Being accused of a criminal offense is a serious matter. The types of crimes that fall under this category vary widely and carry a range of punishments from community service to a prison term. When a person is convicted of a criminal offense, it becomes part of their record. Even after they serve out their sentence, the crime can haunt them for the rest of their life. It may impact their ability to get a job or find a place to live. They may carry the stigma of the crime with them wherever they go.
Many criminal offenses are labeled as state crimes, meaning they are tried in a state court. These crimes fall into several categories. For instance, a crime against a person can include assault & battery, criminal domestic violence, kidnapping, attempted murder, and murder or manslaughter. There are also crimes against property, which includes burglary, arson, shoplifting, bank fraud and more.
Sex crimes is a serious category, which can impact your life in many ways. A person convicted of one of these crimes may be listed on the state registry of sex offenders, which will limit the kinds of jobs they can obtain and where they are allowed to live, as well as where they can go and what they can do. Charges under this category can range from criminal sexual conduct and criminal solicitation of a minor to indecent exposure.
Another type of criminal offense is with drugs, traffic violations and firearms crimes. The crimes that fall under this category vary widely. Drug-related crimes include DUI/DWI, trafficking or possession with the intent of distribution of illegal substances or prescription medications. Alcohol is viewed as a drug for criminal purposes.
In general, these charges start out with ...
... middle of paper ...
If a person claims they didn’t commit the crime for which they are accused, the defense attorney will work to establish reasonable doubt as to the charge. They may also have an alibi which the attorney will use to prove that committing the crime at the stated time would have been impossible.
For those who use the second plea, they did it but aren’t responsible, they have several options at defense. They may claim self-defense, insanity or entrapment. In these cases, the defendant must be able to prove their reason for defense.
If you have been charged with a criminal offense and need representation, it is important to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney in South Carolina. If you have questions or would like to schedule a consultation, contact Powers McCartan PLLC Attorneys At Law. Powers McCartan PLLC offers free consultations for DWI/DUI offenses.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Insanity. When some people think of the word “insanity”, television shows comparable to Law and Order and NCIS may come into mind. Due to some of these shows, one may not fully comprehend what is insanity. In this paper I will discuss what insanity, a brief history of insanity and how it impacts today’s society, furthermore, I will also discuss my personal thoughts on the subject. What is the insanity defense exactly. The insanity defense can be defined as “A defense asserted by an accused in a criminal prosecution to avoid liability for the commission of a crime, whereas at the time of the crime, the person did not appreciate the nature, quality, or wrongdoing of the acts.” In order to und... [tags: Insanity defense, Mental disorder, Crime]
1008 words (2.9 pages)
Case Analysis : ' The Defense Of Law Enforcement Should Not Manufacture Crime But Prevent It From Occurring?
- The main factor that exemplifies entrapment in this case is the persistence. As mentioned earlier, it was shown in Mr. Jacobson’s defense that the government’s surveys and mailings continued on for over two years, often without response. Referring back to Sherman v. U.S the court had stated that law enforcement should not manufacture crime but prevent it from occurring. This exemplifies the root of the controversy. Hypothetically, what if the government did not make Mr. Jacobson a target of their sting operation.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States, United States]
910 words (2.6 pages)
- "Insanity is defined as a mental disorder of such severity as to render its victim incapable of managing his affairs or conforming to social standards." (Insanity, pg. 1) It is used in court to state that the defendant was not aware of what he/she was doing at the time of the crime, due to mental illnesses. But insanity is a legal, not a medical, definition. There is a difference between mental illness and going insane. Many problems are raised by the existence of the insanity defense.... [tags: Papers]
1470 words (4.2 pages)
- As goes the famous ‘golden thread’ speech given by Viscount Sankey in Woolmington v DPP ; “No matter what the charge or where the trial, the principle that the prosecution must prove the guilt of the prisoner is part of the common law of England and no attempt to whittle it down can be entertained.” In simpler terms, the general rule above is that the prosecution carries a legal burden to prove the elements of the offence and that the accused only need to raise a defense on a burden that is merely evidential.... [tags: legal, insanity, statutory, offense]
2677 words (7.6 pages)
- One of the biggest debates in the judicial system of the United States in recent years is the cases that involve mentally ill offenders. The big debate is whether or not to give these offenders treatment rather than jail time or jail time instead of receiving treatment. Mental health is extremely valuable, as is physical and social health to complete a plethora of aspects that fulfill one’s health. It can be said that all three are just as important as the next, however mental health may exhibit more serious consequences and repercussions if left untreated.... [tags: Insanity defense, Mental disorder, Psychiatry]
1080 words (3.1 pages)
- The framers formed this country with one sole document, the Constitution, which they wrote with great wisdom and foresight. This bountiful wisdom arose from the unjust treatment of King George to which the colonists were subject. Among these violations of the colonists' rights were inequitable trials that made a mockery of justice. As a result, a fair trial of the accused was a right given to the citizens along with other equities that the framers instilled in every other facet of this country's government.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
1994 words (5.7 pages)
- If a person being accused of a crime has a legitimate reason for committing the act then justification can be used as a defense in a prosecution for a criminal offense. A person is not criminally liable when their offense is justified. Examples of justification defenses include self-defense, defense of others, defense of necessity, and mistake of fact. Justification defenses are fact-driven that require the jury to decide whether the defendant 's actions were (Davenport, p 244) Self-defense A legitimate defense for the use of force to protect oneself from imminent bodily hand or death at the hands of an aggressor is self-defense.... [tags: Crime, Criminal law, Law, Criminal defenses]
1192 words (3.4 pages)
- Law Enforcement and the Rights of the Accused Law Enforcement and the Rights of the Accused In this paper, I will discuss Amendments VI, V, VI and VIII which give rights to the accused. I will also examine how these rights affect law enforcement procedures. I will then give details on which law enforcement agencies each amendment affects and how. Amendment VI gives the people the right against unreasonable search and seizure. It also states that a warrant has to be signed by a judge and cannot be issued without probably cause.... [tags: Law Enforcement]
1434 words (4.1 pages)
- Gary Leon Ridgway may not be a household name, but the infamous Green River Killer is one of the most accomplished serial murderers in U.S. history. In 2003, Ridgway confessed 48 accounts of aggravated first degree murder (more confirmed murders than any other American serial killer) during a two-and-a-half-year period in the early 1980s near Seattle, although it is believed he slaughtered even more. The majority of his victims were runaway teenage girls and hookers whom he picked up on the interstate and strangled to death.... [tags: Law]
2374 words (6.8 pages)
- From a trial strategy point of view, you always start with the piece(s) of evidence you believe are most damaging to the client's case and work backwards looking for an exploitable flaw in the search and seizure procedure that would make that or those item(s) inadmissible. The further back in the series of events you can argue a fatal flaw, the more likely that the evidence and any additional materials which flowed from that particular item of evidence will be excluded. This is the practical analysis of all the times we see or hear of law enforcement arguing that there was some technical item which drew their attention and suspicion and justifies their hunch that criminal activity is afoot... [tags: U.S. Law]
2001 words (5.7 pages)