Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: notes on branding
In this competitive world, nothing is as certain as uncertainty and nothing are as sustained as change for any businesses. Strategy building is not as simple as possible for companies and the ground rules for competition have shifted from predictable markets or stable product range to more dynamic and globalized ways. The traditional perceptions and applications of branding has been fully dominated by a product mindset. But changes in the modern era and huge technological developments laid difficulties in managing realistic product differentiation in the face of duplication and homogenization of products and services. Changes in the attitudes and mindsets of the customers are also making markets more complex and competitive in nature. Hence, companies shifted focus from branding of stand-alone products and services to a branding of the organization itself. Differentiation requires positioning the whole corporation in addition to its products. Accordingly, the corporate branding originates from distinct combinations of symbols, values and emotions that are salient to both the organization and its dynamic relationships with internal and external stakeholders (Hatch & Schultz 2003, 1041).
Many scholars and researchers quoted that corporate branding is an essential tool for any company and also argued that traditional branding approaches has been restricting and constrained by a narrow external perspective (e.g. Aaker 1996; Aaker & Joachimsthaler, 2000; Kapferer 2001; Hatch and Schultz, 2001; Olins, 2004). The shift towards corporate branding was best supported in marketing literature. Some among them claimed that strong corporate brands are increasingly helps in building consumer relations within the organization itself and stresse...
... middle of paper ...
...ng all stakeholders to multi-disciplinary approach and strategy building, the importance of employees and the need to better understand their perceptions towards once own corporation and therefore the organizational culture of the company received attention further by many scholars. Few among them argued that employees plays key role in building strong relationships with other stakeholders as well as contributing to the meaning of the companies brand (de Chernatony 2001; Harris and de Chernatony 2001; Hatch and Schultz 2001; Wilson 2001; Balmer and Soenen 1999). The study tries to through insights about the importance of employees in corporate branding from the above three objectives. Overall, the central aim of the paper is to study the shifts in corporate branding literature and highlights the importance of internal stakeholders in the corporate branding process.
More important than product, people, and advertising, branding is going forward as one of the most important factors in a business. While Klein has a bias against branding and wishes the reader a word of warning, in this specific essay she focuses on what branding means for the future. Klein starts off her minor claims with the bloating of corporations. “A consensus emerged that corporations were bloated, oversized; they owned too much, employed too many people, and were weighed down by too many things (Klein 769).” Through the use of branding, these same businesses could cut down all of their problems and payrolls through importing and simply putting their brand name on the product. Then when the dreaded “Marlboro Friday” happened, and it seemed that all brand significance was for naught, Klein showed us examples of businesses that thrived from a new age of marketing. “For these companies, the ostensible product was mere filler for the real production: the brand (Klein 774).” With brand driven marketing rather than product driven sales, businesses soared with selling the idea of their products more than their products quality. Using the example of Starbucks, Klein also supports her claims of branding not through marketing but weaving its name into products and culture. “The Starbucks coffee chain was also expanding during this period spinning its name into a wide range of branded projects: Starbucks airline coffee, office coffee, coffee ice cream, coffee beer (Klein 775).” By spreading its name not through marketing, but through spreading the brand through new and different products Starbucks found success in turning their brand concept into a virus and sending it through cultural sponsorship, political controversy, consumer experience and brand extensions. These forms of image building could make a company like Starbucks successful with branding over
Hence the corporation needs to evaluate and possibly adjust the corporate branding strategy on a regular basis. Obviously, a corporate brand should stay relevant, differentiated and consistent throughout time, so it is a crucial balance. The basic parts of the corporate branding strategy like vision, identity, personality and values are not to be changed often as they are the basic components. The changes are rather small and involve the thousands of daily actions and interpersonal behaviors, which the corporations employ as part of the brand marketing efforts. But make sure complacency does not take root in the organization and affects the goal setting. The strong brands are the ones which are driven forward by owners whom never get tired
In every given business, the name itself portrays different meanings. This serves as the reference point and sometimes the basis of customers on what to expect within the company. Since personality affects product image (Langmeyer & Shank, 1994), the presence of brand helps in the realization of this concept. Traditionally, brand is a symbolic manifestation of all the information connected with a company, product, or service (Nilson, 2003; Olin, 2003). A brand is typically composed of a name, logo, and other visual elements such as images, colors, and icons (Gillooley & Varley, 2001; Laforet & Saunders, 1994)). It is believed that a brand puts an impression to the consumer on what to expect to the product or service being offered (Mere, 1995). In other application, brand may be referred as trademark, which is legally appropriate term. The brand is the most powerful weapon in the market (LePla & Parker, 1999). Brands possess personality in which people associate their experience. Oftentimes, they are related to the core values the company executes.
Muzellec, Laurent, and Mary Lambkin. "Corporate rebranding: destroying, transferring or creating brand equity?." European Journal of Marketing 40.7/8 (2006): 803-824.
The term 'branding' in modern marketing is generally originated in the agricultural practices of the medieval age. The farmers 'branded' their animals with the iron and then they were able to identify to whom a particular animal belonged. Artisans 'branded' their products, for example, expensive silver tableware. Smiths 'branded' their swords. The role of the brand is to identify products by the same way as for medieval farmers and for modern corporations as well.
This paper argues why both brand identity and packaging are vital to a successful marketing strategy, and that they are more powerful intertwined, than as two separate elements.
There are many definitions of the term brand that are significantly different. Some definitions are based on the brand as a determinant of visual corporate identity of the company. Thus, the definition of the American Marketing Society perceives brand as “the name, term, design, symbol, or other feature that distinguishes one seller's product from those of others.” Visual identity is certainly important, but not the only aspect of the brand. It is a new dynamic experience of the product, which is created in the mind and emotions of consumers. In today's competitive environment, brand can be defined as “a set of expectations, memories, stories and relationships which, integrated, influence customers´
A comprehensive brand strategy can be broken down into few essential components that can help your company to sustain in the marketplace for years.
A brand identifies a seller’s product from a competitor’s product. There are three main purposes for branding product identification, which is the most important purpose, repeat sales, and new-product sales. Branding has a lot of terms that marketers use there is brand equity, global brand, and brand loyalty. Marketers also have different brand strategies that they use for different products or customers. It all depends on the consumer for them to decide which strategy they will use. The different strategies are generic products, manufacturer’s brands, private brands, individual brands, family brands, and co-branding. The branding purposes and the branding strategy make up the importance of branding.
As individuals make personal decisions to distinguish themselves from others, whether it’s by having a quirky personality, a unique way of dressing, or being highly intelligent, these components are what others will be reminded of when thinking of them. Therefore, like the individual, organizations also are intentional to differentiate themselves from their competition by creating a corporate identity with distinct traits that becomes the signature of the organization and brand. Corporate identity is defined as strategic choices made, that reflects the values and ethos of the organization that builds the corporate brand, and are inclusive of visual elements such as the organization’s name, logos, colors and designs
In today’s fast-paced world, branding is almost everything as it makes a brand or company valuable in front of competitors and customers. To keep pace with the modern business era, developing a strong brand identity for a small business is extremely a significant factor.
In its simplest form, corporate identity is a function of design that includes the name of the organization, its logos, the interior of the buildings, and visual identification such as uniforms of the staff, vehicles and signage. For a long period, graphic designers have remained highly influential been hugely influential in two regards, in that they articulated the basic tenets of corporate identity formation and management and succeeded in keeping the subject on the agenda of senior managers. Currently, symbolism, or design, has assumed a greater role and has moved on from merely increasing organizational visibility, to a more serious position of communicating corporate strategy (Ollins, 1978). There were now three main types of visual identity such as Monolithic (single brand visual), Endorsed (parent brand endorsing a sub-brand) and Branded (a plethora
Through this article the author endeavours to create an understanding for the term ‘Employer Branding’, understand the need & importance for Employer branding and enumerate fundamental methods to create a strong
Today's modern concept of branding grew out of the consumer packaged goods industry and the process of branding has come to include much more than just creating a way to identify a product or company. Branding is used to create emotional attachment to products and companies. Branding efforts create a feeling of involvement, a sense of higher quality, and an aura of intangible qualities that surround the brand name, mark, or symbol.
In its simplest form, corporate identity is a function of design that includes the name of the organization, its logos, the interior of the buildings, and visual identification such as uniforms of the staff, vehicles and signage. For a long period, graphic designers have remained highly influential been hugely influential in two regards, in that they articulated the basic tenets of corporate identity formation and management and succeeded in keeping the subject on the agenda of senior managers. Currently, symbolism, or design, has assumed a greater role and has moved on from merely increasing organizational visibility, to a more serious position of communicating corporate strategy (Ollins, 1978). There were now three main types of visual identity such as Monolithic (single brand visual), Endorsed (parent brand endorsing a sub-brand) and Branded (a plethora