Capital punishment, Death row, Crime, Murder]
1255 words (3.6 pages)
- When it comes to punishing criminals, people have a variety of ideas-especially when murder becomes a part of the discussion. Although there are plenty of options proposed, from torture to life in prison, one of the most debated methods is the death penalty. The death penalty, defined simply, is the practice of allowing the imposition of death as a punishment for those convicted of certain crimes, usually murder. While thirty-one states allow capital punishment, an argument that has been raging since the early 1970s is still going on.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Prison, Death row]
1746 words (5 pages)
- Why is the death penalty still allowed throughout much of the U.S.. The process of prosecuting and convicting an individual is astronomical, and there is great debate as to whether the death penalty actually works as a deterrent. Retribution and biasness have contributed too many that have received this sentence, considering all this, life imprisonment is best for all, realistically, and most effective. The advantages of life imprisonment far more outweigh the death sentence. Death Penalty America has always had a history of using the death penalty, but no subject has received greater debate.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
1792 words (5.1 pages)
- The federal government has an obligation to make just laws. Currently, US laws allow for the death penalty for certain heinous crimes. The supporters argue that the 5th Amendment, which guarantees that no one shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” implies that depriving someone of his or her life is permissible under the constitution as long as there is due process. However, there are several reasons why the federal government must abolish the death penalty - it weakens US moral authority over other nations; there have been too many wrongful convictions for death penalty in the US; the death penalty is in conflict with the 8th amendment of the US const... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
1270 words (3.6 pages)
- Let us suppose that killing, as a form of punishment, is morally and universally accepted. Would it then be acceptable to issue this to some, while letting others avoid it. It is acceptable to our criminal justice system for it seems to be standard operating procedure. Many believe the death penalty based on the “Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth” concept. The death penalty is improper due to the price and time of executing someone, that it isn’t a deterrent against violent crime, and how immoral and contradicting it is.... [tags: Capital Punishment Death Penalty essays papers]
661 words (1.9 pages)