Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
mona lisa smile feminist critique
mona lisa smile the movie gender roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: mona lisa smile feminist critique
Sequence Analysis: Dead Poets Society and Mona Lisa Smile
The Behaviour of the Students: In both movies, we see a lot of how the students interact amongst themselves. In Dead Poets Society, we see the boys running around and being playful and friendly with one another. We also see them building a radio, having their “study sessions,” and, eventually, resurrect the Dead Poets club and attend the meetings that follow. The boys are friendly with each other overall, with little to no feuds in most of the movies duration. They also show more openness to Mr.Keating and what he has to teach the students. In contrast, throughout Mona Lisa Smile, we learn a lot less about what the girls might be interested in doing with their free time. We see them
…show more content…
So in this case, when we see the girls participating in activities mostly surrounding their futures with their husbands and fitting into the ‘trophy wife’ depiction, we side with Watson in thinking the girls should want more out of their lives because society is less inclined to the idea that a woman’s job is strictly to take care of her husband and children. Because Watson defies these ideas in the movie and is presented as if she came out of our own time and because the girls only look to amount to what is expected of them, we see them as unambitious to our standards of what living is, and because of their behaviour towards each other and their teacher, we see them as rude and snobby and thus become attached to Ms.Watson as someone more relatable to the audience. Although Dead Poets Society is set in the late 1950s (released in 1989), these times don 't seem to matter as much about why the characters do what they do. Although there are expectations put on the boys, they are less clear and specific and have more to do with successfulness in work later in life. The movie focuses more on their interests in activities and we see the boys rebelling in small ways against their expectations and authority. A scene where two of the boys …show more content…
Dead Poet Society’s Welton Academy being an all boys school and Mona Lisa Smile’s Wellesley College, an all girls school. You could almost tie many of the differences in the plot of these films into the difference in gender; especially with the time periods these movies are set in. Because they focus on singular genders you do not see the issue of conflicting feminist views in Dead Poets Society but instead the boys artistic wants, and in Mona Lisa Smile you that is what the main focus is. Mona Lisa Smile’s attention is on the societal ideas of what a woman’s life will pan out to be and how Katherine Watson encourages the girls she teaches to want more out of life than just to take care of a husband and raise a few children. This movie expresses a lot of the conflict leading into feminist movements at the time. Even though we see a lot of young men throughout the movie in relation to the girls, we mostly see how unaffected they are by Ms. Watson’s views and how they expect that these girls, who they plan to marry, will do just as they, and everyone else expect them to. This is significant because it shows just how powerful societal norms and influenced wants are and how breaking things of tradition seems like a foreign concept. Tradition is something that is seen as never changing. Obviously, to society in 2003, we feel that they are the absurd ones. To the audience it looks as though
The second scene of the film opens up to Vincent Vega and Jules Winnfield drivi...
Can you recall the very last night that you spent with your high school buddies before packing your bags and leaving for college? The films American Graffiti and Dazed and Confused bring you back to that through the recreation of those great experiences. American Graffiti is based on a closely-knit group of teenagers who will all be leaving each other the next day for new adventures. This gang of teenagers, despite their differences, all goes out together and share their last memorable evening. Throughout the night, friendships are strengthened, conflicting struggles arise, and romances are created and disrupted. Dazed and Confused dealt about life during wartime – the wartime of high school, where the faculty is irrational, the parents are
The negative consequences of mean girls’ harsh bullying (depression, suicidal thoughts, and eating disorders) are absent in the movie. Therefore, the viewer will associate bullying with ‘coolness’ as they showcase it when students were asked about Regina Georges, and one of them said “One time she punched me in the face and I loved it”.
Daisy wanted to drive Gatsby’s car and was cheating on Tom. Jordan was a golf champion. It was usual for the men to be dishonest to their spouses, but not for women. A thing like driving cars was a “mans thing to do”. Also there were certain sports that women just weren’t supposed to play. Along with the emergence into society, came a new set of morals. Women were beginning to think and act for themselves. They changed the man made stereotypes that they had been brought up to think, into something brand new. “Never had a drink before, but oh how I do enjoy it”(Gatsby pg.
Jane Austin, author of Pride and Prejudice, is critical of the gender injustices and portrays that through her character. The women in Pride and Prejudice are dependent on men for social status and financial security. The women either needed to be born into the social high class or they have to get married to have social status and wealth. Men vi...
During this time period there was a very distinct line of gender roles. Women were viewed as homemakers, while the men were seen as the money-makers. Women did work and go to school just like men, however, women were given easy labor – front office type of work, and men took on more mighty and powerful careers. This was a drastic change in pace for women as they were forced to work hard laborious jobs during the industrialization era a few years prior to this time. Caulfield may not have wanted to accept the lifestyle that society was encouraging at that time, although, he did appear accepting of the gender roles that were being imposed. This can be seen during a date with his on-again off-again flame Sally Hayes, he attempts to pitch a juvenile idea that they do not have to live this life of conformity and they could just run away together. He makes promises that he will find work and home for them and perhaps get married. Sally points out to Holden that they are merely children and these types of acts are not possible as they need to obtain a college education before they can run off and get married. She also mentions that if Holden was unable to find a job they would starve, which implies to this author that they two of them believed heavily in the idea of the man working and the woman being dependent of the man. Other examples of gender roles can be seen throughout this novel.
Basically the Victorian era sucked for women. During the beginning they were expected to be smart, but to not have an opinion. They were to be beautiful, yet act and appear virginal. Women were also
“There is a double standard here that shapes our perceptions of men and women in ways that support patriarchy as a system. What is culturally valued is associated with masculinity and maleness and what is devalued is associated with femininity and femaleness, regardless of the reality of men’s and women’s lives”,( Johnson 64). In the movie Mona Lisa Smile, Betty’s mother was pressurizing Betty to make her husband read a poem at the wedding not just to act like he enjoyed the marriage but mainly because it was a tradition for men. When Betty said she didn’t care about it, her mother refused and still insisted that she should do it. Women are looked down upon when it comes to the assignment of gender roles and this is because of labels that the society has placed on the female gender. In a home, the father is always the head of the home, providing food and clothing for every family member but there are some women who like to be independent and would also love to work and make money and cater for the family. In the 19th century, women were told they were home makers and were not allowed to endeavor further in higher educational studies. Wellesley College was a college built to raise future wives and not future leaders meaning that society had already placed women below the ladder without any intention or thoughts of them climbing back
This is clearly evident in Betty Warren’s condemnation of Professor Katherine Watson’s progressive, feminist ideals. Warren writes, “It is our duty- nay, obligation to reclaim our place in the home . . . Her [Watson] subversive and political teachings encourage our Wellesley girls to reject the roles they were born to fill” (01:08:01-01:08:28). By writing this, she clearly indicates that Watson’s denial of a traditional lifestyle is deplorable. Warren also implies that Watson is not a respectable woman, being as she lives a lifestyle that is not in accordance with what a woman is meant to do. The entire publication is a direct attack on Watson’s gender identity, being that it suggests that she is not feminine enough. Warren hopes that with this publication, Watson will quiet her voice. This is her way of maintaining the patriarchal elements of their society.
A change in feminism is shown between Wollstonecraft’s essay and Young’s essay. As women first demanded rights, they were coming out of complete dependence on men. Wollstonecraft and other activists fought for the basic right of education for women. As women gained liberty, they began to oppress themselves in the Third Wave of feminism. Wollstonecraft focused on the basic rights of women in her paper, saying “They must be permitted to turn to the fountain of light, and not forced to shape their course by the twinkling of a mere satellite” (Wollstonecraft 5). Here Wollstonecraft is saying that women need to be given the opportunity to get a good education, not just be taught by what their husbands tell them, so they could be their better selves.
Wollstonecraft expresses how gender roles in society, do in fact create social problems, because unequal relationships are formed, focusing on what is expected of women and men separately, not a society as a whole. I agree with her fight of feminism, believing that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. I also agree that education definitely plays a huge role in shaping an individual, which is why still today, children are required to attend school, to learn the fundamentals of what is important in life and set them up for what is ahead of them after school is finished. Clearly the equality of men and women has been a topic of discussion since the world began, always fighting for the same respect that men get. If you think about it, back then, women were always being taught how to be the most attractive they can be and abide by their husbands wishes. Now, women have more freedom of speech and more power in intimate relationships but a woman’s body is used as a sex object for increased popularity in advertisements and
Over the centuries, women’s duties or roles in the home and in the work force have arguably changed for the better. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen teaches the reader about reputation and loves in the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries by showing how Elizabeth shows up in a muddy dress, declines a marriage proposal and how women have changed over time. Anything a woman does is reflected on her future and how other people look at her. When Elizabeth shows up to the Bingley’s in a muddy dress they categorize her as being low class and unfashionable. Charles Bingley, a rich attractive man, and his sister had a reputation to protect by not letting their brother marry a ‘low class girl’. Reputation even today and back in the nineteenth century is still very important aspect in culture. In the twenty-first century, women have attempted to make their lives easier by wanting to be more equal with the men in their society. Women are wanting to be the apart of the ‘bread winnings’ efforts within a family. Since evolving from the culture of the nineteenth century, women have lost a lot of family and home making traditions but women have gained equality with more rights such as voting, working, and overall equal rights. In the twenty-first century world, most women are seen for losing their morals for and manners for others. As for example in the novel when Mr. Darcy is talking badly about Elizabeth she over hears what he and his friend, Mr. Bingley, are saying about her but she does not stand up for herself.
In the novel, Emma, Austen introduced her audience to a new idea of patriarchy. While she is known to satirize society for the “faulty education of female children, limited expectations for girls and women, and the perils of the marriage market” (“Austen, Jane”). Austen expresses the irony of the men of her patriarchal society and proposes the ideal gentleman in Mr. Knightley. In Emma, Austen moves away from “a traditional idea of 'natural' male supremacy towards a 'modern' notion of gender equity” (Marsh). Jane Austen is a revolutionary in the way she transforms the idea of Nineteenth Century patriarchy by not “reinforcing the traditional gender stereotypes” (Rosenbury) but instead challenging the status quo. While her characters still hold some ties to traditional ideals, Austen proves to be ahead of her time, influencing the way gender is regarded today.
As previously mentioned, inferiority perceptions and obstacles for women remain prevalent in the twenty-first century. Although substantial progress has been made with regards to the educational opportunities for women, as well as educating both men and women to view women with equal regard, we have yet to achieve parity among genders. In particular, “Contemporary feminists, such as Catherine MacKinnon, argue that the law and society’s political institutions are based on male assumptions, such that women can never achieve equality within them” (Tannenbaum, 2012, p. 220). Additionally, the recent focus on gender socialization directly relates to Wollstonecraft’s writings. In fact, she may be one of the first philosophers to establish the foundation for studying gender socialization through her assertions from two hundred years ago, “the character of women was artificial, and a consequence of the roles society defines for them” (p. 213a). Tannenbaum’s summary of Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women, reads as though it’s from a current Sociology course in gender equality and diversity. “Women are fond of dress and gossip; are helpless, emotional, weak; and act like children, not because it is there nature, but because they are educated or trained this way” (p. 213b). Wollstonecraft’s assertions were revolutionary when taking into account the historical context of her vision. Hence, both genders can benefit from studying her feminist perspective, then contemplating how her vision has evolved over time in society, as well as advocating for its continued
The movie, “Mona Lisa Smile” is an inspirational film that explores life through feminism, marriage, and education lead by a modernist teacher at the end of a traditional era. It begins by introducing the lead character, Katherine Watson (Julia Roberts), a liberal-minded novice professor from California, who lands a job in the art history department at a snobbish, all-girl college, called Wellesley, in the fall of 1953. Despite warnings from her boyfriend Paul that a Boston Brahmin environment was out of her element, Katherine was thrilled at the prospect of educating some of the brightest young women in the country however, her image of Wellesley quickly fizzles after her first day of class, in which, was more like a baptism by fire. Her smug students flaunted their exhaustive knowledge of the text and humiliated her in front of a supervisor. However, Katherine, determined not to buckle under pressure, departs from the syllabus in order to regain the upper hand. She quickly challenged the girls’ idea of what constituted art and exposed them to modern artist not endorsed by the school board. She dared them to think for themselves, and explore outside of their traditional views. This form of art was unacceptable by the students at first however, overtime Katherine penetrated her student’s distain and earned their esteem.