Critical Analysis Of Leadership In An Organized Anarchy

1778 Words4 Pages

Critical Analysis of Leadership in an Organized Anarchy In the world of higher education, we as students who have chosen this profession strive to one day possibly becoming a President of an institution. In the article written by Michael D. Cohen and James G. March, “Leadership in an Organized Anarchy” the authors detail their beliefs that most college presidents face four fundamental ambiguities which strike at the heart of a president’s interpretation of leadership. The four ambiguities are ambiguity of purpose, power, experience, and success. But is Cohen’s and March’s concept true for every president and their institution? To determine this I have decided to compare them to the current leadership of 16th president of the University of North Texas (UNT), Dr. Neal Smatresk.
Ambiguity of purpose is stated as normative statements …show more content…

I know based on coursework that all can be assessed (measured) to determine whether or not they are being obtained through the use of questionnaires, surveys, statistical data complied through different departmental resources across the campus, analyzed by the Office of Data Analytics and Institutional Research. Additional methods of assessment can come from outside organizations such as the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB); and other state and federal governmental agencies. Unfortunately, each of the goals can be problematic for the institution and do have the possibility of failure. Failure of achieving one’s objectives can cost an institution its perceived honor and prestige, could cause lower enrollment and most importantly loss of financial resources. As a graduate student, I researched several institutions that had prestigious higher education programs, teaching faculty, and research opportunities before making my final decision on where to

Open Document