Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corporate governance principles and rules
Corporate governance principles and rules
Corporate governance principles and rules
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corporate governance principles and rules
Corporate Accountability Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….3 2.0 The UK and the USA approaches………………………………………………3 3.0 Critical Evaluation of the use of the different Approaches…………………....4 3.1 The UK Rule-based Approach…………………………………………...4 3.2 The U.S.A Principle-based Approach……………………………………6 4.0 Evaluation of the reflection of specific systems…………………………………..7 5.0 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….....8 Corporate Accountability 1.0 Introduction Although the definition of corporate governance varies from one person to another, it is indicated that the 1992 United Kingdom Cadbury Report as well as the South African King Report of 1994 defined corporate governance as a system through which companies are controlled and directed. A much broader definition is however provided by the 1999 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which describes corporate governance as the existing relationships between a company’s board, shareholders and other stakeholders involved. Furthermore, the definition stipulates that, corporate governance avails a structure through which the company objectives are set and the how these objectives are to be attained and monitored is also determined by corporate governance. Corporate governance in the UK and the USA however has frameworks that are predictable under distinct approaches. 2.0 The UK and the USA approaches Corporate Governance frameworks in the UK are predicted using the rule-based approach while in USA it is the principle-based approach that is utilized. The U.K rule –based approach is basically controlled by the existing market and the lack of enforcement. In this approach to corporate governa... ... middle of paper ... ...porate governance. References 1. Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: a comparative approach . New York: Routeledge. 2. Collier, P. M. (2006). CIMA Learning System 2007 Management Accounting - Risk and Control Strategy . Biurlington: cima Publishing. 3. Corporate governance: a survey of OECD countries. (2004). Paris: OECD. 4. Davies, A. (1999). A strategic approach to corporate governance . England: Gower Publishing. 5. Effros, R. C. (1998). Current legal issues affecting central banks. Washington D.C: IMF. 6. Gopalsamy, N. (2006). A Guide To Corporate Governance . Delhi: New Age International. 7. Henk Overbeek. (2007). The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation . New York: Routeledge. 8. Pendlebury, M. (2004). Company accounts: analysis, interpretation and understanding . New York: Routeledge.
[1] Noreen, Eric W., Brewer Peter C., et al., Managerial Accounting for Managers, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY, 2011.
Management accounting in organisation is very important for decision-making and to make the business more efficient and therefore increasing its profits. Is the process of preparing accounts that can help managers to make day-to-day and short-term decisions, by providing them with accurate and timely key financial and statistical information...
Accountability….What does it mean? Well this past month e lost two soldiers who are a part of our unit and voice of our unit pass away. Accountability is important and should not be taken lightly… A soldier lost his life a couple weeks ago, due to lack of accountability, and it hurt a lot of people. For so many reasons accountability is important, for example. Knowing where your soldiers are at all times helps to know what they’re doing, and what their interest are doing so. In case something happens and someone needs t know where a soldier is accountability comes into play. Army Regulation 600-20 IAW Discipline. Why is discipline so important? Because to be accounted for is a part of disciplinary actions.
According to Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, & Langvardt (2010) “modern corporation law emerged only in the last 200 years, ancestors of the modern corporation existed in the times of Hammurabi, ancient Greece, and the Roman Empire. As early as 1248 in France, privileges of incorporation were given to mercantile ventures to encourage investment for the benefit of society. In England, the corporate form was used extensively before the 16th century. In the late 18th century, general incorporation statutes emerged in the United States” (p. 1009).
Australia, Singapore, and India all have corporate governance regulatory systems that are based on corporation legislation that presents for mandatory minimum standards dealing with matters such as directors' duties, members' remedies, and shareholder rights at meetings, and default rules for company foundations. These obligatory rules may be compulsory by civil actions brought by injured parties and criminal proceedings brought by the respective regulators. These minimum obligatory requirements cannot successfully deal with issues relating to matters such as board role, structure, and make up. These purposeful matters are dealt with by codes of globally documented corporate governance best practice sanctioned by a variety of stock exchanges and directed at listed companies. This comprises an appearance of self-regulation because it is not compulsory for companies to follow the best practice principles. The universal approach is to necessitate listed companies to reveal in their annual reports the corporate governance practices they have agreed to throughout the relevant year. The listing rules set out comprehensive endorsed practices, and companies are required to state the degree to which they have taken on these practices. Those companies that go away from the suggested practices are required to make clear why they have done so (Kimber & Lipton, 2005).
"Principles of Corporate Governance." 2012. The Harvard School of Law Forum. Ed. Noam Noked. Web. 2 April 2014. .
In recent years the issue of corporate governance has become a keenly debated topic in international finance. In developed countries, some of the biggest corporate collapses in history have brought about a change in focus. No longer are governments and lawmakers trying to deregulate and reduce the controls and disclosure requirements of corporations. The deregulation boom has ended, as regulation comes back into the picture.
Corporate accountability is an important subject in today’s society, in reading “Corporate Culpability Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” by Jennifer Moore it is obvious that she feels very strongly that corporations are not being held accountable for their actions. Jennifer argues that employees are often blamed for their actions, but are simply complying with their job. This is very insightful, and I find it very hard to disagree with her logic.
Gibson, C. H. (2011). Financial reporting & analysis: Using financial accounting information. (12th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. c. (2010). Managerial Accounting. New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
Proctor, R. (2012) Managerial Accounting: Decision Making and Performance Management. Fourth Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Corporate governance is the broad term that describes the process, laws, policies, customs, and institutions which provide guidance for the organizations and corporations in the way they manage, operate, and control their operations. It deals with the relationship among stakeholders and works to attain the goal of the organization. Similarly, it deals with the accountability of the individuals through a method which reduces the principal-agent problem in the organization. Fine corporate governance is a crucial standard for establishing the striking investment environment which is needed by competitive companies to gain strong ...
Heisinger, K., & Hoyle, J. B.(2012). Accounting for Managers. Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0. Retrieved from: https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/BookDetail.aspx?bookId=137
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Improving Business Behavior: Why we need Corporate Governance. Oct. 2004. OECD.
This paper examines the comparison of corporate governance codes between Malaysia and the United Kingdom (UK) which are the Malaysia Code of Corporate Governance with UK Corporate Governance Codes. The comparisons are based on the origins, compliance, board structure and key committees. UK Codes is based on voluntary and largely business driven while Malaysian Codes is regulatory driven.