The Crucible Analysis

1152 Words3 Pages

Since 1692 students and adults have learned about the Salem witch trials through the famous play The Crucible by Arthur Lee Miller. Yet, the novel by Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum present the story of the witch trials and Salem in a divergent meaning. History is based on power, yet it is obtained and shown in various ways. The various ways in which power is shown in history were uncovered from the many Salem Village and Salem Town residents over an almost 100-year time span. Three prime examples which are money or inheritance, your name, and who did not like who, will be discussed in the following essay. Lets first look at the example of money or inheritance, which was probably the most influential aspects of the Salem witch trials in …show more content…

The second example is who you were or what last name you had. First, the two wealthiest families in Salem Village were the Putnam Family spoken of earlier and the Porter Family, who seem to have been wealthier than the Putnam’s (Boyer and Nissenbaum 111). Despite the fact that the Porter’s had more money they associated themselves as anti-Parris and helped out behind the scenes or quietly (Boyer and Nissenbaum 115). While the Putnam’s were wealthy but not quite as wealthy as the Porter’s, they were outspoken and “bluff” (Boyer and Nissenbaum 115). The approach of the Putnam’s seemed to work as in 1692 more people related or associated with the Porter’s were accused and more than likely hung as witches (Boyer and Nissenbaum 184). One other way their name played a role was if you were considered an outsider. Outsiders made up eighty-two percent of the total group of accused witches in 1692 (Boyer and Nissenbaum 190). While they usually lived outside the bounds of Salem Village; seventeen lived in Salem Town and sixty-six resided in neighboring towns. The remaining thirty in towns of northwestern Massachusetts (Boyer and Nissenbaum 190). In saying this the outsiders either moved into Salem Village, married someone who was from Salem Village or knew someone in the village while they lived in a neighboring town. Bridget Bishop was hanged on June 10, 1692 as a witch, she was also considered an outsider even …show more content…

Yet, in Salem 1692 this was exactly what they did to the people whom they either disliked or hated. Take Sarah Osborne as an example, she was an outsider from Watertown, Massachusetts, who married a Salem Villager Robert Prince. He later died leaving his land to Osborne and their two sons James and Joseph. Osborne soon married her second husband and former hired hand Alexander Osborne, they both then gained full and permanent legal control of the Prince lands in defiance of her late husband Robert Prince’s will (Boyer and Nissenbaum 194). Thus, cheating the Prince boys of their rightful inheritance. This made the Village view Osborne as an evil person who cheated her own sons. Three years after the death of Sarah Osborne her two sons Joseph and James signed petitions supporting Samuel Parris even after Parris helped bring their mother to death (Boyer and Nissenbaum 194). The last example is of John Proctor, who was a tavern keeper on Ipswich Road and a native of Ipswich, Massachusetts. He came into Salem Village in his thirties when he leased one of the largest farms in the area “Groton”, his interests grew further when he inherited one-third share approximatley 1,200 pounds upon his father’s death (Boyer and Nissenbaum 200). Although he was considered an elite by his prosperity and tavern license, he was never in the eyes of Salem

Open Document