Throughout much of the short time that humankind has spent on this planet, few questions have been raised and torn apart as often as that regarding the existence of God. Philosophers throughout the ages have tackled this monumental issue, and some of them have gone so far as to try to prove the existence of God from a logical standpoint. Arguments for and against the existence of a Creator abound, but two of these stand above the rest. The first of these is the cosmological argument which while arguable, is unfortunately not entirely disprovable. Easier to argue against is the teleological argument, which actually can be broken down so quickly that one begins to question why it ever became popular in the first place. While neither one of these is guaranteed to convince a dedicated non believer, their interest as philosophical arguments is unquestionable.
In the Western tradition of philosophy, the cosmological argument can be traced all the way back to Plato’s Laws. However, its first appearance as a fully formed argument appears in the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Thomas Aquinas was a Roman Catholic philosopher who lived in the thirteenth century, and had a phenomenal effect on Western philosophy. In his writings, he came to what he believed to be a basic proof for the existence of God. In summary, the argument stands as such: All things that exist must have beginning, and therefore a cause. The Universe as a thing which exists, must have had a beginning and therefore a cause. A dumbed down version of this is simply that no matter how far one chooses to go back, even before the Big Bang, the Universe had to have started at some point, so something had to coax it into existence. Supporters of the cosmological argument ...
... middle of paper ...
...od strong against the test of time.
The cosmological argument for the existence of God is fundamentally flawed, but impossible to disprove by nature. The teleological argument for the existence of God is actually somewhat clever, but easily disprovable. Ultimately, neither philosophy nor science can ever definitively state whether or not God exists. God, if real, exists outside of the realm of what science can measure. Philosophy, while useful in the never-ending debate regarding the great possible being in the sky, is too speculative and this cannot be tested. Arguments for and against God’s existence have been around for a very long time and will likely be around either until God himself makes an appearance, or until the human race dies out. It is not our place to know whether or not there is some higher creative being than us, and personally I am okay with that.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In H. J. McCloskey’s On Being an Atheist article, he argues against two philological design arguments: the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. He also discusses his views on theists’ faith, the existence of evil, and free will. McCloskey states in his article that theists’ views on atheists are wrong. This statement I found out was true after reading his entire article. My previous view was that atheists did not care about following rules or being moral. I also believed that they are bad people.... [tags: God, Theology, Teleological argument]
1813 words (5.2 pages)
- ... If someone were to accept this as a conclusion to accepting God, they would only want to know more. This is only a tiny piece that allows us just a glimpse of God's knowledge. Let’s take a look at the McCloskey’s second argument, the teleological argument. In the teleological argument, McCloskey argues “to get proof going genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed” (McCloskey, 1968). McCloskey is basically stating in his argument that all examples must be indisputable, or they have no ground to stand on.... [tags: cosmological, teleological, evil]
1272 words (3.6 pages)
- Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, as propounded by Thomas Aquinas, is also known as the Third Way. It is the Third of Five ways in Aquinas's masterpiece, "The Summa" (The Five Ways). The five ways are: the unmoved mover, the uncaused causer, possibility and necessity, goodness, truth and nobility and the last way the teleological. The first three ‘ways’ are different variations of the cosmological argument. The Cosmological argument is developed around a distinction between that which has necessary existence and that, which is contingent.... [tags: Papers]
1633 words (4.7 pages)
- Proof For the Existence of God From the diversity of men and creatures on this earth, there has always been one unifying link. At the root of humanity’s existence, lies the root of all things natural and infinite, a hint of something supreme and purposeful, something incomprehensible; a glimpse of what is real and what is possible. Inspired by wonder one can easily be surprised by the doubts presented as to the existence and identity of this driving force. The Law of Causality properly states, “Anything which begins to exist must have been brought into existence by something distinct from itself.” Therefore, only something outside of the world could have created the world.... [tags: cosmological argument, casuality]
1352 words (3.9 pages)
- The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument Aquinas’s argument was as follows: If the universe was infinite, it would have an infinite number of days. The end of an infinite series of days can never be reached, so today would never arrive. However, today has arrived, so the past cannot be infinite. Time began when the universe began, which was an event. Events are caused; therefore there must have been a first cause. This first cause was God. Tennant said there are things in the world which are contingent.... [tags: Papers]
578 words (1.7 pages)
- Among the three arguments to prove God's existence, I find Aquinas's cosmological argument well-grounded in empirical evidence, and that the focus on simple facts proves acceptable in both historical and scientific dimensions. Aquinas starts by stating the preliminary matter that God's existence is not self-evident, and therefore we need to examine God's effects, which we are able to observe, to prove God's existence, although we are not able to understand God's nature perfectly. Aquinas provides five ways demonstrate the existence of a transcendent being through empirical evidence.... [tags: Existence of God]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- ... McCloskey claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-prefect, uncaused cause.” The argument does not state there is a God, but it makes a claim that something caused everything to come into existence. The view of a theist is that there is a God and this argument gives “key elements of the theistic conception of God” (1982, 59). With the conclusion of this argument, many views of God can be determined. “If someone accepts the conclusion, the proper attitude for him to adopt is surely a desire to learn more about God” (ibid, 59).... [tags: cosmological, evils, beliefs]
1263 words (3.6 pages)
- The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and ever since been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters was Leibniz. The cosmological argument is basically an argument about causation. Its major supporter was Thomas Aquinas though Gotfried Leibniz also put forward a simplified version of Aquinas's cosmological argument. The major critics of the argument have included David Hume and Bertrand Russell who question the basic principle that the argument works from.... [tags: Theology, Philosophy]
817 words (2.3 pages)
- Arguments for Existance of God I have chosen the Christian religion to examine in this particular piece of coursework. Over the centuries philosophers and theologians have put forward a number of different arguments to argue the existence of God. The particular arguments I will be looking at are the Teleological Argument and the Cosmological Argument. ==================================================================== William Paley put the Teleological argument forward.... [tags: Papers Religion Christianity Creation Essays]
2748 words (7.9 pages)
- Varying Arguments for the Existence of God Many philosophers and theologians have provided varying arguments for the existence of God. These arguments are either a priori, understood independent of worldly experience and observation (Ontological Argument), or a posteriori, dependent on experience and based on observations of how the world is (Cosmological and Teleological Arguments). This paper will focus on the Cosmological Argument, and show that its underlying principle, the Principle of Sufficient Reason, fails to establish it as a sound argument for the existence of God.... [tags: Papers]
850 words (2.4 pages)
- The Chilean Mine Accident: What Happened
- The Evolution of Creationism
- British Gardening
- Leader-Member Exchange and Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis Assignment one for Organizational behavior
- Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding by David Hume
- Eric Schlosser's Fast Food Nation: The Destruction of American Values