Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
case analysis and problem solving
a case conceptualization discussion
case analysis and problem solving
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: case analysis and problem solving
In a world filled with criminal shows on television, it is difficult to get an accurate idea of what it truly means to be a police officer or a detective. It seems easier to absorb the analysis they present and simultaneously solve the case; however, is that truly how it works? Criminal Minds is one of the most popular shows on television today. This is due to the way it portrays the FBI in their endless search for villains unfound and rampant. Law and Order portrays the entire process of find, justifying, and incriminating offenders. Another show similar to Law and order is 24. 24 goes through an entire day in one, twenty-four episode, season. It does this in great detail to show the audience how they arrived at conclusion of who was guilty. …show more content…
Criminal minds is the guiltiest of this type of exaggeration. The team of six occasionally seven individuals seem to be the only ones at the crime scene; again, in reality, There are anywhere between three to ten crime scene investigators. A few here and there for DNA, a few to take photos that encapsulate the crime scene, and a few to investigate the surrounding area and get witness …show more content…
Each new episode features a new murderer or a new serial criminal committing a different crime. It is simply unrealistic to believe that the team encounters a different case in every episode. Although it seems blatantly obvious now, thousands of viewers swallow the false information released by the show. The team flies out to a city and quickly begins its work trying to figure out who the criminal might be. They do their best to create a sort of “profile” for each new criminal, which includes an age, a height, a weight, and a personality type. They use the help of the public, to find and identify potential suspects. This in turn, engages the audience in the
This type of criminal profiling is quick, accurate, and easy. But, it is the opposite in real life. People in today’s society believe that actual crime solving is as easy as it is in Hollywood while in reality it takes weeks, maybe even months, for criminal profilers to narrow the suspects down to one person. On reality shows, every case is solved within the forty-five plus minutes of every episode. These unrealistic events set people up for a lot of confusion. These shows don’t go into much detail on how they solve these crimes and catch the “bad guys” you just know that they put some papers in machines and somehow have a database containing the faces of hundreds to thousands of people. This type of database does not even exist yet. Though progress is being made, there is no piece of machinery that can pinpoint the face of any person of your choosing. So, knowing this, it seems quite difficult to grasp the thought that these crime shows would ever be able to get any actual work done because without these “machines” that they use on their shows, they would be unable to catch their “guy” as quickly and easily as they do. Therefore, criminal profiling would be known as a boring and dragging event that most people would not be interested in were it not for the exaggerations applied to the processes that occur in the “crime-fighting, inspired countless movies, television shows, and best-selling thrillers.” Our reality is distorted by the media, causing people to believe some of the craziest things. Along with over-exaggerating reality, society has set standards and stereotypes that many people
..., such as rape and domestic abuse as well as cases involving children and the elderly. The cops and prosecutors on this show are purposefully shown to be very competent as to emphasize their ability to do their job correctly. The characters on this show are efficient and are shown to be the best ‘guy’ for the job.
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation was introduced to viewers in October 2000. Since that time, the franchise has added two versions in major metropolitan areas, now addressing crime scenarios in Las Vegas, Miami and New York City. Based on the most recent Nielsen ratings for primetime television shows, the CSI franchise claimed approximately 35 million viewers during the 2010 – 2011 viewing season. The popularity of forensic science drama on television has led officers of the court to voice opinions that there is a “CSI effect” which alters the juror pools and outcomes of criminal trial proceedings. The differences between made for television fiction and actual crime solving are many and when jurors consider themselves pseudo-experts those lines may get blurred in the courtroom.
Specifically, crime shows have given us, the TV audience as a whole, scripts or an expectation of what will/should happen in a variety of situations. It leads people to think about what is appropriate and what isn’t in terms of how the results of these situations play out. For example, in the CSI franchise, as the plot unfolds in each episode, it takes forensic evidence, such as DNA or fingerprints, to convict the villain. Before the technological breakthroughs made in the fields of biology and forensics, juries relied more on circumstantial evidence, and eyewitness accounts to prove someone was guilty. This is just one example of how crime shows have changed the general representations of what is the “correct” way to solve a crime.
Schweitzer, N. J., and Michael J. Saks. "The CSI Effect: Popular Fiction About Forensic Science
The idea of a detective catching an elusive convict or solving an improbable crime has been prevalent in all corners of the world, spread throughout many cultures and societies. The detective genre is held as the idea that an individual has to solve a crime. This detective usually has nothing to gain from solving the crime, but they see it more as an obstacle. The detective doesn’t always take every case, as human beings, we are too often curious of the impossible; our natural instinct is to question why and how things work in this world. People crave mystery, to taste a bit of improbable, to see what the detectives see, to see what is overlooked by many. The idea of an intelligent witty, sharp “sleuth” with an obedient sidekick has been prevalent
...ase that they have been assigned. Their loyalty to the case gives the impression that they are going to seek justice the right way. Their competence to the case gives the impression to the public that they are knowledgeable and diligent to the duties that they have been assigned and that they take their job very seriously. The show demonstrates that the police have a whole lot of integrity. They give the facts and only the facts. They do not give their opinions in these cases and they do not treat them in a personal nature. They will not lie to get what they want. All of these characteristics have an impact on the public, because the public will not trust an officer with information if he or she does not possess these characteristics.
I began this year considering a career in forensics. After delving into the field in detail however, I see that it is a very delicate science and easily open to misinterpretation. There are many variables within forensics, the first and foremost being that of the CSI effect and how it influences our expectations of the capabilities of forensic science. While it's true that great advances have been made in the area of forensic science, it's unrealistic to expect a crime scene to be processed, evidence analyzed and a conclusive forensics report to be completed in a short time and be completely accurate 100% of the time. Forensic science has a lot of room for improvement, and understanding if, how, and why shows like CSI affect the field is of high priority. After all, this is real life and not a TV show.
The Criminal Justice System is made up of several different process law enforcement, judiciary, and corrections this system is where the accused individual are tried and punished for the crime they are charged with. The depiction of criminal justice system in throughout each process (police, courts, and correctional) has become ubiquitous on television today. Shows that give a visual of the arresting and investigation process (law enforcement) are the televisions shows “Cops” and “The First 48 Hours”. The show “Cops” is a television series that follows police officers, constables and sheriff deputies around during their patrol and other policing activity (Cops, n.d). Showing the officer enforcing the laws of the land, apprehend offenders, reducing and prevent crimes, maintain public order, provide emergency and related community services and more” (Schmalleger F., 2014). The “Cops” show conveys the initial stage of the law enforcement. The images or positive (in my opinion) when it comes to showing the actual community services the law enforcers provide. This allow police to become more integrated in to the communities. Reducing the amount of fear toward the particular criminal justice profession. It has change the outlook on policing in the communities and enhances the level of trust from the communities for law enforcement. This allows for a sufficient reduction and prevent crimes when law enforcement and the people of the community come together. “The First 48 Hour” is a show that shows the criminal justice process from the crime, arrest, to the investigation stages in the criminal justice process. This show follows detectives around from the state of their investigation (right after a crime occurs...
Generally, crime and law enforcement television programs have been tremendously popular, with constantly elevated ratings over time. More than a quarter of all prime time shows from the 1960s to the 1990s have centred on subjects of crime or criminal justice, which comprise the biggest single subject matter on television today, across all types of programming (Weigel and Jessor, 1999). Drawing on Carlson's (2001) review of the literature, we observe that these studies have characteristically enclosed five main interconnected areas: knowledge of and information on the system, compliance, rights, police images, and violence and victimization. Every substantive part listed above can offer guidance in expanding a complete research program centring on television imagery and public insights of the criminal justice system.
Most of the nation receives their information on law enforcement from television. That’s why I knew the Maranda rights by heart before I was even 12. Law and Order, Criminal Minds, NCIS, and shows similar to this are why some even enter into the law enforcement field they want to be like the famous profilers that solve cases in one hour plus commercials.
Tyler, Tom R. “Viewing CSI and the Threshold of Guilt: Managing truth and Justice in Reality
Crime fighting is incredibly time consuming and can be immensely complicated. As I mentioned before, shows will often lead the viewer on to think that one person does all the work at a crime scene. In reality, the process goes more along these lines: When a call is made that needs assistance, a uniformed officer will be the first one on scene. He will do his job of securing the area and making sure any other threats have been neutralized. If he needs, he will call for detectives to come and investigate as well as interview any witnesses in the area. Shortly thereafter, crime scene units will show up and help in recovering physical evidence such as prints or traces of DNA. Following all of these different units and people arriving, the scene and evidence needs to be photographed, documented, and chronicled. Every single member of the team will record his or her own take on the scene by filling out paperwork (Fact vs. Fiction). The bottom line here is that television is
A juror who has no experience with or background knowledge on the subject of forensic science is a rarity in this day and age. In 2006, 70 million people watched one of the three versions of CSI in one week and 30 million watched the original CSI in one night (Shelton). Thanks to these popular television shows people are beginning to think they have certain knowledge about the way a case should be investigated and what scientific evidence needs to be provided in court. The worst thing about the CSI Effect is that “jurors think they have a thorough understanding ...
I am highly interested in the show because upon the start of the episode I am sitting on the edge of my seat trying to figure out the offender and how the offender is going to kill the victim(s). Many of my friends tease me because I am incapable to handle the sight of blood, yet alone the sight of a dead body, but I am captive in attempting to understand what drives in offender to commit crimes. I believe that I am captive by this crime drama because of the interrogations that happens upon finding the Unknown Subjects. I am someone aspiring to become a lawyer, and I am intrigued to watch public servants either follow proper protocol or use the any means necessary tactic. For example in Season 1, a police officer had a federal undercover police officer as a friend. This police officer almost risked his career as a public servant to turn off the cameras in the interrogation room, and assault the offender to receive information about the location of his federal undercover police officer. In my opinion, Criminal Minds always grabs my undivided attention because I am able to learn the importance of respect to jurisdiction. Simply meaning that I am learning that public servants do not appreciate the higher authority coming in and calling