Judges preside over criminal and non-criminal proceeding as an impartial party to the evidence and arguments presented by the defense and prosecuting attorneys. His or her role as a judge in a jury trial is to act as a mediator between the defense and prosecution ensuring proper court room procedures are being followed to guarantee that a fair trial is administered. Judges are charged with hearing testimony, arguments and viewing evidence determining what is strong enough to support proof beyond reasonable doubt and passes judgment of guilt or innocents based on facts presented (Judges Role in Court, n.d.). Similarly, juries will take on the judge’s role in a trial by jury to determine proof beyond reasonable doubt of prove guilt or innocents. Judges in any case can remove testimony, statements or evidence from any portion of the trial if he or she feels it to be not in accordance procedure, not pertinent, bias, corrupt or weak. Last, once a defendant is convicted the judge determines a sentence and/or imposes fines that fit the crime committed. Judges are usually limited on how much or how little fines, probation or incarceration is imposed on a convicted individual based on state law and the crime itself. However, judges can agree to lesser sentencing if the defense council presents a sentencing plea or if the judge determines a lesser sentence is warranted based on the facts in the case (Role of the Judge, n.d.). The role of a judge in a trial is important to ensure the defendant r...
... middle of paper ...
... the end the judge made the correct decision in allowing the death penalty to be an option based on what he believed to be. The article portrays the judge as a neutral party that made a decision based on evidence and not hearsay (Kiefer, 2015).
After looking at the different roles and how the media portray each I find myself best suited as a defense attorney. Although I have no real desire to work in the court system I find it gratify to attempt of actually bring justice to victims. I find it outside my moral code to defend someone who appears clearly guilt of a crime. Being a judge would also be hard because it is up to him or she to decide what evidence is admissible in court even if he know it would prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of a defendant. Especially if the police or prosecution was the main reason evidence was not admissible.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- To begin with, as I entered the court room I observed seven long rows of benches, a table at the front with chairs, the judge’s bench and two televisions beside it and a substantial table in front of the judge with microphones. Also, I detected matters which I wasn’t aware of, such as a sheriff being there, sitting at a table with a computer and telephone, and beside the sheriff a small room that was transparent containing a mic instead. After the judge’s arrival, the hearings began, the lawyer for the first case was not present therefore, the Crown inquired the sheriff regarding what to do.... [tags: Judge, Court, Lawyer, Bench]
703 words (2 pages)
- The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute.... [tags: criminal court, defendant, witness]
3274 words (9.4 pages)
- Ever since the start of using courts, the main goal of it was to deliver a fair environment where the accused could defend themselves and show the jurors that he/ she did not commit the crime that they were accused of. Sometimes this system fails us and they sentence an innocent man to jail for something they didn’t commit. The activity that I observed in the field of criminal justice was I went to the boulder court house and watched one of the cases that’s was happening that day. As I sat there watching I saw the defendant’s lawyer trying to convince the jurors that his client was innocent, I thought to myself: how can we improve the court room.... [tags: Judge, Jury, Court]
1860 words (5.3 pages)
- The idea of having a criminal law, procedure and a proper court system has been a concern and must in the United States since it was first founded. This concept is always under consistent speculation and undergoes changes almost every year. One of the most influential pieces included into the procedure of criminal law and the court system is the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was created by the representatives of America to not only enforce the idea of substantive law, but also create a framework for the rights of every day Americans.... [tags: criminal justice system, bill of rights]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- I went into Judge Lippit’s court room and there was no one there but the court reporter and the clerk and so I got my chance to act was was the verdict on the collision case that I had observed the most and she said the jury rule on the plaintiff’s side with 144 thousand dollars but that she really wanted more close to 200 thousand dollars. A new trial was about to start, but jurors haven’t even been selected so they were just discussing exhibits. There are three attorneys in the defense counsel and one for the plaintiff.... [tags: Law, Jury, Damages, Lawyer]
1194 words (3.4 pages)
- The Supreme Court, which sees almost 150 petitions per week, called cert petitions, must carefully select the cases that they want to spend their time and effort on (Savage 981). If they didn’t select them carefully, the nine justices would quickly be overrun, so they have put in place a program to weed through the court cases to pick out the small number they will discuss. There are a few criteria that are used to judge whether or not a case will be tried. The first is whether or not the lower courts decided the case based on another one of the Supreme Court’s decisions for they will investigate these in order to withhold or draw back their conclusion that they made in their court case.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
2261 words (6.5 pages)
- On October 6th, 2016 I attended Queens Small Claims Court. It was on a Thursday night where I was able to be act as an observer and listen to a small claims dispute. A small claims dispute is a legal court of law in order to solve cases with small amounts of money in a short amount of time. I attended this court proceeding with approximately 20 other classmates. This dispute lasted an hour and thirty minutes long. The first thing that took place as I entered Queens Small Claims Court was there strict security.... [tags: Plaintiff, Court, Lawyer, Pleading]
860 words (2.5 pages)
- This was a directions hearing before a judge of the District Court in a civil matter. The plaintiff was Dylan Siddle and the absent defendant was Wai Fong Lau. The plaintiff announced his appearance and his intention to seek a court order for substituted or informal service. Siddle spelt his name for the Court transcript and cited his right to do so under r 10.14 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) (“UCPR”). Siddle addressed the magistrate. The plaintiff explained the general nature of the case and gave a chronology of unsuccessful personal service.... [tags: Civil procedure, Lawsuit, Complaint]
714 words (2 pages)
- Ms. Bouvia immediately appealed the decision of the trial court, which was summarily heard by the California Appellate court. She then filed a peremptory writ of mandate seeking the removal of the nasogastric tube inserted against her will without consent by physicians. The peremptory writ of mandate is a formal written command from a court of superior jurisdiction to the lower court to change the order or the decision of the lower court. The Court of appeals of California ordered the trial court to enter new order to grant Bouvia’s request for the “(1) removal of the nasogastric tube from her body, (2) prohibiting any and all of the real parties in interest from replacing or aiding in repl... [tags: Appeal, Law, Trial court, Medicine]
1448 words (4.1 pages)
- Procedures of American Criminal Trial One of the most vaguely understood events in the United States is the modern criminal trial. Most people have a faint knowledge of the goings-on of criminal proceedings, mainly due to what is seen on television, but the person who knows the real course of a trial is rare. However, there is nothing mysterious about the events that determine criminal guilt. Trials are carefully orchestrated, following procedures that have been laid in legal concrete over the years, and generally follow the same basic format across the United States.... [tags: Law Trials Court Essays]
2653 words (7.6 pages)