A Doll's House Critical Analysis

1695 Words4 Pages

Gaining the Right to Liberty and Freedom
The right to act on one’s free will is the most basic of human necessities. To have that right disregarded is to take away a fundamental part of human individualism. “A Doll’s House”, Nora living in the constraints of a 19th century Victorian society has been refused the right to equality and free will. As expected of a woman she is not to have freedom to make her own decisions, she is expected to stay home, care for children and tend to her husbands needs, as well as to have no individual opinion (Mapaulita). Henrik Ibsen however has exploited literary devices throughout the play to accentuate how Nora’s role in society has changed and how her husband Torvald and Dr. Rank among other characters have …show more content…

The character’s lines are not embellished as Shakespearian literature commonly is. As a result the reader can relate to the characters, and reinforces that this play is true to how society was and that any further presented norms are not out of the ordinary. Mrs. Linde tells Nils “[he] must not forget that [she] had a helpless mother and two little brother. [They] couldn’t wait for [him]…[his] prospects seemed hopeless then” (Ibsen 50). Mrs. Linde married for money because in a typical Victorian society a woman could not provide for her family as it was the mans job. Nils did not have a job and thus Mrs. Linde chose her now-dead husband. The reader is inclined to believe that “working and earning money…was like being a man” (14). Using straightforward language, Ibsen outlined the constricted social norm of the Victorian …show more content…

Rank, who is portrayed as a seemingly unimportant character, is to reveal aspects of characters and foreshadow events in the book that lead Nora to create an identity for herself. Through revealing aspects of character Ibsen establishes him as a trustworthy character. Since he knows of things he reveals and the characters trust him, the reader is inclined to trust him as well. Dr. Rank reveals that Torvald is superficial when he tells Nora that he does not want him at his wake because “[Torvald’s] refined nature gives him an unconquerable disgust at everything that is ugly” (32). Torvald does not look at things beyond the surface, meaning that if Torvald were to see Dr. Rank at his death he would be disgusted. He would no longer see Dr. Rank as his closest friend but as an “ugly” memory, which has since passed. The revelation that Torvald is superficial connects him to the stereotypical man of the Victorian era where a man’s primary ambition was to keep up his appearance. Part of this appearance was Nora, thus “he used to seem almost jealous if [she] mentioned any of the dear folk at home, so naturally [she] gave up doing so” (32). Torvald is possessive of Nora, and even though she does not pointedly see his controlling nature she notices it submissively. Dr. Rank not only reveals Torvalds superficiality however nonetheless causes Nora to reveal his controlling nature and further label him as a man of the Victorian era. However Nora would “often talk

Open Document