The Day After

1309 Words3 Pages

The Day After (1983) The Day After was an effective way of instilling a sense of both fear and respect for nuclear war into the minds of the American people. By portraying realistic doomsday scenarios that are played out in the lives of relatable families in a small city not unlike any other we would find in America, this film contextualizes the events prior to, during, and immediately after nuclear exchange between the United States and Russia was unleashed onto our own soil. Background Nuts and Bolts The Day After was a film originally envisioned by Brandon Stoddard, president of ABC Motion Picture Division, who wanted to explore the effects of a nuclear exchange on United States soil. The script was written in 1981 by an Edward Hume, commissioned by Stoddard, being focused primarily on the world’s aftermath of the nuclear attack rather than on the war itself in an attempt to contextualize the story to the life of the average American. The original script Hume concocted did not have Kansas City being bombed. Instead, he chose only the local air force base as the destination for the Russian bomb with survivors staggering in to the town for help. Instead, the producers at ABC chose to have Kansas City included in the bombing sites with main filming being taken at Lawrence, Kansas. The US Government wanted to make it absolutely clear in the film that the soviets were the instigators for the nuclear exchanges, however the ABC producers were set on making the instigator unclear in the movie in order to not have the audience be focused on taking one side versus the other, but to have the audience focus on the repercussions of the blast. Because of this disagreement, the government did not allow the producers to use stock footage... ... middle of paper ... ...session and possible use of nuclear weapons, Carl Sagan states at this debate, “Imagine a room awash in gasoline, and there are two implacable enemies in that room. One of them has nine thousand matches, the other seven thousand matches. Each of them is concerned about who's ahead, who's stronger." He indicates that no matter the quantity of nuclear warheads, a number often touted in the international realm when comparing relative strengths of each nation, the simple possession of a nuclear warhead can have devastating consequences for world stability. Several politicians who saw the movie claimed it was a massive anti-nuclear campaign. People accused the producers and cast of wanting to disarm the country and leave the United States vulnerable to attack with no retaliation. Historical Significance Themes and Motifs Silence - Desperation - Analytic Conclusion

Open Document