More handpicked essays just for you.
Education system how no child left behind hurts schools
Education system how no child left behind hurts schools
No child left behind to act. who passed it and has it been successful
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As Rodney Paige, former Secretary of Education, said, “We have an educational emergency in the United States of America” (Hursh, 2007). The American ideal of egalitarianism essentially states that individuals should have an equal opportunity to pursue their dreams, and an important part of being able to achieve this is attaining a quality education. Students of differing racial, cultural, socioeconomic, and ability levels should all have the same opportunities in receiving a high-quality education. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is seeking to change this. The NCLB is the current authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Houston, 2007), which was passed during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration. Every five years the ESEA is renewed. It is currently due for renewal in 2014.
In 2001, the ESEA was reissued as the NCLB. It was brought into power to improve the educational outcomes of disadvantaged students by implementing yearly standardized testing in English, Math, and after 2007, in Science as well. It holds states, school boards, schools, and teachers accountable to a higher standard. Students are to be 100% proficient in english and math by 2014. As reported by Laura Chapman, some experts believe that up to 85% of schools will fail to meet the target of being 100% proficient in reading and math by 2014 (2007). States have to meet Adequate Yearly Proficiency (AYP) rates, and if they do not meet these rates for two years in a row, sanctions would start to be applied. Students would be able to choose to leave that school for another school that is meeting their individual AYP rate or to receive free tutoring. In more serious cases, schools that have not m...
... middle of paper ...
...The failed promise of the no child left behind act. Race, Ethnicity and Education,10(3), 295-308. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62050783?accountid=14789
Lee, J., & Reeves, T. (2012). Revisiting the impact of NCLB high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources: State NAEP 1990-2009 reading and math achievement gaps and trends. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 209-231. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1018478080?accountid=14789
Milner, A. R., Sondergeld, T. A., Demir, A., Johnson, C. C., & Czerniak, C. M. (2012). Elementary teachers' beliefs about teaching science and classroom practice: An examination of Pre/Post NCLB testing in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 111-132. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1011395880?accountid=14789
The article “Public School Finance, School Choice, and Equal Educational Opportunity in Texas: The Enduring Importance of Background Conditions” states, “As a result of the Edgewood litigation, state educational expenditures have increased, and today there is more equality of access to instructional resources across Texas school districts than ever before” (Janssen, 2000, pg.2). Another significant impact from the Texas Supreme Court ruling as the Property Tax finance policy unconstitutional in Edgewood ISD v. Kirby was the increased academic scores of students from elementary through middle school in the two subjects English and math. As explained in the article “Tangible Impact of School Finance Litigation” stating, “In both reading and mathematics, the relationship between the scaled scores for both fourth and eighth graders and whether the state had experienced the filing of an adequacy lawsuit was significant. With scores increasing nationally as a function of time, the filing of a lawsuit increases this impact in fourth- and eighth-grade reading and mathematics” (Lockridge,Maiden,2014, pg.17). Along with these result, the article “The Local Impact of School Finance Reform in Texas” explained “Local views on the new finance program varied across the districts in a
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
93). Therefore, accountability became the central focus to improve education in America. Schools and teachers would now be judged or held accountable by their performance, and schools that failed to meet certain standards would be closed; this was a basic principle in the business sector (Ravitch, 2011, p. 8). Furthermore, NCLB mandated that every school must be 100 percent proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014; consequently schools that failed to perform would suffer punitive consequences. However, by 2007, the evidence was becoming clear that the mandates of the new law were not increasing student achievement in learning. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the federal testing program reported that only one-third of students met the federal standard for proficiency (Ravitch, 2011, p. 103). Ravitch argued that 100 percent proficiency in reading and mathematics was unattainable by the projected year. Not only did the law allow for each
Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.
The policy “No Child Left Behind (NCLB)” is a policy where Federal legislation has mandated that children be tested, and where there is compliance with standards. Simply means, that all children must meet standards. The standards are defined by the states, and all children will be subject to testing, starting from as early as third grade. The students will be tested annually, in order to ensure that they are getting the type of education that they are entitled to, as determined by their performance on standardized tests.
America demands that all youth receive an education and that its educational system is free and open to all—regardless of class, race, ethnicity, age, and gender. However, the system is failing. There is still inequality in the educational system, and minorities’ experience with education is shaped by discrimination and limited access, while white people’s experience with education is shaped by privilege and access. The educational experience for minorities is still segregated and unequal. This is because the number of white children that are withdrawn from school by their parents is higher than the number of people of color enrolling. White parents are unconsciously practicing the idea of “blockbusting,” where minorities begin to fill up a school; whites transfer their children to a school that has a small or no minority population. They unconsciously feel like once their child is in a school full of minorities that school would not get the proper funding from the federal government. Bonilla-Silvia (2001) states that “[i]nner-city minority schools, in sharp contrast to white suburban schools, lack decent buildings, are over-crowded, [and] have outdated equipment…” (97). The “No Child Left Behind” Act, which holds schools accountable for the progress of their students, measures students’ performance on standardized tests. Most white children that are in suburban schools are given the opportunity to experience education in a beneficial way; they have more access to technology, better teachers, and a safe environment for learning. Hence, white students’ experience with the education system is a positive one that provides knowledge and a path to success. Also, if their standardized testing is low, the government would give the school...
NAEP is part of the U.S. Department of Education, and is central to any discussion of whether American students and the public schools they attend are doing well or badly. (Ravitch, Reign of Error, chapter 5, p44) Test scores are not the only way to measure education, but also to the extent that they matter and improve. The NCLB is gone now and the Common Core instead, because there are many disadvantages. For example, the result was disappointing, schools’ foundation was lacking and schools neglected students’ personality and accountability, leaving millions of children behind and did not eliminate poverty or close the achievement gap.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is currently the educational policy in the United States. Prior to NCLB the educational policies in effect were “A Nation at Risk, in 1987 America 2000, and a few years later with Goals 2000” (Eisner, 2001, p.21). No Child Left Behind is a test based accountability system used in schools to measure their performance holding the districts, administrators and teachers liable and accountable for the outcomes. Supovitz (2009) States that No Child Left Behind was a major reform initiative intended to bring about widespread improvements in student performance and reduce inequities between ethnic groups and other traditionally under-served populations like economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial
Rudalevige, A. (2003). The politics of No Child Left Behind. EducationNext, 3(4), 63-69. Retrieved from EducationNext: http://educationnext.org/the-politics-of-no-child-left-behind/
Since the No Child Left Behind Act, also known as NCLB, has come into effect, it has caused some concerns with teachers and parents alike on how well it is working for the students. There have been issues that have arisen that needed to be addressed and instead been overlooked when a child does not meet with the school’s standardized testing and is pushed onto the next grade level.
Maleyko, Glenn, and Marytza A. Gawlik. "No Child Left Behind: What We Know And What We Need To Know." Education 131.3 (2011): 600-624. Academic Search Elite. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
This required each state to develop a set of standards that each child would need to know in math and reading. The NCLB also required almost all of the students to be tested annually throughout elementary and middle school grades (Webb, Metha, Jordan 2013). The act also strived that all students would test at a proficient level by 2014. The impact of this decision was that the government would be more involved than ever before in how a school taught, what the school taught, and the requirements of outcomes. The downside impact of this was that states changed the proficiency levels over the years and there has been inconsistent data given when reported. In a report with control groups it is shown that there were changes before and after implementation of the NCLB (Ladd 2010). With that information one could conclude that the act was successful and should be further pursued along with
“Making the Grade,” which was published in the Salt Lake Tribune in September of this year, is an article arguing the negative sides of the No Child Left Behind Act. Through this article, a majority of the discussion regarded the budgeting involved with NCLB. This article calls No Child Left Behind a “one-size-fits-all formula for improving education in America” (Making the Grade). According to President Bush, the NCLB Act is “’the cornerstone’ of his administration” (Salt Lake Tribune). Like with any legislation, however, come both positive and negative sides.
United States Commission on Civil Rights. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: The impact of standards-based education reform on student performance. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
The achievement gap is greatly evident and impacts the low-income, minority students the most. Although the federal government attempted to resolve this problem with No Child Left Behind, the social problem is still evident. As there is still much pressure on standardized tests and annual reports, reformation is needed. No Child Left Behind has proven to be inadequate and rather highlights the urgency for education reform. Although the act is called “No Child Left Behind,” an appropriate title would have been “Education Left Behind.” More than focusing on test scores, education should prepare students in how to contribute to